Literature DB >> 24921984

Analysis of deep brain stimulation electrode characteristics for neural recording.

Alexander R Kent1, Warren M Grill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Closed-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems have the potential to optimize treatment of movement disorders by enabling automatic adjustment of stimulation parameters based on a feedback signal. Evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) and local field potentials (LFPs) recorded from the DBS electrode may serve as suitable closed-loop control signals. The objective of this study was to understand better the factors that influence ECAP and LFP recording, including the physical presence of the electrode, the geometrical dimensions of the electrode, and changes in the composition of the peri-electrode space across recording conditions. APPROACH: Coupled volume conductor-neuron models were used to calculate single-unit activity as well as ECAP responses and LFP activity from a population of model thalamic neurons. MAIN
RESULTS: Comparing ECAPs and LFPs measured with and without the presence of the highly conductive recording contacts, we found that the presence of these contacts had a negligible effect on the magnitude of single-unit recordings, ECAPs (7% RMS difference between waveforms), and LFPs (5% change in signal magnitude). Spatial averaging across the contact surface decreased the ECAP magnitude in a phase-dependent manner (74% RMS difference), resulting from a differential effect of the contact on the contribution from nearby or distant elements, and decreased the LFP magnitude (25% change). Reductions in the electrode diameter or recording contact length increased signal energy and increased spatial sensitivity of single neuron recordings. Moreover, smaller diameter electrodes (500 µm) were more selective for recording from local cells over passing axons, with the opposite true for larger diameters (1500 µm). Changes in electrode dimensions had phase-dependent effects on ECAP characteristics, and generally had small effects on the LFP magnitude. ECAP signal energy and LFP magnitude decreased with tighter contact spacing (100 µm), compared to the original dimensions (1500 µm), with the opposite effect on the ECAP at longer contact-to-contact distances (2000 µm). Finally, acute edema reduced the single neuron and population ECAP signal energy, as well as LFP magnitude, and glial encapsulation had the opposite effect, after accounting for loss of cells in the peri-electrode space. SIGNIFICANCE: This study determined recording conditions and electrode designs that influence ECAP and LFP recording fidelity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24921984      PMCID: PMC4108584          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/4/046010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  47 in total

1.  Effect of electrode dimensions on motor unit potentials.

Authors:  N A Dimitrova; G V Dimitrov; V N Chikhman
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 2.  Introduction to the programming of deep brain stimulators.

Authors:  Jens Volkmann; Jan Herzog; Florian Kopper; Güntner Deuschl
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 10.338

3.  Model of low-pass filtering of local field potentials in brain tissue.

Authors:  C Bédard; H Kröger; A Destexhe
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2006-05-19

4.  Thalamic and subthalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: where is the optimal target?

Authors:  Ulrika Sandvik; Lars-Owe Koskinen; Anders Lundquist; Patric Blomstedt
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Modeling the excitability of mammalian nerve fibers: influence of afterpotentials on the recovery cycle.

Authors:  Cameron C McIntyre; Andrew G Richardson; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) controlled by local field potential oscillations.

Authors:  Alberto Priori; Guglielmo Foffani; Lorenzo Rossi; Sara Marceglia
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  On the optimal choice of a recording electrode in electroneurography.

Authors:  R Schoonhoven; J P De Weerd
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-10

8.  Recording evoked potentials during deep brain stimulation: development and validation of instrumentation to suppress the stimulus artefact.

Authors:  A R Kent; W M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Effects of stimulation of the subthalamic area on oscillatory pallidal activity in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Peter Brown; Paolo Mazzone; Antonio Oliviero; Maria Grazia Altibrandi; Fabio Pilato; Pietro A Tonali; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.330

10.  Current-controlled deep brain stimulation reduces in vivo voltage fluctuations observed during voltage-controlled stimulation.

Authors:  Scott F Lempka; Matthew D Johnson; Svjetlana Miocinovic; Jerrold L Vitek; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  11 in total

1.  Measurement of evoked potentials during thalamic deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander R Kent; Brandon D Swan; David T Brocker; Dennis A Turner; Robert E Gross; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Field potential 1/f activity in the subcallosal cingulate region as a candidate signal for monitoring deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Ashan Veerakumar; Vineet Tiruvadi; Bryan Howell; Allison C Waters; Andrea L Crowell; Bradley Voytek; Patricio Riva-Posse; Lydia Denison; Justin K Rajendra; Johnathan A Edwards; Kelly R Bijanki; Ki Sueng Choi; Helen S Mayberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Evoked potentials reveal neural circuits engaged by human deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Stephen L Schmidt; David T Brocker; Brandon D Swan; Dennis A Turner; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Spatial resolution dependence on spectral frequency in human speech cortex electrocorticography.

Authors:  Leah Muller; Liberty S Hamilton; Erik Edwards; Kristofer E Bouchard; Edward F Chang
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Evoked Potentials Recorded From the Spinal Cord During Neurostimulation for Pain: A Computational Modeling Study.

Authors:  Carlos J Anaya; Hans J Zander; Robert D Graham; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Scott F Lempka
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2019-06-19

6.  Numerical characterization of intraoperative and chronic electrodes in deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Alessandra Paffi; Francesca Camera; Francesca Apollonio; Guglielmo d'Inzeo; Micaela Liberti
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  A critical reflection on the technological development of deep brain stimulation (DBS).

Authors:  Christian Ineichen; Walter Glannon; Yasin Temel; Christian R Baumann; Oguzkan Sürücü
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Contributions of Subsurface Cortical Modulations to Discrimination of Executed and Imagined Grasp Forces through Stereoelectroencephalography.

Authors:  Brian A Murphy; Jonathan P Miller; Kabilar Gunalan; A Bolu Ajiboye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Electrophoretic deposition of ligand-free platinum nanoparticles on neural electrodes affects their impedance in vitro and in vivo with no negative effect on reactive gliosis.

Authors:  Svilen D Angelov; Sven Koenen; Jurij Jakobi; Hans E Heissler; Mesbah Alam; Kerstin Schwabe; Stephan Barcikowski; Joachim K Krauss
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 10.435

10.  An open-label, one-arm, dose-escalation study to evaluate safety and tolerability of extremely low frequency magnetic fields in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Fioravante Capone; Micaela Liberti; Francesca Apollonio; Francesca Camera; Stefania Setti; Ruggero Cadossi; Carlo Cosimo Quattrocchi; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.