Literature DB >> 25957020

Cell free DNA testing-interpretation of results using an online calculator.

Matthew R Grace1, Emily Hardisty1, Noah S Green1, Emily Davidson1, Alison M Stuebe1, Neeta L Vora2.   

Abstract

All pregnant women, regardless of age, should be offered screening or invasive testing for chromosomal abnormalities at <20 weeks' gestation. Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy with the use of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a screening method that offers high sensitivity and specificity in validation studies and has reduced the need for unnecessary invasive procedures. Laboratories often advertise and report a test's sensitivity and specificity as a means to describe the test's accuracy. The positive predictive value (PPV) of a screening test (the proportion of positive results that are truly positive) is a function of the prevalence of the condition in a population and often is not reported in direct-to-patient advertising. False-positive cfDNA screening tests have been reported, and there is evidence that some women are deciding to terminate their pregnancy without confirmatory testing. We believe that laboratories should disclose the patient-specific PPV of cfDNA screening for aneuploidy on result reports. To assist with counseling patients about the benefits, risks, and limitations of aneuploidy screening with the use of cfDNA and to demonstrate the relationship between an a priori risk and PPV, we developed a web-based calculator to estimate the PPV of the 4 commercially available cfDNA testing platforms for which data have been published. Estimates are made with the use of a patient's age and gestational age-related risk of trisomy 21, 18 and 13 or an a priori risk that is based on other findings. This web-based calculator is an aid for providers and genetic counselors to illustrate the relationship between disease prevalence and a test's PPV. It has enhanced our counseling of patients both before they elect noninvasive prenatal screening and after they receive a positive result.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aneuploidy; cfDNA; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25957020     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  3 in total

Review 1.  Pre- and post-test genetic counseling for chromosomal and Mendelian disorders.

Authors:  Jill Fonda Allen; Katie Stoll; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 2.  Cell-Free DNA Screening: Complexities and Challenges of Clinical Implementation.

Authors:  Matthew R Grace; Emily Hardisty; Sarah K Dotters-Katz; Neeta L Vora; Jeffrey A Kuller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.347

3.  NIPTRIC: an online tool for clinical interpretation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results.

Authors:  Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz; Lennart F Johansson; Eddy N de Boer; Elles M J Boon; Ron F Suijkerbuijk; Katelijne Bouman; Catia M Bilardo; Morris A Swertz; Martijn Dijkstra; Irene M van Langen; Richard J Sinke; Gerard J Te Meerman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.