| Literature DB >> 27573541 |
Ahmed Almazroa1,2, Sami Alodhayb3, Essameldin Osman4, Eslam Ramadan5, Mohammed Hummadi6, Mohammed Dlaim7, Muhannad Alkatee8, Kaamran Raahemifar9, Vasudevan Lakshminarayanan2.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper was to study the agreement between six ophthalmologists who manually marked the optic nerve head using fundus images. Four different parameters were considered from the manual marking images: (1) disc (area and centroid), (2) cup (area and centroid), (3) horizontal and vertical cup-to-disc ratios, and (4) including the previous two parameters for both horizontal and vertical cup-to-disc ratios, and investigated the comprehensive agreement and accuracy among all the ophthalmologists. The best agreement percentage for all the parameters combined was between ophthalmologists number one and three for 44 % of images, and the best accuracy was for ophthalmologist number one with 77.4 % of 315 total tested images. Our analysis shows that more than half of the images in the dataset were not agreed upon when considering all the parameters together.Keywords: Fundus images; Manual marking; Ophthalmology; Optic cup; Optic disc
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27573541 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-016-0329-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Ophthalmol ISSN: 0165-5701 Impact factor: 2.031