Literature DB >> 26348180

Detection Rates for Aneuploidy by First-Trimester and Sequential Screening.

Rebecca J Baer1, Monica C Flessel, Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski, Sara Goldman, Louanne Hudgins, Andrew D Hull, Mary E Norton, Robert J Currier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate detection rates for aneuploidy by first-trimester and sequential screening.
METHODS: The study included women with singleton pregnancies who participated in the California Prenatal Screening Program with estimated delivery dates from August 2009 to December 2012 who had first- or first- and second-trimester (sequential) screening. Detection rates were measured for target (trisomies 21 and 18) and other aneuploidies identified from the California Chromosome Defect Registry.
RESULTS: Of 452,901 women screened, 17,435 (3.8%) were screen-positive for Down syndrome only; 433 (0.1%) for trisomy 18 only; 1,689 (0.4%) for both Down syndrome and trisomy 18; and 2,947 (0.7%) for neural tube defects, Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome, or for multiple conditions. The detection rates were Down syndrome-92.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91.4-94.2); trisomy 18-93.2% (95% CI 90.5-95.9); trisomy 13-80.4% (95% CI 73.9-86.9); 45,X-80.1% (95% CI 73.9-86.3), and triploidy-91.0% (95% CI 84.2-97.9). Overall, the detection rate for chromosome abnormalities was 81.6% (95% CI 80.0-83.1) at an overall false-positive rate of 4.5%.
CONCLUSION: First-trimester and sequential screening are sensitive and specific for the broad range of karyotype abnormalities seen in the population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26348180     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  10 in total

Review 1.  Cell-Free DNA Screening: Complexities and Challenges of Clinical Implementation.

Authors:  Matthew R Grace; Emily Hardisty; Sarah K Dotters-Katz; Neeta L Vora; Jeffrey A Kuller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.347

2.  Is preparation a good reason for prenatal genetic testing? Ethical and critical questions.

Authors:  Marsha Michie
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  The utility of nuchal translucency ultrasound in identifying rare chromosomal abnormalities not detectable by cell-free DNA screening.

Authors:  Victoria K Berger; Mary E Norton; Teresa N Sparks; Monica Flessel; Rebecca J Baer; Robert J Currier
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  The prediction of late-onset preeclampsia: Results from a longitudinal proteomics study.

Authors:  Offer Erez; Roberto Romero; Eli Maymon; Piya Chaemsaithong; Bogdan Done; Percy Pacora; Bogdan Panaitescu; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Sonia S Hassan; Adi L Tarca
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Factors associated with common and atypical chromosome abnormalities after positive combined first-trimester screening in Chinese women: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Annisa Mak; Helena Lee; C F Poon; S L Kwok; Teresa Ma; K Y K Chan; Anita Kan; Mary Tang; K Y Leung
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Noninvasive prenatal screening for patients with high body mass index: Evaluating the impact of a customized whole genome sequencing workflow on sensitivity and residual risk.

Authors:  Dale Muzzey; James D Goldberg; Carrie Haverty
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Maxilla-nasion-mandible (MNM) angle: an indicator to assess fetal facial profile in first-trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Suhui Qu; Mujun Wang; Wanju Xu; Guangying Zhang; Chengqi Zhang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-08-11

8.  Screening for chromosomal abnormalities using combined test in the first trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  Soo Yeon Park; In Ae Jang; Min Ah Lee; Young Ju Kim; Sun Hee Chun; Mi Hye Park
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2016-09-13

9.  Correlation of Maternal Stress Because of Positive Aneuploidy Screening Serum Analytes and Uterine Arteries' Doppler Ultrasound Index: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mahboobeh Shirazi; Parichehr Pooransari; Fatemeh Rahimi Sharbaf; S Hirin Niromanesh; Behrokh Sahebdel; Mamak Shariat; Zeinab Pahlavan; Mahmoud Shirazi; Maryam Ahmadian
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-10-02

10.  Triploidy and Routine Combined First Trimester Pregnancy Screening.

Authors:  Mitra Eftekhariyazdi; Ali Khaligh; Behnaz Suizi; Maryam Naghibi Nasab; Davood Zare-Abdollahi
Journal:  Avicenna J Med Biotechnol       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.