Literature DB >> 27494616

The Emergence of Quinolone Resistant Shigella sonnei, Pondicherry, India.

Ankita Das1, Mailan Natarajan1, Jharna Mandal1.   

Abstract

Ciprofloxacin resistant Shigella sonnei across the globe have been increasing alarmingly. In order to understand the emergence of S.sonnei with respect to ciprofloxacin resistance in our patient population, the following study was carried out. Of the 184 Shigella sp. Isolated from 2012 to 2015, 34 S.sonnei which were confirmed by standard methods and subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing were selected. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 16/34 quinolone resistant isolates tested ranged from 4micrograms/ml to 16micrograms/ml for ciprofloxacin, from 16 micrograms/ml to 64 micrograms/ml for ofloxacin and from 16micrograms/ml to 64micrograms/ml for levofloxacin. Sequence determination of the quinolone resistance determining regions of gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE genes showed mutations in GyrA at Gln69/Trp, Phe71/Ser, Ser72/Pro, Met75/Leu, Ser90/Cys, Met94/Leu, His106/Pro, Asn161/His, Thr163/Ala and in ParC at Ala64/Asp. Among the plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQRs) targets investigated,qnrB was the most (93.7%) prevalent followed by qnrC (18.7%). None hadqnrA, qnrS and qepA. Two (0.1%) of the isolates harboured theaac(6')-lb gene. Drug accumulation assay detected the presence of efflux pump activity in 9/15 (60%) among ciprofloxacin resistant isolates. All isolates harboured the ipaH gene followed by ial (17.6%), sen (11.7%), set1A&set1B (5.8%) genes. None had stx1 element. PCR for Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) sequences resulted in 4 unique clusters, of which Type III was the most (44%) dominant but there was no correlation between the ERIC types and the antibiotic resistance pattern or the virulence profile. A documented increase in S.sonnei harbouring the qnrgenes and some unusual genes like set1Aand indicate an ongoing process of horizontal gene transfer. The accumulation of novel mutations in GyrA and ParC in the presence of efflux pump and PMQR genes contributed to the raised MIC to quinolones. These findings are crucial in our understanding of quinolone resistance in these isolates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27494616      PMCID: PMC4975386          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Shigellosis is very contagious and can spread through communities at a fast rate posing a health threat globally. The low infective dose and the transmissibility of this agent through fingers, flies, fomites, food and faecal contamination of drinking water allows this organism to cause outbreaks very easily [1]. Shigellosis can be caused by any of the known serogroups of Shigella. But the relative frequency of the isolation of the most common serogroup differs geographically, the most common being Shigella flexneri in the developing nations. Though S.sonnei has been attributed to cause disease mostly in developed countries the current scenario speaks otherwise as it is marked by spread of this agent due to travel to endemic places. Several reports from the Indian subcontinent and south-east Asian countries have revealed a changing scenario regarding the shift in serogroups of Shigella. All in common have highlighted the growing importance of S.sonnei emerging as a close competitor of S.flexneri in its dominance [2,3,4]. Ciprofloxacin has been an empirical therapy for shigellosis across the globe for a very long time. Resistance to quinolones is mediated by mutations in the chromosomal genes called the quinolone resistance determining regions (QRDRs) of DNA gyrases namely, gyrA and gyrB and the Type IV topoisomerases namely, parC and parE or the presence of plasmid genes called the plasmid mediated quinolone resistance regions (PMQRs) namely the qnr (qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD, qnrS, qep, aac(6’)lb-cr) genes. Drug efflux pumps like mdfA,tolC,ydhE,marA. confer quinolone resistance. Any change in the outer membrane leading to porin loss can also result in increase in MIC to quinolones. The emergence of ciprofloxacin resistance has been reported since 2002 with the clonal spread of a ciprofloxacin resistant S.dysenteriae serotype 1 from Kolkata to other places followed by S.flexneri 2a and S.flexneri 3a in 2004 and finally in S.sonnei in 2007[2]. There are increasing reports regarding ciprofloxacin resistant Shigella across the globe which can be attributed to increased frequency in international travels, low infective dose and ease of accepting antibiotic resistance genes by horizontal gene transmission [5]. The following study was carried out to understand the emergence of S.sonnei with respect to ciprofloxacin resistance in our patient population.

