Literature DB >> 29517819

MR-assisted PET motion correction in simultaneous PET/MRI studies of dementia subjects.

Kevin T Chen1,2, Stephanie Salcedo1, Daniel B Chonde1,3, David Izquierdo-Garcia1, Michael A Levine1,3, Julie C Price1, Bradford C Dickerson1,4, Ciprian Catana1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subject motion in positron emission tomography (PET) studies leads to image blurring and artifacts; simultaneously acquired magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data provides a means for motion correction (MC) in integrated PET/MRI scanners.
PURPOSE: To assess the effect of realistic head motion and MR-based MC on static [18 F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET images in dementia patients. STUDY TYPE: Observational study. POPULATION: Thirty dementia subjects were recruited. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T hybrid PET/MR scanner where EPI-based and T1 -weighted sequences were acquired simultaneously with the PET data. ASSESSMENT: Head motion parameters estimated from high temporal resolution MR volumes were used for PET MC. The MR-based MC method was compared to PET frame-based MC methods in which motion parameters were estimated by coregistering 5-minute frames before and after accounting for the attenuation-emission mismatch. The relative changes in standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) between the PET volumes processed with the various MC methods, without MC, and the PET volumes with simulated motion were compared in relevant brain regions. STATISTICAL TESTS: The absolute value of the regional SUVR relative change was assessed with pairwise paired t-tests testing at the P = 0.05 level, comparing the values obtained through different MR-based MC processing methods as well as across different motion groups. The intraregion voxelwise variability of regional SUVRs obtained through different MR-based MC processing methods was also assessed with pairwise paired t-tests testing at the P = 0.05 level.
RESULTS: MC had a greater impact on PET data quantification in subjects with larger amplitude motion (higher than 18% in the medial orbitofrontal cortex) and greater changes were generally observed for the MR-based MC method compared to the frame-based methods. Furthermore, a mean relative change of ∼4% was observed after MC even at the group level, suggesting the importance of routinely applying this correction. The intraregion voxelwise variability of regional SUVRs was also decreased using MR-based MC. All comparisons were significant at the P = 0.05 level. DATA
CONCLUSION: Incorporating temporally correlated MR data to account for intraframe motion has a positive impact on the FDG PET image quality and data quantification in dementia patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1288-1296.
© 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET/MRI; dementia; motion correction; simultaneous imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29517819      PMCID: PMC6129224          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  27 in total

Review 1.  Multimodal imaging in Alzheimer's disease: validity and usefulness for early detection.

Authors:  Stefan Teipel; Alexander Drzezga; Michel J Grothe; Henryk Barthel; Gaël Chételat; Norbert Schuff; Pawel Skudlarski; Enrica Cavedo; Giovanni B Frisoni; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Jochen René Thyrian; Chris Fox; Satoshi Minoshima; Osama Sabri; Andreas Fellgiebel
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 44.182

2.  Motion artifact reduction on parametric PET images of neuroreceptor binding.

Authors:  Hans Herzog; Lutz Tellmann; Roger Fulton; Isabelle Stangier; Elena Rota Kops; Kay Bente; Christian Boy; Rene Hurlemann; Uwe Pietrzyk
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Head motion evaluation and correction for PET scans with 18F-FDG in the Japanese Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (J-ADNI) multi-center study.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Ikari; Tomoyuki Nishio; Yoko Makishi; Yukari Miya; Kengo Ito; Robert A Koeppe; Michio Senda
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.668

4.  Anatomically-aided PET reconstruction using the kernel method.

Authors:  Will Hutchcroft; Guobao Wang; Kevin T Chen; Ciprian Catana; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Combining MR imaging, positron-emission tomography, and CSF biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  K B Walhovd; A M Fjell; J Brewer; L K McEvoy; C Fennema-Notestine; D J Hagler; R G Jennings; D Karow; A M Dale
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Golden-angle radial sparse parallel MRI: combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling for fast and flexible dynamic volumetric MRI.

