Literature DB >> 2705920

Agreement between clinicians and an image analyzer in estimating cup-to-disc ratios.

R Varma1, G L Spaeth, W C Steinmann, L J Katz.   

Abstract

We studied optic disc photographs of 35 eyes to determine the level of agreement between estimates of vertical and horizontal cup-to-disc ratios (CDRs) provided by two clinicians and estimates of these ratios obtained using an image analyzer. We also evaluated the agreement of each clinician with himself and with the other clinician to provide a relative standard by which to judge agreement between the clinicians and the image analyzer. Agreement between the clinicians and the image analyzer was moderate. Differences of more than 0.2 disc diameters (DD) between the CDR estimates of clinicians and those obtained using the image analyzer were limited to discs having small (CDR of 0.4 DD or lower) or very large (CDR of 0.9 DD or higher) cups. The clinicians' agreement with themselves and with each other was substantial to near perfect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2705920     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1989.01070010540027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  17 in total

1.  Comparison between laser scanning tomography and computerised image analysis of the optic disc.

Authors:  A Azuara-Blanco; G L Spaeth; J Nicholl; I M Lanzl; J J Augsburger
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  A new digital optic disc stereo camera: intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of optic disc measurements.

Authors:  G N Shuttleworth; C H Khong; J P Diamond
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Comparison of optic nerve head assessment with a digital stereoscopic camera (discam), scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, and stereophotography.

Authors:  Anthony J Correnti; Gadi Wollstein; Lori Lyn Price; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Topographic changes in the optic disc in eyes with cotton-wool spots and primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  E Chihara; Y Honda
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  An optimal reference plane to detect glaucomatous nerve fiber layer abnormalities with computerized image analysis.

Authors:  J M Miller; J Caprioli
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  The accuracy and clinical application of predictive models for primary open-angle glaucoma in ocular hypertensive individuals.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 7.  Test-retest variability in structural parameters measured with glaucoma imaging devices.

Authors:  Makoto Araie
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Agreement among ophthalmologists in marking the optic disc and optic cup in fundus images.

Authors:  Ahmed Almazroa; Sami Alodhayb; Essameldin Osman; Eslam Ramadan; Mohammed Hummadi; Mohammed Dlaim; Muhannad Alkatee; Kaamran Raahemifar; Vasudevan Lakshminarayanan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Glaucoma Specialist Optic Disc Margin, Rim Margin, and Rim Width Discordance in Glaucoma and Glaucoma Suspect Eyes.

Authors:  Seung Woo Hong; Helen Koenigsman; Ruojin Ren; Hongli Yang; Stuart K Gardiner; Juan Reynaud; Robert M Kinast; Steven L Mansberger; Brad Fortune; Shaban Demirel; Claude F Burgoyne
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 10. Variability among academic glaucoma subspecialists in assessing optic disc notching.

Authors:  D E Gaasterland; B Blackwell; L G Dally; J Caprioli; L J Katz; F Ederer
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2001
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.