Materials and Method

The study was reviewed and approved by the Institute Ethics Committee (Human studies) at Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry (Approval No. JIP/IEC/2014/5/324). Since, the samples are collected for routine diagnostics, our hospital does not have a policy for taking informed consent for collecting stool samples from patients. The ethics committee approval was obtained to store and study the microbial isolates obtained from these samples. S.sonnei isolated from stool samples at Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, India between years 2012 to 2015 were selected for this study. The isolates were obtained from stool samples of diarrhoea and dysentery cases and confirmed by standard biochemical tests [6] followed by serotyping by slide agglutination using specific antisera (Denka-Seiken, Tokyo, Japan). Antibacterial susceptibility and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the isolates was determined in accordance with the Clinical laboratory standards institute (CLSI) guidelines[7] by the Kirby Bauer method and the MICs of quinolones was performed using the E-test(Biomerieux, Etoile, France). The quinolones tested included ciprofloxacin (Cf), ofloxacin (Of) and levofloxacin (Le). ATCC Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was included as control in each test. Total DNA was extracted from the isolates using the boiling lysis method[8]. Briefly, a single colony from overnight culture was suspended in 100microlitre sterile molecular grade water. This preparation was boiled at 100degC for 30minutes followed by flash cooling on ice for 5 minutes. The preparation was then centrifuged at 10000g for 5 minutes and supernatant transferred to a fresh tube and stored at -20degreesC. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based detection of virulence genes (ipaH, sen, set1A, set1B, ial, and stx1) among the isolated Shigella spp. was performed using published primers [9,10,11] as described in Table 1. The QRDRs of gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE genes were amplified using published primers (Table 1) as described earlier [12]. PCR was performed to amplify PMQR targets for the presence of four major groups of qnr determinants, qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrS and two additional PMQR genes, qepA and aac(6′)-Ib-cr, using published primers [13] as described in Table 1. All primers used in this study were obtained from Bioserve India biotechnologies India private limited, India.
Table 1

Primers used in this study.

GENESEQUENCE (5’→3’)REFERENCE
gyrAFORWARDTACACCGGTCAACATTGAGG12
REVERSETTAATGATTGCCGCCGTCGG12
gyrBFORWARDTGAAATGACCCGCCGTAAAGG12
REVERSEGCTGTGATAACGCAGTTTGTCCGGG12
parCFORWARDGTCTGAACTGGGCCTGAATGC12
REVERSEAGCAGCTCGGAATATTTCGACAA12
parEFORWARDATGCGTGCGGCTAAAAAAGTG12
REVERSETCGTCGCTGTCAGGATCGATAC12
qnrAFORWARDATTTCTCACGCCAGGATTTG13
REVERSEGATCGGCAAAGGTTAGGTCA13
qnrBFORWARDGATCGTGAAAGCCAGAAAGG13
REVERSEATGAGCAACGATGCCTGGTA13
qnrCFORWARDGGGTTGTACATTTATTGAATCG13
REVERSECACCTACCCATTTATTTTCA13
qnrSFORWARDGCAAGTTCATTGAACAGGGT13
REVERSETCTAAACCGTCGAGTTCGGCG13
aac(6′)-Ib-crFORWARDTTGCGATGCTCTATGAGTGGCTA13
REVERSECTCGAATGCCTGGCGTGTTT13
qepAFORWARDAACTGCTTGAGCCCGTAGAT13
REVERSEGTCTACGCCATGGACCTCAC13
ERICFORWARDATGTAAGCTCCTGGGGATTCAC15
REVERSEAAGTAAGTGACTGGGGTGAGCG15
ipaHFORWARDTGGAAAAACTCAGTGCCTCT9
REVERSECCAGTCCGTAAATTCATTCT9
senFORWARDATGTGCCTGCTATTATTTAT11
REVERSECATAATAATAAGCGGTCGC11
ialFORWARDCTGGATGGTATGGTGAGG11
REVERSEGGAGGCCAACAATTATTTCC11
stx1FORWARDCTGGATTTAATGTCGCATAGTG10
REVERSEAGAACGCCCACTGAGATCATC10
set1AFORWARDTCACGCTACCATCAAAGA11
REVERSETATCCCCCTTTGGTGGTA11
set1BFORWARDGTGAACCTGCTGCCGATATC11
REVERSEATTTGTGGATAAAAATGACG11
PCR amplified products were then subjected to sequencing using an ABI 3700 sequencer (Applied Biosystem, Foster, CA, USA) at Bioserve India biotechnologies India private limited, India. Contig sequences generated were assembled and compared using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) of the NCBI. Drug accumulation assay was performed as described earlier [14]. Briefly, ciprofloxacin sensitive and resistant isolates of Shigella were grown in LB and harvested. The MIC of ciprofloxacin was determined on Mueller Hinton agar with and without Carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) at a concentration of 20 mg/L using the Etest (Biomerieux, Etoile, France). A reduction in the MIC by 2–4 fold indicated the presence of an efflux pump activity. ERIC PCR was performed according to Ranjbar et al [15] with some minor modifications viz. the gel electrophoresis was performed at 80 V for 1 hour instead of 4 hours. The ERIC-PCR profiles were normalized and analysed by PyElph (which is an open source Python based software for gel images analysis).

