Literature DB >> 22254991

The impact of electrode characteristics on electrocorticography (ECoG).

Brian Wodlinger1, Alan D Degenhart, Jennifer L Collinger, Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara, Wei Wang.   

Abstract

Used clinically since Penfield and Jasper's pioneering work in the 1950's, electrocorticography (ECoG) has recently been investigated as a promising technology for brain-computer interfacing. Many researchers have attempted to analyze the properties of ECoG recordings, including prediction of optimal electrode spacing and the improved resolution expected with smaller electrodes. This work applies an analytic model of the volume conductor to investigate the sensitivity field of electrodes of various sizes. The benefit to spatial resolution was minimal for electrodes smaller than ~1mm, while smaller electrodes caused a dramatic decrease in signal-to-noise ratio. The temporal correlation between electrode pairs is predicted over a range of spacings and compared to correlation values from a series of recordings in subjects undergoing monitoring for intractable epilepsy. The observed correlations are found to be much higher than predicted by the analytic model and suggest a more detailed model of cortical activity is needed to identify appropriate ECoG grid spacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22254991     DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  10 in total

Review 1.  The Potential for a Speech Brain-Computer Interface Using Chronic Electrocorticography.

Authors:  Qinwan Rabbani; Griffin Milsap; Nathan E Crone
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Towards large-scale, human-based, mesoscopic neurotechnologies.

Authors:  Edward F Chang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Spatial resolution dependence on spectral frequency in human speech cortex electrocorticography.

Authors:  Leah Muller; Liberty S Hamilton; Erik Edwards; Kristofer E Bouchard; Edward F Chang
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 4.  The use of intracranial recordings to decode human language: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Stephanie Martin; José Del R Millán; Robert T Knight; Brian N Pasley
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Motor-related brain activity during action observation: a neural substrate for electrocorticographic brain-computer interfaces after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jennifer L Collinger; Ramana Vinjamuri; Alan D Degenhart; Douglas J Weber; Gustavo P Sudre; Michael L Boninger; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Wei Wang
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-19

6.  Word pair classification during imagined speech using direct brain recordings.

Authors:  Stephanie Martin; Peter Brunner; Iñaki Iturrate; José Del R Millán; Gerwin Schalk; Robert T Knight; Brian N Pasley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Rapid tuning shifts in human auditory cortex enhance speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Christopher R Holdgraf; Wendy de Heer; Brian Pasley; Jochem Rieger; Nathan Crone; Jack J Lin; Robert T Knight; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  High Spatiotemporal Resolution ECoG Recording of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials with Flexible Micro-Electrode Arrays.

Authors:  Taro Kaiju; Keiichi Doi; Masashi Yokota; Kei Watanabe; Masato Inoue; Hiroshi Ando; Kazutaka Takahashi; Fumiaki Yoshida; Masayuki Hirata; Takafumi Suzuki
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.492

Review 9.  Decoding Inner Speech Using Electrocorticography: Progress and Challenges Toward a Speech Prosthesis.

Authors:  Stephanie Martin; Iñaki Iturrate; José Del R Millán; Robert T Knight; Brian N Pasley
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Signal quality of simultaneously recorded endovascular, subdural and epidural signals are comparable.

Authors:  Sam E John; Nicholas L Opie; Yan T Wong; Gil S Rind; Stephen M Ronayne; Giulia Gerboni; Sebastien H Bauquier; Terence J O'Brien; Clive N May; David B Grayden; Thomas J Oxley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.