Literature DB >> 33722255

A placental trisomy 2 detected by NIPT evolved in a fetal small Supernumerary Marker Chromosome (sSMC).

Justyna Domaradzka1, Marta Deperas2, Ewa Obersztyn2, Anna Kucińska-Chahwan3, Nathalie Brison4, Kris Van Den Bogaert4, Tomasz Roszkowski3, Marta Kędzior2, Magdalena Bartnik-Głaska2, Alicja Łuszczek2, Krystyna Jakubów-Durska2, Joris Robert Vermeesch4, Beata Anna Nowakowska2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a rapidly developing and widely used method in the prenatal screening. Recently, the widespread use of the NIPT caused a neglecting of the limitations of this technology. CASE
PRESENTATION: The 38-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis because of a high risk of trisomy 2 revealed by the genome-wide Non-Invasive Prenatal Test (NIPT). The invasive prenatal diagnosis revealed the mosaicism for a small supernumerary marker chromosome sSMC derived from chromosome 2. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on uncultured amniocytes revealed three signals of centromere 2 in 30% of the cells. GTG-banded metaphases revealed abnormal karyotype (47,XX,+mar[21]/46,XX[19]) and was confirmed by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Cytogenetic analyses (FISH, aCGH, karyotype) on fetal skin biopsies were performed and confirmed the genomic gain of the centromeric region of chromosome 2. In the placenta, three cell lines were detected: a normal cell line, a cell line with trisomy 2 and a third one with only the sSMC.
CONCLUSION: Whole-genome Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing allows not only the identification of common fetal trisomies but also diagnosis of rare chromosomal abnormalities. Especially in such cases, it is extremely important to perform not only NIPT verification on a sample of material other than trophoblast, but also to apply appropriate research methods. Such conduct allows detailed analysis of the detected aberration, thus appropriate clinical validity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Array comparative genomic hybridization; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Karyotyping; Mosaicism; Non-invasive prenatal test; Small supernumerary marker chromosome

Year:  2021        PMID: 33722255      PMCID: PMC7962352          DOI: 10.1186/s13039-021-00535-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cytogenet        ISSN: 1755-8166            Impact factor:   2.009


  28 in total

Review 1.  Duplication of (2)(q11.1-q13.2) in a boy with mental retardation and cleft lip and palate: another clefting gene locus on proximal 2q?

Authors:  Mariluce Riegel; Albert Schinzel
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2002-07-22

2.  Free fetal DNA in maternal plasma in anembryonic pregnancies: confirmation that the origin is the trophoblast.

Authors:  M Alberry; D Maddocks; M Jones; M Abdel Hadi; S Abdel-Fattah; N Avent; P W Soothill
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 2 associated with abnormal maternal serum screening, oligohydramnios, intrauterine growth restriction, ventricular septal defect, preaxial polydactyly, and facial dysmorphism.

Authors:  Chih-Ping Chen; Yi-Yung Chen; Schu-Rern Chern; Peih-Shan Wu; Jun-Wei Su; Yu-Ting Chen; Chen-Chi Lee; Li-Feng Chen; Wayseen Wang
Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.705

4.  Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) of cystic fibrosis: an optimized protocol using MEMO fluorescent PCR to detect the p.Phe508del mutation.

Authors:  C Guissart; C Dubucs; C Raynal; A Girardet; F Tran Mau Them; V Debant; C Rouzier; A Boureau-Wirth; E Haquet; J Puechberty; E Bieth; D Dupin Deguine; P Khau Van Kien; M P Brechard; V Pritchard; M Koenig; M Claustres; M C Vincent
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Discrepancy between Non-invasive Prenatal Genetic Testing (NIPT) and Amniotic Chromosomal Test due to Placental Mosaicism: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Kei Hayata; Yuji Hiramatsu; Hisashi Masuyama; Eriko Eto; Takashi Mitsui; Shoko Tamada
Journal:  Acta Med Okayama       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 0.892

6.  Maternal liver transplant: Another cause of discordant fetal sex determination using cell-free DNA.

Authors:  Maria Neofytou; Nathalie Brison; Kris Van den Bogaert; Luc Dehaspe; Koen Devriendt; Anja Geerts; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Maternal mosaicism is a significant contributor to discordant sex chromosomal aneuploidies associated with noninvasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Yanlin Wang; Yan Chen; Feng Tian; Jianguang Zhang; Zhuo Song; Yi Wu; Xu Han; Wenjing Hu; Duan Ma; David Cram; Weiwei Cheng
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 8.  Noninvasive Prenatal Testing - When Is It Advantageous to Apply.

Authors:  Thomas Liehr; Angela Lauten; Uwe Schneider; Ekkehard Schleussner; Anja Weise
Journal:  Biomed Hub       Date:  2017-03-04

9.  Limited Clinical Utility of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Subchromosomal Abnormalities.

Authors:  Kitty K Lo; Evangelia Karampetsou; Christopher Boustred; Fiona McKay; Sarah Mason; Melissa Hill; Vincent Plagnol; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Reliable detection of subchromosomal deletions and duplications using cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Liesbeth Vossaert; Qun Wang; Roseen Salman; Xinming Zhuo; Chunjing Qu; David Henke; Ron Seubert; Jennifer Chow; Lance U'ren; Brennan Enright; Jackie Stilwell; Eric Kaldjian; Yaping Yang; Chad Shaw; Brynn Levy; Ronald Wapner; Amy Breman; Ignatia Van den Veyver; Arthur Beaudet
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.050

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.