| Literature DB >> 29312380 |
Xiaojing Dang1, Bingjie Fang1, Xiangong Chen1, Dalu Li1, Ognigamal Sowadan1, Zhiyao Dong1, Erbao Liu1, Dong She1, Guocan Wu1, Yinfeng Liang1, Delin Hong1.
Abstract
The panicle exsertion length (PEL) in rice (Oryza sativa L.) is an important trait for hybrid seed production. We investigated the PEL in a chromosome segment substitution line (CSSL) population consisting of 66 lines and a natural population composed of 540 varieties. In the CSSL population, a total of seven QTLs for PEL were detected across two environments. The percentage of phenotypic variance explained (PVE) ranged from 10.22 to 50.18%, and the additive effect ranged from -1.77 to 6.47 cm. Among the seven QTLs, qPEL10.2 had the largest PVE, 44.05 and 50.18%, with an additive effect of 5.91 and 6.47 cm in 2015 and in 2016, respectively. In the natural population, 13 SSR marker loci were detected that were associated with PEL in all four environments, with the PVE ranging from 1.20 to 6.26%. Among the 13 loci, 7 were novel. The RM5746-170 bp allele had the largest phenotypic effect (5.11 cm), and the typical carrier variety was Qiaobinghuang. An RM5620-RM6100 region harboring the EUI2 locus on chromosome 10 was detected in both populations. The sequencing results showed that the accessions with a shorter PEL contained the A base, while the accessions with a longer PEL contained the G base at the 1,475 bp location of the EUI2 gene.Entities:
Keywords: Oryza sativa; chromosome segment substitution line population; favorable marker allele; hybrid seed production; natural population; panicle exsertion length
Year: 2017 PMID: 29312380 PMCID: PMC5732986 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02112
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Scene of F1 hybrid seed production in the filling stage.
Figure 2Phenotypes of the maintainer line Zhen 257B, showing no panicle enclosure, and the male-sterile line Zhen 257A, showing panicle enclosure. (A) Plants of Zhen 257A and Zhen 257B at the filling stage on the plot. Individual plants of Zhen 257A (B) and Zhen 257B (C) at the filling stage. Scale bar, 20 cm.
Phenotypic values of the PEL of parents and IIA-CSSLs across two environments.
| E1 | 2.0 ± 1.2 | 3.3 ± 1.2 | 2.7 | 2.9 ± 3.1 | −2.9–12.6 | 6.7 | 92.5 |
| E2 | 2.0 ± 1.2 | 3.1 ± 0.5 | 2.6 | 2.9 ± 3.2 | −3.3–11.7 | 8.9 | 95.6 |
E1 means 2015 in Nanjing; E2 means 2016 in Nanjing.
indicate significance at the 5 and 1% level, respectively.
QTLs detected for the PEL trait and their genetic parameters in IIA-CSSL population across two environments.
| 1 | RM562 | 14.77 | 6.72 | −3.87 | 18.92 | – | – | – | |
| 1 | RM6696 | 39.98 | 6.41 | 3.10 | 17.84 | 7.74 | 4.00 | 28.37 | |
| 8 | RM3572 | 3.93 | – | – | – | 4.18 | −1.77 | 13.74 | |
| 10 | RM5620 | 17.40 | – | – | – | 10.53 | −3.88 | 43.00 | |
| 10 | RM6100 | 19.35 | 12.51 | 5.91 | 44.05 | 11.73 | 6.47 | 50.18 | |
| 11 | RM224 | 29.52 | 4.76 | 2.26 | 12.44 | – | – | – | |
| 12 | RM1246 | 19.26 | 4.06 | 2.15 | 10.22 | – | – | – | |
E1 means 2015 in Nanjing; E2 means 2016 in Nanjing.
Phenotypic characteristics of the PEL (cm) based on 540 rice accessions in natural population across four environments.
| E1 | 6.4 | 3.9 | 16.7 | −5.8 | −0.04 | −0.05 | 93.4 |
| E2 | 6.1 | 3.7 | 16.5 | −5.9 | 0.04 | −0.08 | 92.3 |
| E3 | 6.1 | 3.8 | 16.6 | −5.7 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 92.7 |
| E4 | 6.1 | 3.7 | 16.6 | −5.8 | 0.01 | −0.06 | 91.4 |
E1 means 2015 in Nanjing; E2 means 2016 in Nanjing; E3 means 2015 in Yuanyang; E4 means 2016 in Yuanyang.
