Literature DB >> 21338353

Intentional genetic introgression influences survival of adults and subadults in a small, inbred felid population.

John F Benson1, Jeffrey A Hostetler, David P Onorato, Warren E Johnson, Melody E Roelke, Stephen J O'Brien, Deborah Jansen, Madan K Oli.   

Abstract

1. Inbreeding and low genetic diversity can cause reductions in individual fitness and increase extinction risk in animal populations. Intentional introgression, achieved by releasing genetically diverse individuals into inbred populations, has been used as a conservation tool to improve demographic performance in endangered populations. 2. By the 1980s, Florida panthers (Puma concolor coryi) had been reduced to a small, inbred population that appeared to be on the brink of extinction. In 1995, female pumas from Texas (P. c. stanleyana) were released in occupied panther range as part of an intentional introgression programme to restore genetic variability and improve demographic performance of panthers. 3. We used 25 years (1981-2006) of continuous radiotelemetry and genetic data to estimate and model subadult and adult panther survival and cause-specific mortality to provide rigorous sex and age class-specific survival estimates and evaluate the effect of the introgression programme on these parameters. 4. Genetic ancestry influenced annual survival of subadults and adults after introgression, as F(1) generation admixed panthers ( = 0·98) survived better than pre-introgression type panthers ( = 0·77) and other admixed individuals ( = 0·82). Furthermore, heterozygosity was higher for admixed panthers relative to pre-introgression type panthers and positively influenced survival. 5. Our results are consistent with hybrid vigour; however, extrinsic factors such as low density of males in some areas of panther range may also have contributed to higher survival of F(1) panthers. Regardless, improved survival of F(1) subadults and adults likely contributed to the numerical increase in panthers following introgression, and our results indicate that intentional admixture, achieved here by releasing individuals from another population, appears to have been successful in improving demographic performance in this highly endangered population.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2011 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21338353      PMCID: PMC6993175          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01809.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  28 in total

1.  Local drift load and the heterosis of interconnected populations.

Authors:  M C Whitlock; P K Ingvarsson; T Hatfield
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  A selective advantage to immigrant genes in a Daphnia metapopulation.

Authors:  Dieter Ebert; Christoph Haag; Mark Kirkpatrick; Myriam Riek; Jurgen W Hottinger; V Ilmari Pajunen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-01-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Genetic restoration of the Florida panther.

Authors:  Warren E Johnson; David P Onorato; Melody E Roelke; E Darrell Land; Mark Cunningham; Robert C Belden; Roy McBride; Deborah Jansen; Mark Lotz; David Shindle; JoGayle Howard; David E Wildt; Linda M Penfold; Jeffrey A Hostetler; Madan K Oli; Stephen J O'Brien
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Genomic ancestry of the American puma (Puma concolor).

Authors:  M Culver; W E Johnson; J Pecon-Slattery; S J O'Brien
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.645

Review 5.  Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management.

Authors:  Suzanne Edmands
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Alternative Hypotheses of Hybrid Vigor.

Authors:  J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1948-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Individual covariation in life-history traits: seeing the trees despite the forest.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Cam; William A Link; Evan G Cooch; Jean-Yves Monnat; Etienne Danchin
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Hybridization of bird species.

Authors:  P R Grant; B R Grant
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-04-10       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Tracking the long-term decline and recovery of an isolated population

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-11-27       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Epizootiology and management of feline leukemia virus in the Florida puma.

Authors:  Mark W Cunningham; Meredith A Brown; David B Shindle; Scott P Terrell; Kathleen A Hayes; Bambi C Ferree; R T McBride; Emmett L Blankenship; Deborah Jansen; Scott B Citino; Melody E Roelke; Richard A Kiltie; Jennifer L Troyer; Stephen J O'Brien
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.535

View more
  8 in total

1.  Does genetic introgression improve female reproductive performance? A test on the endangered Florida panther.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Hostetler; David P Onorato; Benjamin M Bolker; Warren E Johnson; Stephen J O'Brien; Deborah Jansen; Madan K Oli
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Interactions between demography, genetics, and landscape connectivity increase extinction probability for a small population of large carnivores in a major metropolitan area.

Authors:  John F Benson; Peter J Mahoney; Jeff A Sikich; Laurel E K Serieys; John P Pollinger; Holly B Ernest; Seth P D Riley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Altered lentiviral infection dynamics follow genetic rescue of the Florida panther.

Authors:  Jennifer L Malmberg; Justin S Lee; Roderick B Gagne; Simona Kraberger; Sarah Kechejian; Melody Roelke; Roy McBride; Dave Onorato; Mark Cunningham; Kevin R Crooks; Sue VandeWoude
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Genetic epidemiology of blood type, disease and trait variants, and genome-wide genetic diversity in over 11,000 domestic cats.

Authors:  Heidi Anderson; Stephen Davison; Katherine M Lytle; Leena Honkanen; Jamie Freyer; Julia Mathlin; Kaisa Kyöstilä; Laura Inman; Annette Louviere; Rebecca Chodroff Foran; Oliver P Forman; Hannes Lohi; Jonas Donner
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.020

5.  A single migrant enhances the genetic diversity of an inbred puma population.

Authors:  Kyle D Gustafson; T Winston Vickers; Walter M Boyce; Holly B Ernest
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Elucidating biogeographical patterns in Australian native canids using genome wide SNPs.

Authors:  Kylie M Cairns; Laura M Shannon; Janice Koler-Matznick; J William O Ballard; Adam R Boyko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  De Novo Assembly and Annotation from Parental and F1 Puma Genomes of the Florida Panther Genetic Restoration Program.

Authors:  Alexander Ochoa; David P Onorato; Robert R Fitak; Melody E Roelke-Parker; Melanie Culver
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 8.  Hybridization and extinction.

Authors:  Marco Todesco; Mariana A Pascual; Gregory L Owens; Katherine L Ostevik; Brook T Moyers; Sariel Hübner; Sylvia M Heredia; Min A Hahn; Celine Caseys; Dan G Bock; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 5.183

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.