Literature DB >> 12894939

The influence of variable rates of inbreeding on fitness, environmental responsiveness, and evolutionary potential.

Stacey B Day1, Edwin H Bryant, Lisa M Meffert.   

Abstract

We manipulated experimental populations of the housefly (Musca domestica L.) under three inbreeding schemes (fast, slow, and punctuated) to partition out the influences of different means and variances in the rate of inbreeding, per generation, while controlling for the final level of inbreeding as a constant. One treatment used constant fast inbreeding (11% per generation; Ne = 4 for 4 generations), for a comparison to one that was consistently slow (3% per generation; Ne = 16 for 14 generations). The third followed a model for serial founder-flush events. Each founder-flush episode involved a one-generation pulse of fast inbreeding (Ne = 4) followed by two generations of very low (or no) inbreeding, yielding high intergenerational variation (i.e., for an average inbreeding rate of 4% per generation). Allozyme assays showed that we achieved the intended final inbreeding coefficient of about 37%. All inbreeding schemes decreased fitness levels in terms of egg-to-adult viability, development time, and male mating success relative to the outbred control. The consistently fast inbreeding protocol had more pronounced reductions in fitness, relative to the other two inbreeding schemes. In comparison to the fast and punctuated regimes, the consistently slow protocol preserved evolutionary potential (as assayed by the genetic divergence of subpopulations exposed to different environments) in egg-to-adult viability, and (albeit anecdotally) reduced the extinction probabilities, especially in a novel environment. The punctuated treatment did not optimize the potential for purge as predicted, but instead reduced fitness, evolutionary potential, and environmental responsiveness (as measured by genotype-by-environment interactions). This founder-flush treatment also had the highest extinction probabilities. Longer periods of population flush might be necessary to purge effectively in a punctuated scheme. We conclude that the rate of inbreeding, independent from the final level, can have important effects on population fitness, environmental responsiveness, and evolutionary potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12894939     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00339.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  10 in total

1.  Genome-wide analysis on inbreeding effects on gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Torsten Nygaard Kristensen; Peter Sørensen; Mogens Kruhøffer; Kamilla Sofie Pedersen; Volker Loeschcke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Purging of Strongly Deleterious Mutations Explains Long-Term Persistence and Absence of Inbreeding Depression in Island Foxes.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Robinson; Caitlin Brown; Bernard Y Kim; Kirk E Lohmueller; Robert K Wayne
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Interactions between demography, genetics, and landscape connectivity increase extinction probability for a small population of large carnivores in a major metropolitan area.

Authors:  John F Benson; Peter J Mahoney; Jeff A Sikich; Laurel E K Serieys; John P Pollinger; Holly B Ernest; Seth P D Riley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Demographic costs of inbreeding revealed by sex-specific genetic rescue effects.

Authors:  Susanne R K Zajitschek; Felix Zajitschek; Robert C Brooks
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Genetic erosion impedes adaptive responses to stressful environments.

Authors:  R Bijlsma; Volker Loeschcke
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  The effect of inbreeding rate on fitness, inbreeding depression and heterosis over a range of inbreeding coefficients.

Authors:  Nina Pekkala; K Emily Knott; Janne S Kotiaho; Kari Nissinen; Mikael Puurtinen
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Genomic variation predicts adaptive evolutionary responses better than population bottleneck history.

Authors:  Michael Ørsted; Ary Anthony Hoffmann; Elsa Sverrisdóttir; Kåre Lehmann Nielsen; Torsten Nygaard Kristensen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Short and long-term costs of inbreeding in the lifelong-partnership in a termite.

Authors:  Pierre-André Eyer; Edward L Vargo
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-04-25

9.  Temporal and region-specific variations in genome-wide inbreeding effects on female size and reproduction traits of rainbow trout.

Authors:  Katy Paul; Jonathan D'Ambrosio; Florence Phocas
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.929

10.  Inbreeding rate modifies the dynamics of genetic load in small populations.

Authors:  Nina Pekkala; K Emily Knott; Janne S Kotiaho; Mikael Puurtinen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.