Literature DB >> 21113436

Genetic Introgression and the Survival of Florida Panther Kittens.

Jeffrey A Hostetler1, David P Onorato, James D Nichols, Warren E Johnson, Melody E Roelke, Stephen J O'Brien, Deborah Jansen, Madan K Oli.   

Abstract

Estimates of survival for the young of a species are critical for population models. These models can often be improved by determining the effects of management actions and population abundance on this demographic parameter. We used multiple sources of data collected during 1982-2008 and a live recapture-dead recovery modeling framework to estimate and model survival of Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi) kittens (age 0 - 1 year). Overall, annual survival of Florida panther kittens was 0.323 ± 0.071 (SE), which was lower than estimates used in previous population models. In 1995, female pumas from Texas (P. c. stanleyana) were released into occupied panther range as part of an intentional introgression program to restore genetic variability. We found that kitten survival generally increased with degree of admixture: F(1) admixed and backcrossed to Texas kittens survived better than canonical Florida panther and backcrossed to canonical kittens. Average heterozygosity positively influenced kitten and older panther survival, whereas index of panther abundance negatively influenced kitten survival. Our results provide strong evidence for the positive population-level impact of genetic introgression on Florida panthers. Our approach to integrate data from multiple sources was effective at improving robustness as well as precision of estimates of Florida panther kitten survival, and can be useful in estimating vital rates for other elusive species with sparse data.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21113436      PMCID: PMC2989677          DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.07.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Conserv        ISSN: 0006-3207            Impact factor:   5.990


  15 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genomic microsatellites as evolutionary chronometers: a test in wild cats.

Authors:  Carlos A Driscoll; Marilyn Menotti-Raymond; George Nelson; David Goldstein; Stephen J O'Brien
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  The relative importance of life-history variables to population growth rate in mammals: Cole's prediction revisited.

Authors:  Madan K Oli; F Stephen Dobson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  The consequences of demographic reduction and genetic depletion in the endangered Florida panther.

Authors:  M E Roelke; J S Martenson; S J O'Brien
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1993-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Alternative Hypotheses of Hybrid Vigor.

Authors:  J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1948-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Sink populations in carnivore management: cougar demography and immigration in a hunted population.

Authors:  Hugh S Robinson; Robert B Wielgus; Hilary S Cooley; Skye W Cooley
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  Genetic individualization of domestic cats using feline STR loci for forensic applications.

Authors:  M Menotti-Raymond; V A David; J C Stephens; L A Lyons; S J O'Brien
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.832

8.  Spatiotemporal variation in survival rates: implications for population dynamics of yellow-bellied marmots.

Authors:  Arpat Ozgul; Kenneth B Armitage; Daniel T Blumstein; Madan K Oli
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Sport hunting, predator control and conservation of large carnivores.

Authors:  Craig Packer; Margaret Kosmala; Hilary S Cooley; Henry Brink; Lilian Pintea; David Garshelis; Gianetta Purchase; Megan Strauss; Alexandra Swanson; Guy Balme; Luke Hunter; Kristin Nowell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Why not the best? How science failed the Florida panther.

Authors:  Liza Gross
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-08-23       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  8 in total

1.  Does genetic introgression improve female reproductive performance? A test on the endangered Florida panther.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Hostetler; David P Onorato; Benjamin M Bolker; Warren E Johnson; Stephen J O'Brien; Deborah Jansen; Madan K Oli
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Interactions between demography, genetics, and landscape connectivity increase extinction probability for a small population of large carnivores in a major metropolitan area.

Authors:  John F Benson; Peter J Mahoney; Jeff A Sikich; Laurel E K Serieys; John P Pollinger; Holly B Ernest; Seth P D Riley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Altered lentiviral infection dynamics follow genetic rescue of the Florida panther.

Authors:  Jennifer L Malmberg; Justin S Lee; Roderick B Gagne; Simona Kraberger; Sarah Kechejian; Melody Roelke; Roy McBride; Dave Onorato; Mark Cunningham; Kevin R Crooks; Sue VandeWoude
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Intentional genetic introgression influences survival of adults and subadults in a small, inbred felid population.

Authors:  John F Benson; Jeffrey A Hostetler; David P Onorato; Warren E Johnson; Melody E Roelke; Stephen J O'Brien; Deborah Jansen; Madan K Oli
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  A single migrant enhances the genetic diversity of an inbred puma population.

Authors:  Kyle D Gustafson; T Winston Vickers; Walter M Boyce; Holly B Ernest
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  De Novo Assembly and Annotation from Parental and F1 Puma Genomes of the Florida Panther Genetic Restoration Program.

Authors:  Alexander Ochoa; David P Onorato; Robert R Fitak; Melody E Roelke-Parker; Melanie Culver
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Consideration of genetic variation and evolutionary history in future conservation of Indian one-horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis).

Authors:  Tista Ghosh; Shrewshree Kumar; Kirtika Sharma; Parikshit Kakati; Amit Sharma; Samrat Mondol
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-20

8.  Mixing Genetically and Morphologically Distinct Populations in Translocations: Asymmetrical Introgression in A Newly Established Population of the Boodie (Bettongia lesueur).

Authors:  Rujiporn Thavornkanlapachai; Harriet R Mills; Kym Ottewell; Judy Dunlop; Colleen Sims; Keith Morris; Felicity Donaldson; W Jason Kennington
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.096

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.