Authors:  Li Feng; Robert Grimm; Kai Tobias Block; Hersh Chandarana; Sungheon Kim; Jian Xu; Leon Axel; Daniel K Sodickson; Ricardo Otazo
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Correction of head movement on PET studies: comparison of methods.

Authors:  Andrew J Montgomery; Kris Thielemans; Mitul A Mehta; Federico Turkheimer; Sanida Mustafovic; Paul M Grasby
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Volumetric navigators for prospective motion correction and selective reacquisition in neuroanatomical MRI.

Authors:  M Dylan Tisdall; Aaron T Hess; Martin Reuter; Ernesta M Meintjes; Bruce Fischl; André J W van der Kouwe
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 9.  From mild cognitive impairment to subjective cognitive decline: conceptual and methodological evolution.

Authors:  Yu-Wen Cheng; Ta-Fu Chen; Ming-Jang Chiu
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.570

10.  MR-based PET motion correction procedure for simultaneous MR-PET neuroimaging of human brain.

Authors:  Marcus Görge Ullisch; Jürgen Johann Scheins; Christoph Weirich; Elena Rota Kops; Abdullah Celik; Lutz Tellmann; Tony Stöcker; Hans Herzog; Nadim Jon Shah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  12 in total

1.  Summary of the First ISMRM-SNMMI Workshop on PET/MRI: Applications and Limitations.

Authors:  Thomas A Hope; Zahi A Fayad; Kathryn J Fowler; Dawn Holley; Andrei Iagaru; Alan B McMillan; Patrick Veit-Haiback; Robert J Witte; Greg Zaharchuk; Ciprian Catana
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Comparison of the clinical performance of upper abdominal PET/DCE-MRI with and without concurrent respiratory motion correction (MoCo).

Authors:  Onofrio A Catalano; Lale Umutlu; Niccolo Fuin; Matthew Louis Hibert; Michele Scipioni; Stefano Pedemonte; Mark Vangel; Andreea Maria Catana; Ken Herrmann; Felix Nensa; David Groshar; Umar Mahmood; Bruce R Rosen; Ciprian Catana
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Advances in simultaneous PET/MR for imaging neuroreceptor function.

Authors:  Christin Y Sander; Hanne D Hansen; Hsiao-Ying Wey
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Specific absorption rate implications of within-scan patient head motion for ultra-high field MRI.

Authors:  Emre Kopanoglu; Cem M Deniz; M Arcan Erturk; Richard G Wise
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  MR-PET head motion correction based on co-registration of multicontrast MR images.

Authors:  Zhaolin Chen; Francesco Sforazzini; Jakub Baran; Thomas Close; Nadim Jon Shah; Gary F Egan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Synergistic motion compensation strategies for positron emission tomography when acquired simultaneously with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Irene Polycarpou; Georgios Soultanidis; Charalampos Tsoumpas
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Ultra-Low-Dose 18F-Florbetaben Amyloid PET Imaging Using Deep Learning with Multi-Contrast MRI Inputs.

Authors:  Kevin T Chen; Enhao Gong; Fabiola Bezerra de Carvalho Macruz; Junshen Xu; Athanasia Boumis; Mehdi Khalighi; Kathleen L Poston; Sharon J Sha; Michael D Greicius; Elizabeth Mormino; John M Pauly; Shyam Srinivas; Greg Zaharchuk
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 29.146

8.  Assessment of motion and model bias on the detection of dopamine response to behavioral challenge.

Authors:  Michael A Levine; Joseph B Mandeville; Finnegan Calabro; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Daniel B Chonde; Kevin T Chen; Inki Hong; Julie C Price; Beatriz Luna; Ciprian Catana
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 6.960

Review 9.  MRI-Driven PET Image Optimization for Neurological Applications.

Authors:  Yuankai Zhu; Xiaohua Zhu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 10.  Methods for Quantifying Neurotransmitter Dynamics in the Living Brain With PET Imaging.

Authors:  Jenny Ceccarini; Heather Liu; Koen Van Laere; Evan D Morris; Christin Y Sander
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.