Literature DB >> 2754110

Kinematic and electromyographic responses to perturbation of the jaw.

S Shaiman1.   

Abstract

The task-dependent organization of sensorimotor mechanisms during the production of speech was investigated using a perturbation paradigm. Six subjects received unanticipated jaw perturbations before and during tongue elevation for [aedae], in which the lips do not participate, and bilabial closure for [aebae], in which the tongue does not participate. A strain gauge system was used to monitor inferior-superior displacements of the upper lip, lower lip, and jaw, while hooked-wire electrodes monitored muscle activity in various muscles of the lips, jaw, and tongue. Results indicated significant compensatory kinematic adjustments to jaw perturbations in the lips and/or jaw during [aebae], but no labial compensations during [aedae] (with the exception of one subject). EMG responses were inconsistent and not necessarily indicative of the kinematic findings. Individual subjects responded to perturbations reliably but differently, using different combinations of involved articulators to achieve bilabial closure and lingua-alveolar contact. The current study supports earlier research which suggests that the components of the motor system are flexibly assembled, based on the requirements of the specific task. That is, compensatory responses to sensory information occur only when such responses are functionally necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2754110     DOI: 10.1121/1.398223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production.

Authors:  Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Compensation for pitch-shifted auditory feedback during the production of Mandarin tone sequences.

Authors:  Yi Xu; Charles R Larson; Jay J Bauer; Timothy C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  fMRI investigation of unexpected somatosensory feedback perturbation during speech.

Authors:  Elisa Golfinopoulos; Jason A Tourville; Jason W Bohland; Satrajit S Ghosh; Alfonso Nieto-Castanon; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Probing the independence of formant control using altered auditory feedback.

Authors:  Ewen N MacDonald; David W Purcell; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort.

Authors:  Charmayne M L Hughes; Jeffrey M Haddad; Elizabeth A Franz; Howard N Zelaznik; Joong Hyun Ryu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The Orofacial Somatosensory System Is Modulated During Speech Planning and Production.

Authors:  Brianna J McGuffin; Julie M Liss; Ayoub Daliri
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Discrete constriction locations describe a comprehensive range of vocal tract shapes in the Maeda model.

Authors:  Jessica L Gaines; Kwang S Kim; Benjamin Parrell; Vikram Ramanarayanan; Srikantan S Nagarajan; John F Houde
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2021-12-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.