Literature DB >> 27526871

Cell-Free DNA Screening: Complexities and Challenges of Clinical Implementation.

Matthew R Grace1, Emily Hardisty2, Sarah K Dotters-Katz1, Neeta L Vora3, Jeffrey A Kuller4.   

Abstract

Screening for fetal aneuploidy in pregnant women using cell-free DNA has increased dramatically since the technology became commercially available in 2011. Since that time, numerous trials have demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity to screen for common aneuploidies in high-risk populations. Studies assessing the performance of these tests in low-risk populations have also demonstrated improved detection rates compared with traditional, serum-based screening strategies. Concurrent with the increased use of this technology has been a decrease in invasive procedures (amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling). As the technology becomes more widely understood, available, and utilized, challenges regarding its clinical implementation have become apparent. Some of these challenges include test failures, false-positive and false-negative results, limitations in positive predictive value in low-prevalence populations, and potential maternal health implications of abnormal results. In addition, commercial laboratories are expanding screening beyond common aneuploidies to include microdeletion screening and whole genome screening. This review article is intended to provide the practicing obstetrician with a summary of the complexities of cell-free DNA screening and the challenges of implementing it in the clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27526871      PMCID: PMC5548289          DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv        ISSN: 0029-7828            Impact factor:   2.347


  78 in total

Review 1.  Uses and abuses of screening tests.

Authors:  David A Grimes; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-03-09       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Detection Rates for Aneuploidy by First-Trimester and Sequential Screening.

Authors:  Rebecca J Baer; Monica C Flessel; Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski; Sara Goldman; Louanne Hudgins; Andrew D Hull; Mary E Norton; Robert J Currier
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: ethical issues explored.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Suzanne G M Frints; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Genome-wide fetal aneuploidy detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi; Lawrence D Platt; James D Goldberg; Alfred Z Abuhamad; Amy J Sehnert; Richard P Rava
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Noninvasive prenatal testing goes global.

Authors:  Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Mollie A Minear; Anthony Hung; Megan Allyse
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 17.956

6.  Cell free DNA testing-interpretation of results using an online calculator.

Authors:  Matthew R Grace; Emily Hardisty; Noah S Green; Emily Davidson; Alison M Stuebe; Neeta L Vora
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Single-nucleotide polymorphism-based noninvasive prenatal screening in a high-risk and low-risk cohort.

Authors:  Eugene Pergament; Howard Cuckle; Bernhard Zimmermann; Milena Banjevic; Styrmir Sigurjonsson; Allison Ryan; Megan P Hall; Michael Dodd; Phil Lacroute; Melissa Stosic; Nikhil Chopra; Nathan Hunkapiller; Dennis E Prosen; Sallie McAdoo; Zachary Demko; Asim Siddiqui; Matthew Hill; Matthew Rabinowitz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  NIPT in a clinical setting: an analysis of uptake in the first months of clinical availability.

Authors:  Joanne B Taylor; Valerie Y Chock; Louanne Hudgins
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First Trimester Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening for Fetal Trisomies in the United States.

Authors:  Brandon S Walker; Richard E Nelson; Brian R Jackson; David G Grenache; Edward R Ashwood; Robert L Schmidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An Economic Analysis of Cell-Free DNA Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in the US General Pregnancy Population.

Authors:  Peter Benn; Kirsten J Curnow; Steven Chapman; Steven N Michalopoulos; John Hornberger; Matthew Rabinowitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Genetic Basis for Congenital Heart Disease: Revisited: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Mary Ella Pierpont; Martina Brueckner; Wendy K Chung; Vidu Garg; Ronald V Lacro; Amy L McGuire; Seema Mital; James R Priest; William T Pu; Amy Roberts; Stephanie M Ware; Bruce D Gelb; Mark W Russell
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Genetic Basis of Human Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Shannon N Nees; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 9.708

3.  Factors affecting cell-free DNA fetal fraction: statistical analysis of 13,661 maternal plasmas for non-invasive prenatal screening.

Authors:  Yaping Hou; Jiexia Yang; Yiming Qi; Fangfang Guo; Haishan Peng; Dongmei Wang; Yixia Wang; Xiaohui Luo; Yi Li; Aihua Yin
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.639

4.  Donor-derived Cell-free DNA: Advancing a Novel Assay to New Heights in Renal Transplantation.

Authors:  Rohan S Paul; Ismail Almokayad; Ashte Collins; Dominic Raj; Muralidaran Jagadeesan
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-02-04

5.  A placental trisomy 2 detected by NIPT evolved in a fetal small Supernumerary Marker Chromosome (sSMC).

Authors:  Justyna Domaradzka; Marta Deperas; Ewa Obersztyn; Anna Kucińska-Chahwan; Nathalie Brison; Kris Van Den Bogaert; Tomasz Roszkowski; Marta Kędzior; Magdalena Bartnik-Głaska; Alicja Łuszczek; Krystyna Jakubów-Durska; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Beata Anna Nowakowska
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Plasma Cell-Free DNA Methylomics of Bipolar Disorder With and Without Rapid Cycling.

Authors:  Ada Man-Choi Ho; Stacey J Winham; Bryan M McCauley; Marija Kundakovic; Keith D Robertson; Zhifu Sun; Tamas Ordog; Lauren M Webb; Mark A Frye; Marin Veldic
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 5.152

7.  Clinical evaluation of non-invasive prenatal screening in 32,394 pregnancies from Changzhi maternal and child health care hospital of Shanxi China.

Authors:  XiaoZe Li; LiHong Wang; ZeRong Yao; FangYing Ruan; ZhiPeng Hu; WenXia Song
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 2.157

8.  Microfluidic Assay Measures Increased Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Circulating in Blood after Burn Injuries.

Authors:  Masayuki Otawara; Maedeh Roushan; Xiao Wang; Felix Ellett; Yong-Ming Yu; Daniel Irimia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Inherited unbalanced reciprocal translocation with 3q duplication and 5p deletion in a foetus revealed by cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) testing: a case report.

Authors:  Taccyanna M Ali; Emilia Mateu-Brull; Nuria Balaguer; Camila Dantas; Haline Risso Borges; Mariana Quintans Guerra de Oliveira; Lorena Rodrigo; Inmaculada Campos-Galindo; Roser Navarro; Miguel Milán
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.175

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.