Stephen Meisenhelter1, Barbara C Jobst2,3. 1. Department of Neurology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA. stephen.meisenhelter.gr@dartmouth.edu. 2. Department of Neurology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Memory is one of the top concerns of epilepsy patients, but there are no known treatments to directly alleviate the memory deficits associated with epilepsy. Neurostimulation may provide new therapeutic tools to enhance memory in epilepsy patients. Here, we critically review recent investigations of memory enhancement using transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), chronic intracranial stimulation, and acute intracranial stimulation. RECENT FINDINGS: Existing literature suggests that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) produces a small enhancement in memory in neuropsychological patients, but transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) have not been found to have an effect on memory. Most studies of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have found that TMS has no positive effect on memory. Vagus nerve stimulation can acutely enhance memory, while chronic therapy does not appear to alter memory performance. We found that there is the most evidence for significant memory enhancement using intracranial stimulation techniques, especially chronic stimulation of the fornix and task-responsive stimulation of the lateral temporal lobe. Presently, there are no existing therapeutic options for directly treating epilepy-related memory deficits. While neurostimulation technologies for memory enhancement are largely still in the experimental phase, neurostimulation appears promising as a future technique for treating epilepsy-related memory deficits.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Memory is one of the top concerns of epilepsypatients, but there are no known treatments to directly alleviate the memory deficits associated with epilepsy. Neurostimulation may provide new therapeutic tools to enhance memory in epilepsypatients. Here, we critically review recent investigations of memory enhancement using transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), chronic intracranial stimulation, and acute intracranial stimulation. RECENT FINDINGS: Existing literature suggests that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) produces a small enhancement in memory in neuropsychological patients, but transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) have not been found to have an effect on memory. Most studies of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have found that TMS has no positive effect on memory. Vagus nerve stimulation can acutely enhance memory, while chronic therapy does not appear to alter memory performance. We found that there is the most evidence for significant memory enhancement using intracranial stimulation techniques, especially chronic stimulation of the fornix and task-responsive stimulation of the lateral temporal lobe. Presently, there are no existing therapeutic options for directly treating epilepy-related memory deficits. While neurostimulation technologies for memory enhancement are largely still in the experimental phase, neurostimulation appears promising as a future technique for treating epilepsy-related memory deficits.
Authors: Cory S Inman; Joseph R Manns; Kelly R Bijanki; David I Bass; Stephan Hamann; Daniel L Drane; Rebecca E Fasano; Christopher K Kovach; Robert E Gross; Jon T Willie Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-12-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Robert E Hampson; Dong Song; Ioan Opris; Lucas M Santos; Dae C Shin; Greg A Gerhardt; Vasilis Z Marmarelis; Theodore W Berger; Sam A Deadwyler Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Charlotte J Stagg; Jonathan G Best; Mary C Stephenson; Jacinta O'Shea; Marzena Wylezinska; Z Tamas Kincses; Peter G Morris; Paul M Matthews; Heidi Johansen-Berg Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Michal T Kucewicz; Brent M Berry; Vaclav Kremen; Laura R Miller; Fatemeh Khadjevand; Youssef Ezzyat; Joel M Stein; Paul Wanda; Michael R Sperling; Richard Gorniak; Kathryn A Davis; Barbara C Jobst; Robert E Gross; Bradley Lega; S Matt Stead; Daniel S Rizzuto; Michael J Kahana; Gregory A Worrell Journal: eNeuro Date: 2018-02-02
Authors: Klára Štillová; Pavel Jurák; Jan Chládek; Jan Chrastina; Josef Halámek; Martina Bočková; Sabina Goldemundová; Ivo Říha; Ivan Rektor Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Linda Douw; Ida A Nissen; Sophie M D D Fitzsimmons; Fernando A N Santos; Arjan Hillebrand; Elisabeth C W van Straaten; Cornelis J Stam; Philip C De Witt Hamer; Johannes C Baayen; Martin Klein; Jaap C Reijneveld; Djai B Heyer; Matthijs B Verhoog; René Wilbers; Sarah Hunt; Huibert D Mansvelder; Jeroen J G Geurts; Christiaan P J de Kock; Natalia A Goriounova Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2022-05-30 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Robert J Quon; Grace A Leslie; Edward J Camp; Stephen Meisenhelter; Sarah A Steimel; Yinchen Song; Alan B Ettinger; Krzysztof A Bujarski; Michael A Casey; Barbara C Jobst Journal: Acta Neurol Scand Date: 2021-04-24 Impact factor: 3.915
Authors: Diana Pizarro; Emilia Toth; Auriana Irannejad; Kristen O Riley; Zeenat Jaisani; Wolfgang Muhlhofer; Roy Martin; Sandipan Pati Journal: Epilepsy Behav Case Rep Date: 2018-08-03