Figure 3Morphology of the panicle showing the PEL in rice. (A) Panicle of accession Hongyin 1009, showing a minimum value of the PEL. (B) Panicle of accession Nannongjing 62401. (C) Panicle of accession Wujing 68. (D) Panicle of accession Xudao 2hao. (E) Panicle of accession Shenlenuo, showing a maximum value of the PEL. Scale bar, 3 cm.
Marker associated with PEL at P-values < 0.05, their equivalent false discovery rate probability (FDR), proportion of PVE, and marker position on chromosome derived from 262 markers and 483 rice accessions.
| RM283 | 1 | 4.89 | 1.69E-02 | 3.27 | 1.84E-02 | 3.45E-02 | 2.86 | 3.61E-02 | 1.89E-02 | 3.20 | 2.94E-02 | 4.49E-02 | 2.72 | 4.50E-02 |
| RM7288 | 2 | 9.03 | 2.28E-02 | 4.86 | 2.50E-02 | 4.70E-02 | 4.26 | 5.00E-02 | 9.94E-03 | 5.62 | 1.47E-02 | 9.22E-03 | 5.68 | 1.25E-02 |
| RM6266 | 3 | 23.82 | 1.92E-02 | 2.44 | 2.05E-02 | 2.78E-02 | 2.24 | 3.06E-02 | 4.85E-02 | 1.93 | 5.00E-02 | 3.06E-02 | 2.15 | 3.50E-02 |
| RM16 | 3 | 23.13 | 2.22E-02 | 1.20 | 2.27E-02 | 1.24E-02 | 1.44 | 1.39E-02 | 1.52E-02 | 1.33 | 2.35E-02 | 7.00E-03 | 1.63 | 1.00E-02 |
| RM159 | 5 | 0.49 | 2.57E-02 | 4.81 | 2.73E-02 | 3.32E-02 | 4.62 | 3.38E-02 | 4.59E-02 | 4.29 | 4.71E-02 | 1.98E-02 | 4.96 | 2.25E-02 |
| RM276 | 6 | 6.23 | 3.50E-02 | 3.11 | 3.64E-02 | 3.21E-02 | 3.16 | 3.72E-02 | 3.25E-02 | 3.20 | 3.53E-02 | 3.35E-02 | 3.20 | 3.75E-02 |
| RM6811 | 6 | 29.23 | 1.25E-02 | 5.36 | 1.36E-02 | 1.94E-02 | 4.83 | 2.22E-02 | 3.02E-03 | 6.26 | 8.82E-03 | 6.47E-03 | 5.69 | 7.50E-03 |
| RM152 | 8 | 0.68 | 3.69E-02 | 3.01 | 3.81E-02 | 4.66E-02 | 2.86 | 4.72E-02 | 1.27E-02 | 3.67 | 1.76E-02 | 9.93E-03 | 3.79 | 1.50E-02 |
| RM524 | 9 | 17.64 | 1.38E-03 | 4.85 | 2.27E-03 | 6.56E-04 | 3.12 | 2.78E-03 | 1.03E-03 | 5.01 | 2.94E-03 | 6.49E-04 | 5.28 | 2.50E-03 |
| RM410 | 9 | 12.92 | 3.97E-02 | 2.51 | 4.09E-02 | 1.31E-02 | 3.24 | 1.67E-02 | 1.76E-02 | 3.14 | 1.98E-02 | 1.71E-02 | 3.15 | 2.00E-02 |
| RM6100 | 10 | 17.40 | 3.78E-03 | 2.50 | 6.82E-03 | 3.00E-03 | 2.57 | 5.56E-03 | 3.20E-03 | 2.56 | 3.65E-02 | 1.53E-02 | 2.84 | 1.75E-02 |
| RM269 | 10 | 19.35 | 4.81E-02 | 2.98 | 5.00E-02 | 4.21E-02 | 3.30 | 4.44E-02 | 3.31E-02 | 3.37 | 3.82E-02 | 4.28E-02 | 3.47 | 4.70E-02 |
| RM5746 | 12 | 5.09 | 3.67E-03 | 5.31 | 4.55E-03 | 4.19E-03 | 5.02 | 8.33E-03 | 1.50E-03 | 5.71 | 5.88E-03 | 2.11E-03 | 5.49 | 5.00E-03 |
E1 means 2015 in Nanjing; E2 means 2016 in Nanjing; E3 means 2015 in Yuanyang; E4 means 2016 in Yuanyang.
Figure 4Gene sequence and deduced peptide sequence alignment of EUI2 between two parents (A7444 and II-32B) and Nipponbare. (A) Gene sequence. We show only the alignment results of the variance sequence; the alignment results of the no-difference sequence are not shown. (B) Deduced peptide sequence.