| Literature DB >> 27508340 |
Galia Gat-Yablonski1,2,3, Andrija Finka4,5, Galit Pinto3, Manfredo Quadroni6, Biana Shtaif2,3, Pierre Goloubinoff4.
Abstract
Studies in young mammals on the molecular effects of food restriction leading to prolong adult life are scares. Here, we used high-throughput quantitative proteomic analysis of whole rat livers to address the molecular basis for growth arrest and the apparent life-prolonging phenotype of the food restriction regimen. Over 1800 common proteins were significantly quantified in livers of ad libitum, restriction- and re-fed rats, which summed up into 92% of the total protein mass of the cells. Compared to restriction, ad libitum cells contained significantly less mitochondrial catabolic enzymes and more cytosolic and ER HSP90 and HSP70 chaperones, which are hallmarks of heat- and chemically-stressed tissues. Following re-feeding, levels of HSPs nearly reached ad libitum levels. The quantitative and qualitative protein values indicated that the restriction regimen was a least stressful condition that used minimal amounts of HSP-chaperones to maintain optimal protein homeostasis and sustain optimal life span. In contrast, the elevated levels of HSP-chaperones in ad libitum tissues were characteristic of a chronic stress, which in the long term could lead to early aging and shorter life span.Entities:
Keywords: aging; catch up growth; food restriction; heat shock proteins; mitochondria
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27508340 PMCID: PMC5032693 DOI: 10.18632/aging.101009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Body weight, liver weight and crude liver fat content
| Sample | Body weight (Baseline) (g) | Body weight (Termination) (g) | Liver weight (BC) (g) | Liver weight (Termination)(g) | Fat (mg/100 mg Liver) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 57.5±7.8a | 127.6±12.3 a | 2.45±0.18 | 6.2±1.1 a | 6.3±1.8 a |
| RES | 60.7±9.1 a | 69.3±3.9 b | 2.75±0.45 b | 6.3±0.6 a | |
| CU | 54.9±9.3 a | 86.58±5.8 c | 4.6±0.3 c | 7.1±1.5 a |
Comparisons were done within each column. Superscripts marked with the same letter do not differ significantly at P<0.05.
Figure 1Relative mass fraction values of significantly quantified proteins from rat livers
(A) Venn diagram: numbers (in brackets) of significantly quantified proteins, separately in AL-, RE- and CU livers. The sum of masses of the 1826 significantly quantified proteins in all three treatments was 92% of the total mass. (B) The sum of the relative mass fractions of the 2551 significantly quantified proteins in AL livers, before (left) or after (right) their correction by subtracting the most abundant blood proteins, Hemoglobin (Hba, Hbb), carbonic anhydrase (Ca3) and serum albumin (Alb) and expressing them as net liver cell values. (C) Correlation between the total relative masses of the 21 most abundant gene ontology (GO) categories that contain more than 2% of the total protein mass in AL rat liver cells, as compared to published human HepG2 cancer cells (see Supplementary Table 2). (D) Correlation between the total relative masses of core chaperones (red) and ribosomal proteins (yellow) in AL rat liver cells, as compared to HepG2 cells. (E) Sum of relative mass proportions (%) of the large and small ribosomal proteins in AL rat liver cells (left), as compared to HepG2 cells (right). (F) Sum of relative masses (%) in AL rat liver and HepG2 cells of all CCT chaperonins (grey). (G) Relative mass distribution among the eight homologous subunits CCT1-8 (each differentially colored) in the hetero-hexadecameric chaperonin complex (right).
Figure 2Net significant differences in protein masses between RES and AL
(A) Sum of relative mass gains and losses in RES compared to AL. Right: Only the proteins with significant (P<0.05) mass differences Left: All detected proteins. (B) Relative (left) and absolute (right) mass losses of the 40 most depleted proteins in RES compared to AL. (C) Relative (left) and absolute (right) mass gains of the 40 most accumulated proteins in RES compared to AL. Grey, mitochondrial proteins. Red: chaperome proteins. Yellow: ribosomal proteins. White: others.
