| Literature DB >> 31948408 |
Nour Ali1,2,3,4, Dalu Li1,2, Moaz S Eltahawy1,2,5, Dina Abdulmajid1,2,6, Lal Bux1,2, Erbao Liu1,2, Xiaojing Dang1,2, Delin Hong7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Wet direct-seeded rice is a possible alternative to conventional puddled transplanted rice; the former uses less water and reduces labor requirements. Improving seed reserve utilization efficiency (SRUE) is a key factor in facilitating the application of this technology. However, the QTLs controlling this trait are poorly investigated. In this study, a genome-wide association study (GWAS) was conducted using a natural population composed of 542 accessions of rice (Oryza sativa L.) which were genotyped using 266 SSR markers. Large phenotypic variations in SRUE were found in the studied population.Entities:
Keywords: Association mapping; Direct seeding; Favorable alleles; Oryza sativa; Seed reserve utilization efficiency
Year: 2020 PMID: 31948408 PMCID: PMC6966888 DOI: 10.1186/s12863-020-0811-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Descriptive statistics of SRUE* (mg.mg− 1) in 542 rice accessions across 2 years
| Items | 2016 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| Mean (mg.mg− 1) | 0.518 | 0.526 |
| Minimum (mg.mg− 1) | 0.209 | 0.242 |
| Maximum (mg.mg− 1) | 0.962 | 0.917 |
| Standard Deviation (mg.mg− 1) | 0.129 | 0.113 |
| Skewness | 0.595 | 0.536 |
| Kurtosis | 0.253 | 0.165 |
| CV (%) | 23.80 | 21.52 |
| 99.72 | 99.89 |
*SRUE: seed reserve utilization efficiency
Fig. 1Changes in the number of subpopulations with a the log-likelihood function value, b with ∆K values
Fig. 2All 542-rice variety belonging to six subpopulations defined by STRUCRURE software. Identified sub-populations are POP1 (red color), POP2 (green color), POP3 (navy blue color), POP4 (yellow color), POP5 (purple color), POP6 (light blue color)
Fig. 3Neighbor-joining tree for the 542 accessions generated using Nei’s genetic distance
Pairwise estimates of Fst and Nei’s genetic distance among the 6 subpopulations
| Subpopulations | POP1 | POP2 | POP3 | POP4 | POP5 | POP6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POP1 | – | 0.50 | 0.65 | 0.50 | 0.46 | |
| POP2 | 0.31 | – | 0.59 | 0.47 | 0.58 | 0.51 |
| POP3 | 0.37 | 0.37 | – | 0.62 | 0.65 | |
| POP4 | 0.35 | 0.35 | – | 0.55 | 0.52 | |
| POP5 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.38 | – | 0.49 | |
| POP6 | 0.30 | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.36 | – |
Nei’s genetic distance estimates appear above the diagonal, and pairwise F appear below the diagonal. All F values are significant (P < 0.01)
D’ of LD for pairwise SSR loci each subpopulation
| Subpopulation | Number of significant LD locus pairs a | Number of significant LD locus pairs/Total number of locus pair (%) b | Frequency of D’ value ( | Mean of D’ c | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–0.2 | 0.2–0.4 | 0.41–0.6 | 0.61–0.8 | 0.81–1.0 | ||||
| POP1 | 1683 | 4.78 | 140 | 394 | 455 | 436 | 258 | 0.834 |
| POP2 | 1350 | 3.83 | 115 | 231 | 306 | 315 | 397 | 0.705 |
| POP3 | 1468 | 4.17 | 220 | 173 | 486 | 324 | 265 | 0.580 |
| POP4 | 1599 | 4.54 | 128 | 329 | 507 | 212 | 423 | 0.679 |
