| Literature DB >> 29025391 |
Erbao Liu1, Siyuan Zeng1, Xiangong Chen1, Xiaojing Dang1, Lijun Liang1, Hui Wang1, Zhiyao Dong1, Yang Liu1, Delin Hong2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Poor grain plumpness (GP) is one of the main constraints to reaching the yield potential of hybrid rice.Entities:
Keywords: Association mapping; Elite allele; Genetic architecture; Grain plumpness; Rice
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29025391 PMCID: PMC5639755 DOI: 10.1186/s12863-017-0559-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Descriptive statistics for GP (%) for two years at three locations
| Location | Year | Mean ± SDa | Maximum | Minimum | CV (%)b |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YFd | 2013 | 94.33 ± 3.68 | 99.51 | 84.89 | 3.91 | 97.09 |
| 2014 | 93.47 ± 3.77 | 99.52 | 79.43 | 4.04 | 98.61 | |
| XFe | 2013 | 92.20 ± 3.89 | 99.33 | 77.89 | 4.22 | 96.75 |
| 2014 | 90.31 ± 3.72 | 98.37 | 78.23 | 4.12 | 96.45 | |
| JEFf | 2013 | 93.02 ± 3.20 | 99.55 | 82.66 | 3.44 | 95.22 |
| 2014 | 93.12 ± 3.12 | 99.17 | 83.25 | 3.35 | 96.95 |
a SD Standard deviation, b CV Coefficient of variation, c H Broad-sense heritability, d YF Yuanyang Farm, e XF Xinyang Farm, f JEF Jiangpu Experimental Farm
Fig. 1Population genetic architecture analysis of 160 varieties. Effects of changes in the log-likelihood function value (a) and the ΔK value (b) on the number of subpopulations, posterior probabilities of 160 varieties belonging to seven subpopulations (c) and the neighbour-joining tree for 160 varieties based on Nei’s genetic distance (d). Each variety is represented by a vertical bar. The coloured subsections within each vertical bar indicate the membership coefficients (Q) of that variety in different subpopulations. The identified subpopulations are SP1 (red), SP2 (green), SP3 (navy blue), SP4 (yellow), SP5 (purple), SP6 (light blue), and SP7 (brown)
Pairwise F ST and Nei’s genetic distance among the seven subpopulations
| Subpopulation | SP1 | SP2 | SP3 | SP4 | SP5 | SP6 | SP7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP1 | – | 0.6347 | 0.6673 | 0.7451 | 0.6875 | 0.6437 | 0.6671 |
| SP2 | 0.5548 | – | 0.6264 | 0.6933 | 0.6026 | 0.6304 | 0.6446 |
| SP3 | 0.7624 | 0.6821 | – | 0.5978 | 0.6388 | 0.6438 | 0.6235 |
| SP4 | 0.7465 | 0.6612 | 0.5576 | – | 0.7302 | 0.7072 | 0.7056 |
| SP5 | 0.6207 | 0.5032 | 0.6792 | 0.6607 | – | 0.6591 | 0.6743 |
| SP6 | 0.5844 | 0.6107 | 0.7482 | 0.7151 | 0.6235 | – | 0.6109 |
| SP7 | 0.6581 | 0.6664 | 0.7542 | 0.7346 | 0.6884 | 0.5558 | – |
Nei’s genetic distance is below the diagonal, and F ST is above the diagonal. All pairwise F ST values are significant (P < 0.01)
Percentages of significant (P < 0.01) locus pairs in LD
| Sub-population | Markers on the same chromosome | Markers on different chromosomes | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of locus pairs in LDa | Percentage of locus pairs (%) | No. of locus pairs in LDa | Percentage of locus pairs (%) | No. of locus pairs in LDa | Percentage of locus pairs (%) | |
| SP1 | 77 (958) | 8.04 | 857 (10532) | 8.14 | 934 (11490) | 8.13 |
| SP2 | 107 (1449) | 7.38 | 1226 (16454) | 7.45 | 1333 (17903) | 7.45 |
| SP3 | 495 (1048) | 47.23 | 5265 (11768) | 44.74 | 5760 (12816) | 44.94 |