Figure 3Net changes in protein masses between CU and RES
(A) Sum of relative mass gains and losses in CU as compared to RES. Left: only proteins with significant (P<0.05) mass differences. Right: All detected proteins. (B) Net absolute mass losses of the 40 most depleted proteins in CU. (C) Net absolute mass gains of the 40 most accumulated proteins in CU. Grey, mitochondrial proteins. Red: chaperome proteins. Yellow: ribosomal proteins. White: others.
Figure 4Differences in protein masses between RES, AL and CU regimes
(A) Venn diagram showing the 617 proteins, whose mass was significantly different between RES and AL (left) and the 513 proteins whose mass became significantly changed during one day of RES to CU transition (right). 193 proteins (center) varied significantly in both comparisons. (B) Proteins whose mass proportions were significantly higher in RES than in AL and CU. (C) Proteins whose mass proportions were significantly lower in RES than in AL and CU. Grey, mitochondrial proteins. Red: chaperone proteins. Yellow: ribosomal proteins. White: others.
Measured cellular concentrations of key metabolic enzymes, components of the cellular proteostasis machineries, proteins involved in growth regulation, glycogen synthesis and lipid catabolism
| Protein names | copy number (AL) | copy number (RES) | copy number (AL-RES) | T-test (AL-RES)* | copy number (CU) | copy number (CU-RES) | T-test (CU-RES) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cps1, Carbamoyl-phosphate synthase (M) | 44125 | 70441 | −26316 | 0.001 | 60291 | −10150 | 0.087 |
| Etfb, Electron transfer flavoprotein subunit beta (M) | 9357 | 12041 | −2684 | 0.015 | 11318 | −723 | 0.433 |
| Hsd17b10, 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase type-2 (M) | 7431 | 11123 | −3692 | 0.001 | 7808 | −3315 | 0.057 |
| Mdh2, Malate dehydrogenase (M) | 8402 | 10195 | −1793 | 0.048 | 10160 | −34 | 0.984 |
| Echs1, Enoyl-CoA hydratase (M) | 4593 | 6930 | −2337 | 0.006 | 5301 | −1629 | 0.042 |
| HSPA5, 78 kDa glucose-regulated protein, GRP78, BiP, (ER) | 8050 | 5968 | 2082 | 0.013 | 7240 | 1272 | 0.045 |
| St2a2, Alcohol sulfotransferase A (C) | 2661 | 5046 | −2385 | 0.006 | 4903 | −143 | 0.888 |
| Aldh1a1, Retinal dehydrogenase 1 (C) | 3273 | 4629 | −1356 | 0.028 | 4470 | −159 | 0.826 |
| Got1, Aspartate aminotransferase, (C) | 3190 | 4298 | −1108 | 0.036 | 5063 | 765 | 0.199 |
| HSPA8, Heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein (C) | 5261 | 4270 | 991 | 0.008 | 6381 | 2111 | 0.003 |
| Hadha, Trifunctional enzyme subunit alpha (M) | 3294 | 3920 | −625 | 0.033 | 3412 | −507 | 0.296 |
| Eci1, Enoyl-CoA delta isomerase 1 (M) | 2002 | 3816 | −1814 | 0 | 3431 | −385 | 0.241 |
| Idh2, Isocitrate dehydrogenase (M) | 2772 | 3741 | −969 | 0.006 | 3102 | −639 | 0.039 |
| Gnmt, Glycine N-methyltransferase (C) | 2178 | 3355 | −1177 | 0.013 | 2893 | −462 | 0.199 |
| HSP90b1, Endoplasmin, GRP94 (ER) | 4518 | 3180 | 1338 | 0.002 | 4079 | 899 | 0.029 |
| Hibadh, 3-hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase (M) | 1836 | 2957 | −1121 | 0.003 | 2399 | −558 | 0.034 |
| Ugt1a1, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1 (ER) | 1652 | 2547 | −895 | 0.056 | 1830 | −717 | 0.121 |
| Dmgdh, Dimethylglycine dehydrogenase (M) | 1784 | 2498 | −715 | 0.028 | 1965 | −533 | 0.078 |
| Gcdh, Glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase (M) | 1547 | 2479 | −932 | 0.002 | 1913 | −566 | 0.131 |