Results

Of the 184 Shigella sp. isolated S.flexneri was the maximum (95/184 = 51.7%), followed by S.sonnei(34/184 = 20.6%),S.dysenteriae(7/184 = 3.7%),S.boydii(6/184 = 3.1%)and non-typable Shigella(42/184 = 22.2%). The year wise number of isolates are as mentioned in Table 2.
Table 2

Isolation of different serogroups during the period of study (2012–2015).

YearS.dysenteriaeS.flexneriS.boydiiS.sonnei*NTShigellaTotal
2012021(55.26)1(2.63)5(1.31)11(28.94)38
20133(7.31)20(48.78)1(2.43)11(26.8)6(14.63)41
20141(1.88)24(45.28)1(1.88)13(24.52)14(26.41)53
20153(5.76)30(57.69)3(5.76)5(9.61)11(21.15)52
Total7(3.80)95(51.63)6(3.26)34(18.47)42(22.82)184

* NT: non-typable

* NT: non-typable Of the 34 isolates in our study, the invasive plasmid gene ipaH was found in all the isolates followed by the invasion associated locus gene ial in 17.6% of isolates and sen in (11.7%). The Shigella enterotoxin genes set1A&set1Bwere found in 5.8% of the isolates. No stx1 element was found among the isolates studied. Of the 34 isolates studied, 16 showed resistance to fluoroquinolones namely, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and ofloxacin. The MICs of 16/34 quinolone resistant isolates tested ranged from 4micrograms/ml to 16micrograms/ml for ciprofloxacin, from 16 micrograms/ml to 64 micrograms/ml for ofloxacin and from 16micrograms/ml to 64micrograms/ml for levofloxacin. Sequence determination of the QRDRs of gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parEgenes showed mutations in GyrA and in ParC. The various mutations detected are as shown in Table 3. Fisher’s Exact test and Chi square test did not correlate with the presence of mutation of amino acids and high MIC of 16micrograms/ml (p value = 0.518).
Table 3

Detailed description of the virulence profile, antibiotic resistance profile, MIC of the quinolones tested, efflux pump assay, PMQRs, mutation analysis of the QRDRs and ERIC types.

Sl.noIsolate noVirulence gene profileAntibiotic resistance patternMIC values (micrograms/ml)MIC values (micrograms/ml) of Cf with efflux pump inhibitorMIC values (micrograms/ml) of Cf without efflux pump inhibitorAntibiotic resistance gene profileMutation analysisERIC type by NJ
Shet1aShet1bialsenIpaHStx1LeOfCfCf + CCCPCf—CCCPqnrAqnrBqnrCqnrSaac-6-crqepAgyrAgyrBparCparE
1S1/12----+-A/NA/CO0.750.190.380.380.38----------III
2S93/12----+-NA/CO0.50.250.750.750.75----------III
3S95/12----+-NA/CO0.750.750.250.250.25----------III
4S247/13----+-CF/CO1616848-+----106 (H→P)---I
5S390/13--+-+-A/CF/CO323216816-+----

72 (S→P)

75 (M→L)

94 (M→L)

106(H→P)

-64 (A→D)-I
6S391/13--+++-A/CF/CO323216416-+----

69 (Q→W)

71 (F→S)

90 (S→C)

161(N→H)

163(T→A)

