| Literature DB >> 28718808 |
Meytal Bar-Maisels1,2, Yankel Gabet3, Raanan Shamir4,5,6, Sahar Hiram-Bab7, Metsada Pasmanik-Chor8, Moshe Phillip9,10,11, Fabiana Bar-Yoseph12, Galia Gat-Yablonski13,14,15.
Abstract
Palmitic acid (PA) is the most abundant saturated fatty acid in human milk, where it is heavily concentrated in the sn-2-position (termed beta palmitate, BPA) and as such is conserved in all women, regardless of their diet or ethnicity, indicating its physiological and metabolic importance. We hypothesized that BPA improves the efficiency of nutrition-induced catch up growth as compared to sn-1,3 PA, which is present in vegetable oil. Pre-pubertal male rats were subjected to a 17 days food restriction followed by re-feeding for nine days with 1,3 PA or BPA-containing diets. We measured bone length, epiphyseal growth plate height (EGP, histology), bone quality (micro-CT and 3-point bending assay), and gene expression (Affymetrix). The BPA-containing diet improved most growth parameters: humeri length and EGP height were greater in the BPA-fed animals. Further analysis of the EGP revealed that the hypertrophic zone was significantly higher in the BPA group. In addition, Affymetrix analysis revealed that the diet affected the expression of several genes in the liver and EGP. Despite the very subtle difference between the diets and the short re-feeding period, we found a small but significant improvement in most growth parameters in the BPA-fed rats. This pre-clinical study may have important implications, especially for children with growth disorders and children with special nutritional needs.Entities:
Keywords: beta palmitate; biomechanics; catch-up growth; growth plate; linear growth; μCT
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28718808 PMCID: PMC5537878 DOI: 10.3390/nu9070764
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Effect of the diets on growth parameters.
| Growth Parameters | Control 1,3 Diet (CD) ( | Infat Oil (BPA) Diet (IO) ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (g) | 131.3 ± 7.9 | 135.6 ± 8.4 | 0.31 |
| Weight gain (g) | 83.5 ± 5.1 | 87.9 ± 6.4 | 0.17 |
| Liver weight (g) | 6.9 ± 0.3 | 6.8 ± 0.5 | 0.81 |
| Liver fat content (mg/100 mg tissue) | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.7 | 0.64 |
| Full humerus length (mm) | 19.86 ± 0.5 | 20.4 ± 0.3 | 0.042 |
| EGP height (mm) | 0.39 ± 0.02 | 0.41 ± 0.02 | 0.06 |
| Proliferative (mm) | 0.22 ± 0.04 | 0.21 ± 0.03 | 0.44 |
| Hypertrophic (mm) | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.2 ± 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Proliferative/hypertrophic | 1.21 ± 0.18 | 1.03 ± 0.14 | 0.05 |
| IGF-I (ng/mL) | 868.1 ± 193.7 | 894.2 ± 108.1 | 0.78 |
| Leptin (pg/mL) | 1461 ± 196 | 1448 ± 434.8 | 0.94 |
Figure 1Representative stained sections of the epiphyseal growth plate (EGP) of Sprague Dawley rats, 49 days old. Hematoxylin and eosin and Alcian blue staining shows the margins of the cartilaginous EGP. (A,C) Control Diet; (B,D) Infat Oil diet. (A,B) show a magnification X4, scale bar = 200 μm; (C,D) show a magnification X10, scale bar = 100 μm; six sections were measured in each group.
Effect of the diets on bone parameter values by µCT and 3-point bending assay.
