Leah Muller1, Liberty S Hamilton, Erik Edwards, Kristofer E Bouchard, Edward F Chang. 1. Department of Neurological Surgery and Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Room 511, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. Joint Program in Bioengineering, UC Berkeley/UC San Francisco, USA. Medical Scientist Training Program, UC San Francisco, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Electrocorticography (ECoG) has become an important tool in human neuroscience and has tremendous potential for emerging applications in neural interface technology. Electrode array design parameters are outstanding issues for both research and clinical applications, and these parameters depend critically on the nature of the neural signals to be recorded. Here, we investigate the functional spatial resolution of neural signals recorded at the human cortical surface. We empirically derive spatial spread functions to quantify the shared neural activity for each frequency band of the electrocorticogram. APPROACH: Five subjects with high-density (4 mm center-to-center spacing) ECoG grid implants participated in speech perception and production tasks while neural activity was recorded from the speech cortex, including superior temporal gyrus, precentral gyrus, and postcentral gyrus. The cortical surface field potential was decomposed into traditional EEG frequency bands. Signal similarity between electrode pairs for each frequency band was quantified using a Pearson correlation coefficient. MAIN RESULTS: The correlation of neural activity between electrode pairs was inversely related to the distance between the electrodes; this relationship was used to quantify spatial falloff functions for cortical subdomains. As expected, lower frequencies remained correlated over larger distances than higher frequencies. However, both the envelope and phase of gamma and high gamma frequencies (30-150 Hz) are largely uncorrelated (<90%) at 4 mm, the smallest spacing of the high-density arrays. Thus, ECoG arrays smaller than 4 mm have significant promise for increasing signal resolution at high frequencies, whereas less additional gain is achieved for lower frequencies. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings quantitatively demonstrate the dependence of ECoG spatial resolution on the neural frequency of interest. We demonstrate that this relationship is consistent across patients and across cortical areas during activity.
OBJECTIVE: Electrocorticography (ECoG) has become an important tool in human neuroscience and has tremendous potential for emerging applications in neural interface technology. Electrode array design parameters are outstanding issues for both research and clinical applications, and these parameters depend critically on the nature of the neural signals to be recorded. Here, we investigate the functional spatial resolution of neural signals recorded at the human cortical surface. We empirically derive spatial spread functions to quantify the shared neural activity for each frequency band of the electrocorticogram. APPROACH: Five subjects with high-density (4 mm center-to-center spacing) ECoG grid implants participated in speech perception and production tasks while neural activity was recorded from the speech cortex, including superior temporal gyrus, precentral gyrus, and postcentral gyrus. The cortical surface field potential was decomposed into traditional EEG frequency bands. Signal similarity between electrode pairs for each frequency band was quantified using a Pearson correlation coefficient. MAIN RESULTS: The correlation of neural activity between electrode pairs was inversely related to the distance between the electrodes; this relationship was used to quantify spatial falloff functions for cortical subdomains. As expected, lower frequencies remained correlated over larger distances than higher frequencies. However, both the envelope and phase of gamma and high gamma frequencies (30-150 Hz) are largely uncorrelated (<90%) at 4 mm, the smallest spacing of the high-density arrays. Thus, ECoG arrays smaller than 4 mm have significant promise for increasing signal resolution at high frequencies, whereas less additional gain is achieved for lower frequencies. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings quantitatively demonstrate the dependence of ECoG spatial resolution on the neural frequency of interest. We demonstrate that this relationship is consistent across patients and across cortical areas during activity.
Authors: Brian Wodlinger; Alan D Degenhart; Jennifer L Collinger; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Wei Wang Journal: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2011
Authors: Erik Edwards; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Sarang S Dalal; Ryan T Canolty; Heidi E Kirsch; Nicholas M Barbaro; Robert T Knight Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-12-21 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Makoto Fukushima; Richard C Saunders; David A Leopold; Mortimer Mishkin; Bruno B Averbeck Journal: Neuron Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Jonathan Viventi; Dae-Hyeong Kim; Leif Vigeland; Eric S Frechette; Justin A Blanco; Yun-Soung Kim; Andrew E Avrin; Vineet R Tiruvadi; Suk-Won Hwang; Ann C Vanleer; Drausin F Wulsin; Kathryn Davis; Casey E Gelber; Larry Palmer; Jan Van der Spiegel; Jian Wu; Jianliang Xiao; Yonggang Huang; Diego Contreras; John A Rogers; Brian Litt Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2011-11-13 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Thaddeus R Cybulski; Joshua I Glaser; Adam H Marblestone; Bradley M Zamft; Edward S Boyden; George M Church; Konrad P Kording Journal: Front Comput Neurosci Date: 2015-01-21 Impact factor: 2.380
Authors: Chia-Han Chiang; Sang Min Won; Amy L Orsborn; Ki Jun Yu; Michael Trumpis; Brinnae Bent; Charles Wang; Yeguang Xue; Seunghwan Min; Virginia Woods; Chunxiu Yu; Bong Hoon Kim; Sung Bong Kim; Rizwan Huq; Jinghua Li; Kyung Jin Seo; Flavia Vitale; Andrew Richardson; Hui Fang; Yonggang Huang; Kenneth Shepard; Bijan Pesaran; John A Rogers; Jonathan Viventi Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2020-04-08 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Virginia Woods; Michael Trumpis; Brinnae Bent; Kay Palopoli-Trojani; Chia-Han Chiang; Charles Wang; Chunxiu Yu; Michele N Insanally; Robert C Froemke; Jonathan Viventi Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2018-09-24 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Chia-Han Chiang; Charles Wang; Katrina Barth; Shervin Rahimpour; Michael Trumpis; Suseendrakumar Duraivel; Iakov Rachinskiy; Agrita Dubey; Katie E Wingel; Megan Wong; Nicholas S Witham; Thomas Odell; Virginia Woods; Brinnae Bent; Werner Doyle; Daniel Friedman; Eckardt Bihler; Christopher F Reiche; Derek G Southwell; Michael M Haglund; Allan H Friedman; Shivanand P Lad; Sasha Devore; Orrin Devinsky; Florian Solzbacher; Bijan Pesaran; Gregory Cogan; Jonathan Viventi Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Vyassa L Baratham; Maximilian E Dougherty; John Hermiz; Peter Ledochowitsch; Michel M Maharbiz; Kristofer E Bouchard Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 6.709