---II
7S415/13----+-A/CO(I)0.380.50.750.750.75----------IV
8S715/13+++++-A/CF/CO1616464--+---72(S→P)---I
9S750/13----+-CO0.750.50.1250.1250.125----------III
10S839/13+++-+-A/CO10.750.50.50.5----------I
11S774/14--+-+-CO0.750.750.380.380.38----------III
12S604/14----+-CF/CO6464848-+--------IV
13S353/13---++-CO323216416----------IV
14S190/13----+-CO(I)0.510.190.190.19----------IV
15S432/14----+-CF/CO323216416-+----90 (S→C)---II
16S587/12----+-CO0.380.50.1250.1250.125----------IV
17S187/12----+-CF/NA/CO1616444-+--------IV
18S359/13----+-CF323216416-+---69(Q→W)---IV
19S163/14----+-CO0.0940.0940.380.380.38----------II
20S463/14----+-CO0.380.380.750.750.75----------IV
21S523/14----+-CO0.750.750.380.380.38----------IV
22S367/14----+-CF/CO323216416-+----75(M→L)---II
23S385/14----+-CO0.380.380.250.250.25----------II
24S404/14----+-A/CF/CO1616444-+--+-71(P→S)---II
25S448/14----+-CF/CO323216416-+--------III
26S798/14----+-Nil0.380.50.750.750.75----------III
27S409/14--+++-CF/CO323216416-+--+-

90 (S→C),

161(A→H)

---III
28S800/13----+-A/CO0.380.380.750.750.75----------III
29S427/15----+-A/CF/CO323216416-+----69 (Q→W)---III
30S442/15----+-A/CF/CO3232161616-+----

71 (F→S)

163 (T→A)

---III
31S511/15----+-CF/CO323216416-++---

75 (M→L)

161 (N→H)

---III
S548/15----+-CF/CO3232161616-++---

72 (S→P)

161 (N→H)

163 (T→A)

---III
33S608/15----+-CO0.1250.1250.250.250.25----------III
34S1068/14----+-A/CO0.380.380.750.750.75----------III
35ATCC 25922NDNDNDNDNDNDNil0.0320.0320.0120.0120.012NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

ND = Not done; Le = Levofloxacin; Of = Ofloxacin; Cf = Ciprofloxacin; CCCP = Carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP); NJ = Neighbour joining; H = Histidine; P = Proline; S = Serine; M = Methionine; L = Leucine; Q = Glutamine; W = Tryptophan; F = Phenyalanine; C = Cysteine; N = Asparagine; T = Threonine; A = Alanine

72 (S→P) 75 (M→L) 94 (M→L) 106(H→P) 69 (Q→W) 71 (F→S) 90 (S→C) 161(N→H) 163(T→A) 90 (S→C), 161(A→H) 71 (F→S) 163 (T→A) 75 (M→L) 161 (N→H) 72 (S→P) 161 (N→H) 163 (T→A) ND = Not done; Le = Levofloxacin; Of = Ofloxacin; Cf = Ciprofloxacin; CCCP = Carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP); NJ = Neighbour joining; H = Histidine; P = Proline; S = Serine; M = Methionine; L = Leucine; Q = Glutamine; W = Tryptophan; F = Phenyalanine; C = Cysteine; N = Asparagine; T = Threonine; A = Alanine Among the PMQR genes,qnrB was the most prevalent, seen in 93.7% of the ciprofloxacin resistant isolates while, qnrC was positive in 18.7%. None harboured qnrA and qnrS. Two (0.1%) of the isolates were positive for aac(6’)-lb-crgene. The qepA gene regulating the efflux pump was negative in all the isolates studied (Fig 1). Drug accumulation assay detected the presence of efflux pump activity in 9/15 (60%) among ciprofloxacin resistant isolates which showed fourfold decrease in MIC after the addition of CCCP. Spearman rank correlation coefficient and regression coefficient between PMQR gene and MIC of ciprofloxacin did not show any correlation.
Fig 1

Distribution of Plasmid mediated quinolone resistance genes.

