| Literature DB >> 27555858 |
Xiaojing Dang1, Erbao Liu1, Yinfeng Liang1, Qiangming Liu2, Caleb M Breria1, Delin Hong1.
Abstract
Stigma traits are very important for hybrid seed production in Oryza sativa, which is a self-pollinated crop; however, the genetic mechanism controlling the traits is poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the phenotypic data of 227 accessions across 2 years and assessed their genotypic variation with 249 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. By combining phenotypic and genotypic data, a genome-wide association (GWA) map was generated. Large phenotypic variations in stigma length (STL), stigma brush-shaped part length (SBPL) and stigma non-brush-shaped part length (SNBPL) were found. Significant positive correlations were identified among stigma traits. In total, 2072 alleles were detected among 227 accessions, with an average of 8.3 alleles per SSR locus. GWA mapping detected 6 quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for the STL, 2 QTLs for the SBPL and 7 QTLs for the SNBPL. Eleven, 5, and 12 elite alleles were found for the STL, SBPL, and SNBPL, respectively. Optimal cross designs were predicted for improving the target traits. The detected genetic variation in stigma traits and QTLs provides helpful information for cloning candidate STL genes and breeding rice cultivars with longer STLs in the future.Entities:
Keywords: Oryza sativa; QTL detection; elite allele; genome-wide association mapping; stigma traits
Year: 2016 PMID: 27555858 PMCID: PMC4977947 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01188
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Scene of F. (A) Scene of F1 hybrid seed production in the heading stage. (B) Scene of F1 hybrid seed production in the filling stage. (C) Exerted stigmas (arrowheads) after the palea and lemma enclosed.
Figure 2Morphology of pistil and the stigma in rice. (A) Names of rice pistil parts defined in this study. (B) Stigma morphology of Lianjing 4hao, with the minimum value of STL among 227 accessions. (C) Stigma morphology of Nongxiang 21, with the maximum value of STL among 227 accessions. (D) Stigma morphology of Yuedao 23. (E) Stigma morphology of Yuedao 34. The STL of Yuedao 23 and Yuedao 34 are equal. For Yuedao 23, SBPL is shorter than SNBPL. For Yuedao 34, SBPL is longer than SNBPL. Scale bar, 1 mm.
Phenotypic characteristics for stigma length and grain length traits in 227 rice accessions across 2 years.
| Stigma length (mm) | 2013 | 2.89 | 1.28 | 1.79 | 0.29 | 0.74 | 0.25 | 92.6 |
| 2014 | 2.97 | 1.32 | 1.82 | 0.27 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 94.9 | |
| Stigma brush-shaped part length (mm) | 2013 | 1.65 | 0.58 | 1.08 | 0.18 | 0.34 | 0.25 | 94.4 |
| 2014 | 1.58 | 0.62 | 1.07 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.05 | 91.2 | |
| Stigma non-brush-shaped part length (mm) | 2013 | 1.76 | 0.17 | 0.71 | 0.20 | 0.36 | 2.55 | 85.6 |
| 2014 | 1.46 | 0.21 | 0.76 | 0.16 | 0.27 | 1.56 | 91.5 | |
| Grain length (mm) | 2013 | 12.91 | 6.59 | 8.24 | 1.16 | 1.65 | 2.88 | 98.7 |
| 2014 | 12.73 | 6.45 | 8.16 | 1.12 | 1.70 | 3.56 | 97.9 |
The size of sample is 227 accessions.
General linear correlation analysis for stigma length and grain length traits.
| STL | - | |||
| SBPL | 0.80 | - | ||
| SNBPL | 0.79 | 0.26 | - | |
| GL | 0.71 | 0.48 | 0.65 | - |
Significant at P < 0.01.
Figure 3Average individual microsatellite allele size for the seven subgroups (Groups 1–7). The standard error is presented.
Comparison of D′ values for pair-wise SSR loci in seven subpopulations.
| Group 1 | 1713 | 9.05 | 41 | 45 | 39 | 16 | 14 | 0.399 |
| Group 2 | 1455 | 21.24 | 82 | 68 | 68 | 26 | 65 | 0.459 |
| Group 3 | 1611 | 6.70 | 33 | 36 | 15 | 9 | 15 | 0.407 |
| Group 4 | 772 | 13.60 | 28 | 26 | 22 | 23 | 6 | 0.412 |
| Group 5 | 658 | 13.53 | 15 | 26 | 20 | 18 | 10 | 0.468 |
| Group 6 | 1108 | 10.92 | 22 | 42 | 16 | 21 | 20 | 0.464 |
| Group 7 | 425 | 20.24 | 21 | 26 | 14 | 8 | 17 | 0.449 |
LD means linkage disequilibrium.
Ratio between the number of intrachromosomal significant LD locus pairs and total number of significant LD locus pairs.
D′ means standardized disequilibrium coefficients (Farnir et al., .
Figure 4Relationship between D′ value and genetic distance of syntenic marker pairs in subpopulations.