| POP5 | 1508 | 4.28 | 100 | 231 | 536 | 371 | 270 | 0.811 |
| POP6 | 1103 | 3.13 | 112 | 182 | 293 | 236 | 190 | 0.741 |
*a LD means linkage disequilibrium
b Ratio between the number of significant LD locus pairs and total number of locus pairs
c D′ means standardized disequilibrium coefficients
SSR marker loci associated with SRUE (PVE > 5%) and percentage of phenotypic variation explained by the locus derived from 266 markers and 506 rice accessions
| No# | Marker | Chrom | Position (cM) | 2016 | 2017 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PVEa (%) | FDRb | PVEa (%) | FDRb | ||||||
| 1 | RM128 | 1 | 123.2 | 0.003 | 5.85 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 5.91 | 0.003 |
| 2 | RM297 | 1 | 126.5 | 0.009 | 12.01 | 0.009 | 0.009 | 11.98 | 0.009 |
| 3 | RM525 | 2 | 143.7 | 0.007 | 6.40 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 6.42 | 0.007 |
| 4 | RM232 | 3 | 76.7 | 0.003 | 5.61 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 5.63 | 0.003 |
| 5 | RM3471 | 4 | 16.7 | 0.007 | 6.94 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 6.90 | 0.007 |
| 6 | RM5818 | 5 | 144.9 | 0.002 | 5.03 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 5.07 | 0.002 |
| 7 | 6 | 100.3 | 0.002 | 6.25 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 6.24 | 0.001 | |
| 0.001 | 7.18 | 7.23E-04 | 0.001 | 7.10 | 9.06E-04 | ||||
| 8 | RM3138 | 6 | 110.6 | 0.001 | 5.20 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 5.21 | 0.001 |
| 9 | RM3589 | 7 | 89.8 | 0.002 | 5.49 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 5.51 | 0.002 |
| 10 | RM281 | 8 | 128.1 | 0.006 | 5.62 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 5.55 | 0.007 |
| 11 | 9 | 57.7 | 0.002 | 5.24 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 5.22 | 0.002 | |
| 0.003 | 5.51 | 2.82E-03 | 0.003 | 5.52 | 2.73E-03 | ||||
| 12 | RM184 | 10 | 41.6 | 0.009 | 7.20 | 0.009 | 0.008 | 7.32 | 0.008 |
| 13 | RM5746 | 12 | 39.4 | 0.007 | 5.94 | 0.007 | 0.008 | 5.85 | 0.008 |
*a PVE: Percentage of phenotypic variation explained
b FDR, False discovery rate
Markers in bold font means the common loci identified by both GLM and MLM in this study and the rest by GLM only
Favorable alleles, their effects and typical carriers for SRUE of the 13 loci detected across 506 rice accessions in 2016 and 2017 (listed in descending order of phenotypic effect values)
| Marker-allele(bp) | Phenotypic effect value (mg.mg−1) | Typical carrier | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2017 | Mean | ||
| RM297–180 | 0.449 | 0.450 | 0.450 | Manyedao |
| RM297–175 | 0.437 | 0.444 | 0.441 | Daniaodao |
| RM184–225 | 0.432 | 0.430 | 0.431 | Yandao6 |
| RM184–215 | 0.413 | 0.418 | 0.416 | Daniaodao |
| RM184–205 | 0.376 | 0.383 | 0.379 | Manyedao |
| RM297–205 | 0.319 | 0.337 | 0.328 | Youzhiyueguang |
| RM184–270 | 0.299 | 0.316 | 0.307 | Youzhiyueguang |
| RM281–140 | 0.153 | 0.147 | 0.150 | Yandao6 |
| RM434–150 | 0.148 | 0.142 | 0.145 | Yue40 |
| RM5746–195 | 0.139 | 0.132 | 0.136 | Yandao6 |
| RM3589–210 | 0.141 | 0.131 | 0.136 | Yue77 |
| RM3471–110 | 0.1367 | 0.1297 | 0.1332 | Yue40 |
| RM5818–145 | 0.1365 | 0.1245 | 0.1305 | Yue40 |