None of the quinolone sensitive isolates harboured any of the PMQR genes. Though gyrA,gyrB, parC, parE was detected by PCR in them but none showed any mutation. All isolates were typable by ERIC-PCR. The ERIC PCR amplified DNA fragments ranged from 200 to 2500 bp. The number of bands produced ranged from 2 to 8, which were included in the statistical analysis because the bands were distinct in this region. The statistical analysis of the ERIC-PCR DNA fingerprints was performed with the PyElph graphic user interface program using hierarchical cluster analysis (Neighbour-joining method). ERIC–PCR analysis of the isolates resulted in four major ERIC groups (Table A in S1 File; Fig 2) labelled ERIC group I, II, III and IV. Type III was the dominant type (15/34 = 44.1%) followed by type IV(8/34 = 23.5%), type II and then type I(4/34 = 11.8%).
Fig 2

Phylogenetic tree using Neighbour joining method for ERIC pattern of S.sonnei.

Discussion

During the study period, S.flexneri remained the most dominant serogroup, as documented earlier [16,17]. The closest serogroup following this was the S.sonnei which showed a steep rise in 2013, maintaining a plateau till 2014 and then saw a downward trend (Table 2). All the isolates had the ipaH gene with a variability in the presence of the other virulence genes namely, ialand sen. Overall, nearly 6% (3/34) of the isolates harboured both the set1A and set1B genes. The presence of set 1A is a very unusual finding in these isolates as this gene is not known to be present in this serogroup [18,19]. This enterotoxin gene is known to be present only in S.flexneri. Dissemination of this gene among the different serogroups needs to be studied in detail, though this unusual phenomenon could be attributed to horizontal gene transmission (HGT). Evidence for the presence of set1A and set1B genes in all S.flexneri in our sample population has been documented in an earlier published report [8]. HGT is well known in Shigella due to its genomic plasticity and the presence of mobile genetic elements which have been found very frequently in its megaplasmid. These 3 isolates showing the presence of set1A and set1B were isolated from 3 different patients, none of whom had any notable severity of infection. Dysentery was noted in 24/34(70.58%) of the patients in the study group, while the remaining had complaints of watery diarrhoea. Of this 24, ial was detected in 2 (8.34%), sen in 3(12.5%), set1A and set1B in 1(4.16%) while ipaH was present in all. None of our isolates had stx1. A recent study from the USA reported S.sonnei producing Stx1 with clinical manifestations of bloody diarrhoea in the patients, suggesting a possible role of Stx1 with increased the risk of bloody diarrhoea in these patients [20]. Shiga toxin binds to the Gb3 receptors which are concentrated in the vascular endothelium, kidneys and brain but cannot act on the normal intestinal epithelium due to the absence of these receptors [21]. Contrarily, it can act on the malignant epithelium since it expresses Gb3 receptors[22]. In the present study we observed that 16(47.05%) were resistant to ciprofloxacin by the disc diffusion method and all these had high MIC of ciprofloxacin. All the 8 S.sonnei isolates from 2008 to 2011 were sensitive to ciprofloxacin, the difference being statistically significant(P value = 0.0159) (Table B in S1 file). Meanwhile, we found that the MIC of all the other quinolones tested were also high in the isolates studied. Our findings are in concordance with those reported elsewhere [23,24] but unlike a recent study from Andamans, which had shown the MICs to be very high. This finding could be partly because of the presence of efflux pumps in some (27.27%) of these isolates [14]. The drug accumulation assay showed that majority (60%) possessed efflux pump activity, which may have additionally contributed to the increased MIC in our isolates. Further, an in-depth assessment in terms of detection and expression of efflux pumps like the mdfA, tolC, ydhE, marA etc., remains to be carried out. We noted a few amino acid substitutions in the protein sequence of gyrA (Table 3). Mutations at multiple sites in gyrA lead to a higher increment in MIC of ciprofloxacin [25]. We did not find any mutation in gyrB. This has been documented earlier that majority of the mutations in clinical isolates have been detected in gyrA than gyrB [26]. We also detected mutation affecting a single amino acid in parC. It is noteworthy that the MIC is dependent on the specific amino acid substituted and the quinolone susceptibility is altered if a different amino acid is substituted at the same codon position [26]. Contrary to the usually reported mutations in GyrA Ser83 and Asp87 positions [27], we found novel mutations in the breakage reunion domain of GyrA which is known to be located between residues 67 to 106 (Table 3). Then we found two other mutations outside this domain which have not been reported elsewhere (Table 3). The most common mutation in ParC has been reported at Ser84 position but we found a mutation at position 64 (Table 3). These mutations accumulate in a step wise manner contributing to increase in MIC. Mutations were detected only in gyrA and parC but not in gyrB and parE in the ciprofloxacin resistant isolates. These are housekeeping genes and their mere presence do not signify anything and therefore it is important to look for mutations in these regions for quinolone resistance. Among the PMQR genes, qnrB was the most prevalent in our study which is in concordance with earliest reports [28,29] while in contrast to results of other studies[30]. None of our isolates had qepA, which is a plasmid mediated efflux pump and aac(6’)-lb-cr gene which corresponds to aminoglycoside acetyl transferase. Qnr proteins by themselves contribute to the increase in MIC but also facilitate in selecting chromosomal mutants during therapy with a quinolone [28]. The MIC of ciprofloxacin did not correlate with the presence of the PMQR genes or the mutations in the QRDRs. ERIC PCR has been found to be a practically useful alternative typing technique to PFGE for Shigella in small laboratories in developing countries. The major advantages are its simplicity, lesser turnaround time, cost per strain is less and need for specialized laboratory equipment is also less, besides, the results of ERIC PCR being comparable to that of PFGE [31,32]. To understand the degree of relatedness and look for any clustering among the isolates studied, ERIC PCR was performed in this study which resulted in 4 unique clusters, of which Type III was found to be of the most dominant with 44% of the isolates. The relative frequency of the ERIC type differed year wise. ERIC types III and II were significantly (p value 0.016) associated with high MIC of ciprofloxacin(16 micrograms/ml). Foodborne associated outbreaks of S.sonnei were reported from Kerala and Maharashtra in 2009 and 2010, where clonal spread was observed with little difference in their pulse types [24]. In the year 2015, there were a few reports on outbreaks of ciprofloxacin-resistant S.sonnei from the USA and Korea [20, 23]. These outbreaks were due to travel into endemic areas where such infections are prevalent and also within day care centre contacts.

