Literature DB >> 27525035

Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure.

Katherine A DeLong1, Melissa Troyer1, Marta Kutas2.   

Abstract

For more than a decade, views of sentence comprehension have been shifting toward wider acceptance of a role for linguistic pre-processing-that is, anticipation, expectancy, (neural) pre-activation, or prediction-of upcoming semantic content and syntactic structure. In this survey, we begin by examining the implications of each of these "brands" of predictive comprehension, including the issue of potential costs and consequences to not encountering highly constrained sentence input. We then describe a number of studies (many using online methodologies) that provide results consistent with prospective sensitivity to various grains and levels of semantic and syntactic information, acknowledging that such pre-processing is likely to occur in other linguistic and extralinguistic domains, as well. This review of anticipatory findings also includes some discussion on the relationship of priming to prediction. We conclude with a brief examination of some possible limits to prediction, and with a suggestion for future work to probe whether and how various strands of prediction may integrate during real-time comprehension.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 27525035      PMCID: PMC4982702          DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass        ISSN: 1749-818X


  46 in total

Review 1.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components.

Authors:  Cyma Van Petten; Barbara J Luka
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier; Marta Kutas; Rina Schul
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Early occipital sensitivity to syntactic category is based on form typicality.

Authors:  Suzanne Dikker; Hugh Rabagliati; Thomas A Farmer; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-04-13

4.  To predict or not to predict: age-related differences in the use of sentential context.

Authors:  Edward W Wlotko; Kara D Federmeier; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-07-09

5.  Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake--but only for skilled producers.

Authors:  Nivedita Mani; Falk Huettig
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times.

Authors:  Jos J A Van Berkum; Colin M Brown; Pienie Zwitserlood; Valesca Kooijman; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-10       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-07-30

9.  Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies.

Authors:  W Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-08-24       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  So that's what you meant! Event-related potentials reveal multiple aspects of context use during construction of message-level meaning.

Authors:  Edward W Wlotko; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  27 in total

1.  Looking for a Location: Dissociated Effects of Event-Related Plausibility and Verb-Argument Information on Predictive Processing in Aphasia.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hayes; Michael Walsh Dickey; Tessa Warren
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Lumos!: Electrophysiological tracking of (wizarding) world knowledge use during reading.

Authors:  Melissa Troyer; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  To catch a Snitch: Brain potentials reveal variability in the functional organization of (fictional) world knowledge during reading.

Authors:  Melissa Troyer; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Verbal and Nonverbal Anticipatory Mechanisms in Bilinguals.

Authors:  Lorenzo Desideri; Paola Bonifacci
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-06

5.  Maternal Socioeconomic Status Influences the Range of Expectations During Language Comprehension in Adulthood.

Authors:  Melissa Troyer; Arielle Borovsky
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-03-13

6.  Similar time courses for word form and meaning preactivation during sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Wen-Hsuan Chan; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Hemispheric differences and similarities in comprehending more and less predictable sentences.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Semantic and plausibility preview benefit effects in English: Evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Annie Jia
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Out of the corner of my eye: Foveal semantic load modulates parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Mallory C Stites; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The amount and structure of prior event experience affects anticipatory sentence interpretation.

Authors:  Arielle Borovsky
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.