| Bone Parameters | Control 1,3 Diet (CD) ( | Infat Oil (BPA) Diet (IO) ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) (mg HA/cm3g) | 296.7 ± 14.85 | 306.58 ± 15.2 | 0.262 |
| (A) Cortical bone parameters | |||
| Tt.Ar (mm2) | 3.15 ± 0.07 | 3.07 ± 0.11 | 0.51 |
| Ct.Ar (mm2) | 1.75 ± 0.1 | 1.83 ± 0.12 | 0.31 |
| Ct.Ar/Tt.Ar (%) | 55 ± 0.02 | 59 ± 0.04 | 0.058 |
| Ct.Th (mm) | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 0.35 ± 0.03 | 0.026 |
| (B) Trabecular bone parameters (tROI) | |||
| BV/TV (%) | 3.9 ± 1.31 | 5.26 ± 2.02 | 0.17 |
| Tb.Th (mm) | 0.05 ± 0.004 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.11 |
| Tb.N (mm-1) | 1.06 ± 0.15 | 1.19 ± 0.26 | 0.28 |
| Tb.Sp (mm) | 0.96 ± 0.14 | 0.89 ± 0.15 | 0.41 |
| (B1) Proximal ROI (proximal metaphysis) | |||
| BV/TV (%) | 5.7 ± 2 | 7.5 ± 3 | 0.22 |
| Tb.Th (mm) | 0.05 ± 0.004 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.11 |
| Tb.N (mm−1) | 1.46 a ± 0.2 | 1.54 ± 0.29 | 0.55 |
| Tb.Sp (mm) | 0.71 ± 0.09 | 0.69 ± 0.11 | 0.73 |
| (B2) Distal ROI (proximal metaphysis) | |||
| BV/TV (%) | 0.72 ± 0.15 | 1.25 ± 0.5 | 0.015 |
| Tb.Th (mm) | 0.05 ± 0.0 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.98 |
| Tb.N (mm−1) | 0.71 ± 0.1 | 0.84 ± 0.21 | 0.154 |
| Tb.Sp (mm) | 1.42 ± 0.21 | 1.25 ± 0.23 | 0.21 |
| (C) Bone biomechanical properties | |||
| Stiffness (N/mm) | 41.68 ± 14.4 | 36.37 ± 7.6 | 0.43 |
| Maximal load (N) | 22.8 ± 4.3 | 21.54 ± 3.5 | 0.53 |
| Energy to maximum (N*mm) | 14.02 ± 3.5 | 16.5 ± 5.0 | 0.3 |
Superscripts denote significant between-group differences as follows (p < 0.05); cortical thickness and the bone volume fraction (BV/TV) of the distal bone were significantly different. vBMD, full volumetric bone mineral density; Tt.Ar, total area; Ct.Ar, cortical area; Ct.Th, cortical thickness; BV/TV, bone volume fraction; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.N, trabecular number, Tb.Sp, trabecular separation.
Figure 2Three-dimensional cortical (left) and trabecular (right) bone images obtained by µCT. (A,B,E,F) Control Diet; (C,D,G,H) Infat Oil diet (Two representative figures are presented per each group). The calculations were done on the cortical ring only, without the trabeculae.
Top 20 genes in the EGP significantly affected by the position of palmitic acid in the diet (all data are significant at p < 0.05 (ANOVA).
| Gene Symbol | Gene Name | Gene ID | Fold Change (IO/CD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mt2A | Metallothionein 2A | NM_001137564 | 1.56 |
| Rbp4 | Retinol binding protein 4 | NM_013162 | 1.5 |
| Calcr | Calcitonin receptor | NM_001034015 | 1.42 |
| Reln | Reelin | NM_080394 | 1.37 |
| Clu | Clusterin | NM_053021 | 1.36 |
| Sh2b2 | SH2B adaptor protein 2 | NM_053669 | 1.35 |
| Ngf | Nerve growth factor (beta polypeptide) | NM_001277055 | 1.35 |
| Pdcd4 | Programmed cell death 4 | NM_022265 | 1.34 |
| Cyp4a3 | Cytochrome P450, family 4, subfamily a, polypeptide 3 | NM_175760 | 1.3 |
| Gdf5 | Growth differentiation factor 5 | ENSRNOT00000073736 | 1.28 |
| Zbtb16 | Zinc finger and DTD domain containing 16 | NM_001013181 | 1.28 |
| Actb | Actin, beta | ENSRNOT00000034844 | −1.26 |
| Socs3 | Suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 | NM_053565 | −1.26 |
| Arl4a | ADP-ribosylation factor like GTPase 4A | NM_019186 | −1.26 |
| Mir212 | microRNA 212 | NR_031925 | −1.27 |
| RGD1309821 | Similar to KIAA1161 protein | NSRNOT00000033235 | −1.34 |
| Rpl18 | Ribosomal protein L18 | FQ229993 | −1.35 |
| Postn | Periostin, osteoblast specific factor | NM_001108550 | −1.43 |
| Tnn | Tenascin N | NM_001107189 | −1.56 |
| Aspn | Asporin | NM_001014008 | −1.72 |
Figure 3Differential gene expression in the EGP according to Rat Affymetrix Gene Chip expression array (Rat Gene 2.X ST, Affymetrix, Thermo Scientific) (n = 4 per each group). Heatmap of the genes that were differentially expressed in EGP in the Infat Oil (IO) versus the Control Diet (CD) fed animals (p < 0.05 and FC = 1.5). The heatmap was created using Partek GS.