Conclusions

Various mechanisms contribute to resistance, there being an occasional difference in the dominance of one over the other and it is not mandatory that all the mechanisms operate in a single strain at any given time. The horizontal transfer of plasmids carrying quinolone resistance determinants, the accumulation of chromosomal mutations and efflux pump played an important role in increasing rates of resistance in our isolates. The study reflects the emergence of S.sonnei and quinolone resistance in them documented by the presence of novel mutations in target regions of the QRDRs. In addition, the presence of PMQR genes and efflux pump activity were also noted. The acquisition of an additional virulence gene found otherwise only in S.flexneri is an intriguing finding which may be reflective of a pathogen driven continuous evolutionary effort to adapt to the natural host environs. Hence alternative strategies aimed at disarming the bacteria by blocking their virulence rather than killing them or preventing their growth need to be developed. Table A, Details of clusters of Shigella sonnei using ERIC PCR. Table B, Details of CIPROFLOXACIN resistant Shigella sonnei before and after 2011. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  29 in total

1.  Prevalence of Shigella enterotoxins 1 and 2 among Shigella strains isolated from patients with traveler's diarrhea.

Authors:  M Vargas; J Gascon; M T Jimenez De Anta; J Vila
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Shigella: wash your hands of the whole dirty business.

Authors:  Erica Weir
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-08-06       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli detected by 16-plex PCR in children with and without diarrhoea in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  I J O Bonkoungou; T Lienemann; O Martikainen; R Dembelé; I Sanou; A S Traoré; A Siitonen; N Barro; K Haukka
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 8.067

4.  Subtype prevalence, plasmid profiles and growing fluoroquinolone resistance in Shigella from Kolkata, India (2001-2007): a hospital-based study.

Authors:  Suman Nandy; Utpala Mitra; K Rajendran; Phalguni Dutta; Shanta Dutta
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  International collaborative study on the occurrence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance in Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli isolated from animals, humans, food and the environment in 13 European countries.

Authors:  Kees Veldman; Lina M Cavaco; Dik Mevius; Antonio Battisti; Alessia Franco; Nadine Botteldoorn; Mireille Bruneau; Agnès Perrin-Guyomard; Tomas Cerny; Cristina De Frutos Escobar; Beatriz Guerra; Andreas Schroeter; Montserrat Gutierrez; Katie Hopkins; Anna-Liisa Myllyniemi; Marianne Sunde; Dariusz Wasyl; Frank M Aarestrup
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  The Recent Trends of Shigellosis: A JIPMER Perspective.