| Suclg2, Succinyl-CoA ligase subunit beta (M) | 1404 | 1971 | −567 | 0.003 | 1622 | −349 | 0.049 |
| Slc25a20, Carnitine/acylcarnitine carrier protein (M) * | 1642 | 1934 | −291 | 0.391 | 1613 | −321 | 0.218 |
| Sardh, Sarcosine dehydrogenase (M) | 1111 | 1537 | −426 | 0.04 | 1380 | −157 | 0.442 |
| Cpt2, Carnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2 (M) | 1044 | 1480 | −436 | 0.006 | 1235 | −245 | 0.144 |
| Pygl, Glycogen phosphorylase, liver form (C)* | 1500 | 1333 | 168 | 0.394 | 1457 | 124 | 0.568 |
| Dhtkd1, 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase E1 (M) | 1013 | 1328 | −315 | 0.02 | 1098 | −230 | 0.175 |
| Aco2, Aconitate hydratase (M) | 944 | 1325 | −380 | 0.009 | 1286 | −38 | 0.796 |
| Pdhb, Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit beta (M)* | 934 | 1084 | −150 | 0.102 | 1039 | −44 | 0.723 |
| Acadsb, Short/branched chain specific acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (M) | 679 | 1002 | −323 | 0.001 | 672 | −330 | 0.001 |
| Pdha1, Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit alpha (M)* | 681 | 779 | −98 | 0.162 | 713 | −66 | 0.281 |
| Psma1-7 ; Psmb1-7, Proteasome 20S subunit (C)* | 595 | 557 | 38 | 0.582 | 584 | 27 | 0.706 |
| Alt1, Alanine aminotransferase (C) | 134 | 546 | −412 | 0.005 | 571 | 25 | 0.868 |
| Sec13, Protein SEC13 homolog (C, ER, N) | 491 | 321 | 171 | 0.009 | 404 | 83 | 0.118 |
| Gys2, Glycogen [starch] synthase, liver (C) | 69 | 147 | −78 | 0.043 | 74 | −74 | 0.056 |
| Pdk2, Pyruvate dehydrogenase (acetyl-transferring)] kinase isozyme 2 (M) | 63 | 114 | −50 | 0.034 | 47 | −67 | 0.011 |
| Pcna, Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (N) | 127 | 70 | 57 | 0.046 | 152 | 82 | 0.008 |
| Atg3, Ubiquitin-like-conjugating enzyme ATG3 (C) | 94 | 63 | 31 | 0.004 | 83 | 20 | 0.295 |
| Srp54, Signal recognition particle 54 kDa protein (C) | 44 | 32 | 12 | 0.02 | 40 | 9 | 0.054 |
| Stat5b, Signal transducer and activator of transcription 5B (C,N) | 27 | 15 | 11 | 0.01 | 21 | 6 | 0.083 |
| Pdk4, [Pyruvate dehydrogenase (acetyl-transferring)] kinase isozyme 4 (M)* | 1 | 9 | −8 | 0.098 | 1 | −9 | 0.071 |
| Igfbp1, Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 (S) | 1 | 6 | −5 | 0.005 | 0 | −6 | 0.002 |
| Atg7, Ubiquitin-like modifier-activating enzyme ATG7 (C)* | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0.745 | 3 | 1 | 0.221 |
| Igfals, Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein complex acid labile subunit (S) | 12 | 3 | 10 | 0.014 | 9 | 6 | 0.168 |
| Igf1, Insulin-like growth factor I (S) | 55 | 2 | 53 | 0.015 | 9 | 7 | 0.094 |
| Cdk9, Cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (N) * | 1 | 2 | −1 | 0.294 | 0 | −2 | 0.222 |
| Nr3c1, Glucocorticoid receptor (C,M,N)* | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.395 | 2 | 1 | 0.479 |
| Becn1, Beclin-1 (ER, G, M) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.081 | 1 | 1 | 0.146 |
| Sqstm1, Sequestosome-1 | 4 | 2 | −2 | 0.500 | 31 | 28 | 0.500 |
| Atg2a, Autophagy-related protein 2 homolog A (C) * | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.313 | 1 | 1 | 0.280 |
Quantities of individual proteins mentioned in text expressed in copy numbers of polypeptide per micron cube of liver cell. Red: Chaperone proteins. Proteins with asterisks have a non-significant variation between RES and AL. Presumed cellular localization: C-cytosol, ER-endoplasmic reticulum, G-Golgi, M-mitochondrion, N-nucleus, S-secreted