| RM525–100 | 0.1338 | 0.1239 | 0.1289 | Yue7 |
| RM434–155 | 0.1311 | 0.126 | 0.1284 | Yue77 |
| RM5746–170 | 0.130 | 0.124 | 0.1270 | Manyedao |
| RM3589–85 | 0.124 | 0.115 | 0.119 | Yandao6 |
| RM525–110 | 0.122 | 0.113 | 0.118 | Jiaobaiyeqing |
| RM309–160 | 0.119 | 0.111 | 0.115 | Yue77 |
| RM3589–220 | 0.117 | 0.111 | 0.114 | Yue40 |
| RM3471–170 | 0.1154 | 0.110 | 0.113 | Eyingbaijingdao |
| RM232–115 | 0.116 | 0.108 | 0.112 | Yue77 |
| RM7309–135 | 0.106 | 0.096 | 0.101 | Manyedao |
Locus-allele in bold font are identified by both GLM and MLM in this study and the rest by GLM only
Favorable alleles carried by the superior parents for SRUE and corresponding phenotypic effect
| Code | Parental name | Favorable marker alleles and their phenotypic effect value (mg.mg−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL048 | Daniaodao | RM128–165 (0.0890) | RM297–175 (0.4407) | RM5746–180 (0.0723) |
| RM184–215 (0.4157) | RM3471–185 (0.0846) | |||
| RM232–160 (0.0751) | RM3589–100 (0.0593) | |||
| RM281–135 (0.0748) | RM525–135 (0.0691) | |||
| AL051 | Manyedao | RM128–165 (0.0890) | RM3138–110 (0.0517) | RM5818–150 (0.0836) |
| RM184–205 (0.3795) | RM434–150 (0.1451) | RM7309–135 (0.1010) | ||
| RM281–140 (0.1503) | RM525–135 (0.0691) | |||
| RM297–180 (0.4496) | RM5746–170 (0.1270) | |||
| AL053 | Baimangnuo | RM128–165 (0.0890) | RM3138–100 (0.0527) | RM5818–155 (0.0651) |
| RM184–215 (0.4157) | RM434–150 (0.1451) | RM7309–135 (0.1010) | ||
| RM281–140 (0.1503) | RM5746–175 (0.0929) | |||
| AL113 | Suwujing | RM232–160 (0.0751) | RM3471–135 (0.0573) | RM5818–155 (0.0651) |
| RM281–145 (0.1019) | RM3589–100 (0.0593) | RM7309–160 (0.0580) | ||
| RM3138–100 (0.0527) | RM434–155 (0.1284) | |||
| AL311 | Yue40 | RM128–150 (0.0792) | RM3138–110 (0.0517) | RM434–150 (0.1451) |
| RM232–120 (0.0973) | RM3471–110 (0.1332) | RM5818–145 (0.1305) | ||
| RM281–135 (0.0748) | RM3589–220 (0.1143) | RM7309–115 (0.0802) | ||
Prediction of optimal parental combinations, favorable allele number and increment for SRUE after pyramiding
| Code | Parental combinations | No. of positive favorable alleles predicted after crossing | SRUE increased after pyramiding (mg.mg−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AL311 × AL051 | Yue40 × Manyedao | 13 | 0.16 |
| AL311 × AL048 | Yue40 × Daniaodao | 12 | 0.15 |
| AL051 × AL113 | Manyedao × Suwujing | 13 | 0.14 |
| AL113 × AL053 | Suwujing × Baimangnuo | 13 | 0.14 |
| AL048 × AL113 | Daniaodao × Suwujing | 13 | 0.13 |
Fig. 4Un-hulled grains (above) and brown rice (down) of the favorable parents for improving of SRUE trait. Bar, 10 mm
Fig. 5Etiolated seedlings of 10-days old of the favorable parents for improving of SRUE trait. Bar, 10 mm
Comparison of SER (%) between high and low SRUE (mg.mg−1) groups in the soil experiment
| Variable | Mean (SD) | Mean difference (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERa (%) | High SRUE b | Low SRUE | 28.14 (26.16, 30.11) | 29.23 (27) | 0.000** |
| 71.28 (4.22) | 43.15 (1.54) | ||||
a SER rate: seedling establishment rate (%)
b SRUE: seed reserve utilization efficiency (mg.mg−1)
** p < 0.01
Fig. 6SER (%) bar graphic (with 95% CIs)