Authors:  Jharna Mandal; Ganesh V; Jennifer Emelda; Mahadevan S; Subhash Chandra Parija
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2012-11

7.  Association between double mutation in gyrA gene of ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and MICs.

Authors:  J Vila; J Ruiz; F Marco; A Barcelo; P Goñi; E Giralt; T Jimenez de Anta
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Structure based in silico analysis of quinolone resistance in clinical isolates of Salmonella Typhi from India.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Sushila Dahiya; Priyanka Sharma; Sujata Sharma; Tej P Singh; Arti Kapil; Punit Kaur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Novel strain of Shigella dysenteriae serotype 7 from India.

Authors:  J Mandal; D K Poonambath; N K Bhosale; A Das
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2015-07-07

10.  Incidence, clinical presentation, and antimicrobial resistance trends in Salmonella and Shigella infections from children in Yucatan, Mexico.

Authors:  Mussaret B Zaidi; Teresa Estrada-García; Freddy D Campos; Rodolfo Chim; Francisco Arjona; Magda Leon; Alba Michell; Damien Chaussabel
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Transferable Mechanisms of Quinolone Resistance from 1998 Onward.

Authors:  Joaquim Ruiz
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Molecular characterization of antimicrobial resistance in clinical Shigella isolates during 2014 and 2015: trends in South India.

Authors:  Shalini Anandan; Dhiviya Prabaa Muthuirulandi Sethuvel; Revathi Gajendiren; Valsan Philip Verghese; Kamini Walia; Balaji Veeraraghavan
Journal:  Germs       Date:  2017-09-01

3.  Molecular characterization of fluoroquinolone and/or cephalosporin resistance in Shigella sonnei isolates from yaks.

Authors:  Zhen Zhu; Yuxiang Shi; Xuzheng Zhou; Bing Li; Jiyu Zhang
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Out of Asia: the independent rise and global spread of fluoroquinolone-resistant Shigella.

Authors:  Hao Chung The; Stephen Baker
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2018-03-29

Review 5.  Antimicrobial susceptibility profile & resistance mechanisms of Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS) priority pathogens from India.

Authors:  Balaji Veeraraghavan; Kamini Walia
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Extensive inter-strain diversity among clinical isolates of Shigella flexneri with reference to its serotype, virulence traits and plasmid incompatibility types, a study from south India over a 6-year period.

Authors:  Ankita Das; Jharna Mandal
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.181

7.  Shigella: Antibiotic-Resistance Mechanisms And New Horizons For Treatment.

Authors:  Reza Ranjbar; Abbas Farahani
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Dissecting the molecular evolution of fluoroquinolone-resistant Shigella sonnei.

Authors:  Hao Chung The; Christine Boinett; Duy Pham Thanh; Claire Jenkins; Francois-Xavier Weill; Benjamin P Howden; Mary Valcanis; Niall De Lappe; Martin Cormican; Sonam Wangchuk; Ladaporn Bodhidatta; Carl J Mason; To Nguyen Thi Nguyen; Tuyen Ha Thanh; Vinh Phat Voong; Vu Thuy Duong; Phu Huong Lan Nguyen; Paul Turner; Ryan Wick; Pieter-Jan Ceyssens; Guy Thwaites; Kathryn E Holt; Nicholas R Thomson; Maia A Rabaa; Stephen Baker
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Genotypic Diversity of Multidrug Resistant Shigella species from Iran.

Authors:  Sajjad Zamanlou; Mohammad Ahangarzadeh Rezaee; Mohammad Aghazadeh; Reza Ghotaslou; Hossein Hosseini Nave; Younes Khalili
Journal:  Infect Chemother       Date:  2018-03

10.  Virulence factors and molecular characteristics of Shigella flexneri isolated from calves with diarrhea.

Authors:  Zhen Zhu; Weiwei Wang; Mingze Cao; Qiqi Zhu; Tenghe Ma; Yongying Zhang; Guanhui Liu; Xuzheng Zhou; Bing Li; Yuxiang Shi; Jiyu Zhang
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.