| SP4 | 11 (353) | 3.12 | 93 (4065) | 2.29 | 104 (4418) | 2.35 |
| SP5 | 49 (1090) | 4.50 | 566 (11782) | 4.80 | 615 (12872) | 4.78 |
| SP6 | 60 (1047) | 5.73 | 583 (11763) | 4.96 | 643 (12810) | 5.02 |
| SP7 | 46 (1048) | 4.39 | 538 (12074) | 4.46 | 584 (13122) | 4.45 |
| All | 1903 (1983) | 95.97 | 20811 (21874) | 95.14 | 22,714 (23857) | 95.21 |
aThe values in parentheses are the total numbers of locus pairs
Elite alleles with positive phenotypic effects for GP and typical carrier varieties
| Marker | PVEa (%) | Elite allele (bp) | Phenotypic effect value (%) | Typical carrier variety | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YFb | XFc | JEFd | Mean | |||||||
| 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | |||||
| RM5340 | 16.7 | 95 | 0.29 | 0.65 | 0.47 | Yuedao 5 | ||||
| 155 | 1.94 | 1.77 | 1.86 | Yazihuang | ||||||
| 205 | 2.36 | 2.51 | 2.44 | Yuedao 22 | ||||||
| RM5480 | 8.42 | 165 | 1.8 | 1.72 | 1.86 | 1.79 | Yuedao 5 | |||
| 200 | 0.87 | 1.75 | 1.34 | 1.32 | Ligengqing | |||||
| RM148 | 9.93 | 125 | 1.34 | 1.29 | 1.32 | Huangsanshi | ||||
| RM505 | 17.13 | 160 | 2.15 | 1.76 | 1.96 | Qiutiandaxiedao | ||||
| 170 | 2.74 | 2.49 | 2.62 | Maozitou | ||||||
| 180 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.47 | Chiguhong | ||||||
| RM1235 | 8.76 | 120 | 0.52 | 1.63 | 1.63 | 1.26 | Yuedao 5 | |||
| RM511 | 13.15 | 130 | 2.48 | 2.3 | 2.39 | Qiaobinghuang | ||||
| 135 | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.28 | Yuedao 5 | ||||||
| RM5479 | 21.46 | 210 | 1.77 | 1.88 | 1.83 | Ligengqing | ||||
| 215 | 2.72 | 2.23 | 2.48 | Zaoguangtou | ||||||
| 225 | 0.58 | 0.83 | 0.7 | Yuedao 5 | ||||||
a PVE Percentage of phenotypic variation explained, b YF Yuanyang Farm, c XF Xinyang Farm, d JEF Jiangpu Experimental Farm
Parental combinations predicted for GP improvement
| Parental combination predicted | Number of elite alleles predicted | GP improvement predicted (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Yuedao 5 × Ligengqing | 7 | 13.07 |
| Yuedao 22 × Ligengqing | 7 | 13.07 |
| Yazihuang × Ligengqing | 7 | 13.07 |
| Yazihuang × Huangsanshi | 7 | 13.07 |
| Yuedao 22 × Yuedao 5 | 7 | 12.52 |
| Yazihuang × Yuedao 22 | 7 | 12.52 |
| Yuedao 5 × Zaoguangtou | 7 | 12.33 |
| Yuedao 5 × Huangsanshi | 7 | 11.68 |
| Yuedao 5 × Qiaobinghuang | 7 | 10.55 |
| Yuedao 5 × Yazihuang | 6 | 8.37 |
Fig. 2Unhulled rice grains and brown rice grains of the investigated varieties in the predicted combinations for GP improvement (bar = 1 cm)
Fig. 3Average standardized individual allele sizes of the seven subpopulations. The mean, standard deviation, and number of varieties per subpopulation are identified
Differences in the average standardized individual allele sizes among the seven subpopulations
| Subpopulation | SP1 | SP2 | SP3 | SP4 | SP5 | SP6 | SP7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP1 | |||||||
| SP2 | −1.51 | ||||||
| SP3 | 3.98** | 6.21** | |||||
| SP4 | 4.41** | 6.44** | 2.02 | ||||
| SP5 | 0.37 | 1.32 | −2.89** | −3.67** | |||
| SP6 | 0.05 | 1.25 | −4.09** | −4.24** | −0.32 | ||
| SP7 | −0.48 | 0.45 | −4.30** | −4.39** | −0.59 | −0.53 |
**indicates that the difference between two subpopulations is significant at P < 0.01