OBJECTIVE: The current study was aimed at the investigation of differences in response to photoinactivation between methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) isolates. Moreover, we aimed to elucidate if the observed variation resulted from antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and strains' susceptibility to antibiotic therapy. BACKGROUND DATA: Because of the emergence of multidrug resistance, the development of alternative antimicrobial strategies seems to be required. The concept of photodynamic inactivation (PDI) involves cell exposure to appropriate wavelength light that leads to the excitation of photosensitizer molecules, resulting in the production of reactive oxygen species responsible for cell inactivation and death. Recently, we have demonstrated a strain-dependent response of S. aureus to photoinactivation, and observed elevated resistance to PDI among MRSA strains. Nevertheless, the mechanism underlying this phenomenon remains unexplained. METHODS: S. aureus response to protoporphyrin IX (PPIX)-mediated photoinactivation was studied for 424 MRSA/MSSA isolates. VITEK 2 Advanced Expert System was used to detect antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and strains' susceptibility to antibiotictherapy. RESULTS: Data obtained demonstrated that MRSA are significantly more resistant to photoinactivation than MSSA strains; however, the difference observed did not result from antimicrobial susceptibility or resistance mechanisms. Furthermore, regardless of the strains' origin, a similar effectiveness of PDI could be achieved. Moreover, it was determined that the ability to form biofilms in vitro, and the presence of mec element, does not explain the observed differences between MRSA and MSSA strains. CONCLUSIONS: PDI could be highly effective against multidrug resistant pathogens as well as their naïve counterparts. Nevertheless, regardless of the antimicrobial resistance mechanism, the difference in response to PDI between MRSA and MSSA exists.
OBJECTIVE: The current study was aimed at the investigation of differences in response to photoinactivation between methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) isolates. Moreover, we aimed to elucidate if the observed variation resulted from antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and strains' susceptibility to antibiotic therapy. BACKGROUND DATA: Because of the emergence of multidrug resistance, the development of alternative antimicrobial strategies seems to be required. The concept of photodynamic inactivation (PDI) involves cell exposure to appropriate wavelength light that leads to the excitation of photosensitizer molecules, resulting in the production of reactive oxygen species responsible for cell inactivation and death. Recently, we have demonstrated a strain-dependent response of S. aureus to photoinactivation, and observed elevated resistance to PDI among MRSA strains. Nevertheless, the mechanism underlying this phenomenon remains unexplained. METHODS:S. aureus response to protoporphyrin IX (PPIX)-mediated photoinactivation was studied for 424 MRSA/MSSA isolates. VITEK 2 Advanced Expert System was used to detect antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and strains' susceptibility to antibiotictherapy. RESULTS: Data obtained demonstrated that MRSA are significantly more resistant to photoinactivation than MSSA strains; however, the difference observed did not result from antimicrobial susceptibility or resistance mechanisms. Furthermore, regardless of the strains' origin, a similar effectiveness of PDI could be achieved. Moreover, it was determined that the ability to form biofilms in vitro, and the presence of mec element, does not explain the observed differences between MRSA and MSSA strains. CONCLUSIONS: PDI could be highly effective against multidrug resistant pathogens as well as their naïve counterparts. Nevertheless, regardless of the antimicrobial resistance mechanism, the difference in response to PDI between MRSA and MSSA exists.
Authors: D M Livermore; M Struelens; J Amorim; F Baquero; J Bille; R Canton; S Henning; S Gatermann; A Marchese; H Mittermayer; C Nonhoff; K J Oakton; F Praplan; H Ramos; G C Schito; J Van Eldere; J Verhaegen; J Verhoef; M R Visser Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Alessandra R Lima; Cicera M Silva; Cynthia S A Caires; Esmael D Prado; Luciana R P Rocha; Isaias Cabrini; Eduardo J Arruda; Samuel L Oliveira; Anderson R L Caires Journal: Insects Date: 2018-08-30 Impact factor: 2.769
Authors: Arianna De Mori; Richard S Jones; Matteo Cretella; Guido Cerri; Roger R Draheim; Eugen Barbu; Gianluca Tozzi; Marta Roldo Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-03-26 Impact factor: 5.923