Pairwise estimates of .
| Group 1 | - | ||||||
| Group 2 | 0.640 | - | |||||
| Group 3 | 0.715 | 0.604 | - | ||||
| Group 4 | 0.723 | 0.641 | 0.752 | - | |||
| Group 5 | 0.719 | 0.633 | 0.750 | 0.748 | - | ||
| Group 6 | 0.615 | 0.162 | 0.677 | 0.727 | 0.731 | - | |
| Group 7 | 0.625 | 0.832 | 0.779 | 0.810 | 0.686 | 0.684 | - |
Marker-trait associations with .
| STL | RM5389 | 1 | 142.4 | 9.00E-04 | 0.107 | 6.67E-03 | 9.60E-03 | 0.076 | 1.11E-02 |
| RM450 | 2 | 122.8 | 4.31E-02 | 0.049 | 4.67E-02 | 3.27E-02 | 0.054 | 3.33E-02 | |
| RM7598 | 2 | 126.4 | 1.74E-04 | 0.100 | 3.33E-03 | 1.55E-03 | 0.075 | 5.56E-03 | |
| RM280 | 4 | 128.9 | 5.24E-03 | 0.038 | 1.33E-02 | 1.45E-02 | 0.029 | 1.67E-02 | |
| RM7579 | 6 | 84.5 | 1.52E-02 | 0.051 | 3.33E-02 | 4.44E-02 | 0.038 | 4.91E-02 | |
| 6 | 124.4 | 4.86E-03 | 0.125 | 1.00E-02 | 2.37E-02 | 0.089 | 2.78E-02 | ||
| SBPL | RM280 | 4 | 128.9 | 3.02E-02 | 0.022 | 1.67E-02 | 2.50E-02 | 0.032 | 2.50E-02 |
| 6 | 53.0 | 3.69E-02 | 0.068 | 4.17E-02 | 3.74E-02 | 0.061 | 4.17E-02 | ||
| SNBPL | RM5389 | 1 | 142.4 | 3.31E-03 | 0.088 | 7.14E-03 | 2.06E-02 | 0.067 | 2.08E-02 |
| RM450 | 2 | 122.8 | 8.55E-03 | 0.070 | 2.14E-02 | 2.23E-03 | 0.084 | 8.33E-03 | |
| RM7598 | 2 | 126.4 | 8.55E-04 | 0.086 | 3.57E-03 | 1.22E-03 | 0.082 | 4.17E-03 | |
| RM280 | 4 | 128.9 | 7.18E-03 | 0.035 | 1.79E-02 | 1.10E-02 | 0.032 | 1.25E-02 | |
| 4 | 129.6 | 4.31E-02 | 0.032 | 4.64E-02 | 4.55E-02 | 0.031 | 4.58E-02 | ||
| 6 | 124.4 | 6.41E-03 | 0.112 | 1.43E-02 | 3.48E-02 | 0.082 | 3.75E-02 | ||
| 11 | 1.7 | 3.65E-03 | 0.129 | 1.07E-02 | 4.07E-02 | 0.081 | 4.17E-02 | ||
| GL | 1 | 126.5 | 1.39E-03 | 0.114 | 1.47E-02 | 3.05E-04 | 0.141 | 1.25E-02 | |
| 1 | 142.4 | 3.04E-04 | 0.124 | 1.18E-02 | 6.11E-04 | 0.116 | 1.56E-02 | ||
| RM450 | 2 | 122.8 | 6.81E-06 | 0.156 | 5.88E-03 | 8.77E-07 | 0.182 | 6.25E-03 | |
| RM7598 | 2 | 126.4 | 1.05E-08 | 0.207 | 2.94E-03 | 1.99E-09 | 0.229 | 3.13E-03 | |
| RM282 | 3 | 55.8 | 1.26E-02 | 0.090 | 2.65E-02 | 4.08E-03 | 0.111 | 2.19E-02 | |
| RM6712 | 3 | 158.2 | 4.35E-02 | 0.055 | 4.41E-02 | 2.52E-02 | 0.064 | 4.06E-02 | |
| RM6314 | 4 | 41.5 | 3.52E-02 | 0.058 | 4.12E-02 | 2.87E-02 | 0.056 | 4.38E-02 | |
| 4 | 128.9 | 2.79E-02 | 0.024 | 3.82E-02 | 3.44E-02 | 0.022 | 4.69E-02 | ||
| RM136 | 6 | 53.0 | 2.38E-02 | 0.081 | 3.24E-02 | 1.03E-02 | 0.094 | 2.81E-02 | |
| RM2530 | 7 | 53.4 | 1.87E-03 | 0.106 | 1.76E-02 | 1.04E-03 | 0.116 | 1.88E-02 | |
| RM6976 | 8 | 92.2 | 1.07E-02 | 0.087 | 2.35E-02 | 1.96E-02 | 0.077 | 3.44E-02 | |
| RM1125 | 10 | 46.8 | 1.04E-02 | 0.106 | 2.06E-02 | 6.29E-03 | 0.112 | 2.50E-02 | |
| 11 | 1.7 | 6.65E-05 | 0.218 | 8.82E-03 | 2.18E-05 | 0.229 | 9.38E-03 | ||
Markers in bold face means the new loci identified in this study.