| Literature DB >> 29879965 |
Zhen Zhu1,2, Yuxiang Shi2, Xuzheng Zhou1, Bing Li1, Jiyu Zhang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Members of the genus Shigella are intestinal pathogens and a major cause of seasonal outbreaks of bacterial diarrhea worldwide. Although humans are the conventional hosts of Shigella species, expansion of the Shigella host range to certain animals was recently reported. To investigate the prevalence of Shigella sonnei (S. sonnei) in yaks and perform molecular characterization, we analyzed 1132 fresh yak diarrheal stool samples and collected a total of 44 S. sonnei isolates.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance genes; MLST; PFGE; Shigella sonnei; Virulence gene
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29879965 PMCID: PMC5992640 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1500-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Statistical analysis of the distribution of 4 MLST types among 44 S. sonnei isolates in different provinces
| MLST types | Total ( | Gansu ( | Qinghai ( | Tibet ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| phase I ( | phase II ( | phase I ( | phase II ( | phase I ( | phase II ( | phase I ( | phase II ( | |
| ST76 | 1 (3.03%) | 0 | 1 (5%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ST116 | 16 (48.48%) | 11 (100%) | 3 (15%) | 4 (100%) | 10 (100%) | 5 (100%) | 3 (100%) | 2 (100%) |
| ST123 | 3 (9.09%) | 0 | 3 (15%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ST155 | 13 (39.39%) | 0 | 13 (65%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fig. 1Dendrogram of 44 XbaI-digested S. sonnei isolates based on the cluster analysis of PFGE patterns. The dendrogram was constructed using the UPGMA clustering method. The corresponding antibiotic resistance profile, PFGE pattern and background information for each strain is listed on the right side of the dendrogram. R = resistance and no bacteriostatic ring; r = resistance and positive bacteriostatic ring; N = sensitive and intermediary bacteriostatic ring
Statistical analysis of the results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 21 antibiotics for 44 S. sonnei isolates
| Antimicrobial | Antimicrobial resistance rate [No. (%)] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total ( | Gansu ( | Qinghai ( | Tibet ( | ||||
| phase I ( | phase II ( | phase I ( | phase II ( | phase I ( | phase II ( | ||
| Norfloxacin | 10 (22.73%) | 4 (20%) | 1 (25%) | 3 (30%) | 1 (20%) | 1 (33.33%) | 0 |
| Enrofloxacin | 12 (27.27%) | 5 (25%) | 1 (25%) | 3 (30%) | 1 (20%) | 2 (66.67%) | 0 |
| Levofloxacin | 4 (9.09%) | 3 (15%) | 0 | 1 (10%) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ofloxacin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Penicillin G | 44 (100%) | 20 (100%) | 4 (100%) | 10 (100%) | 5 (100%) | 3 (100%) | 2 (100%) |
| Ampicillin | 31 (70.45%) | 15 (75%) | 3 (75%) | 8 (80%) | 3 (60%) | 1 (33.33%) | 1 (50%) |
| Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cephalothin | 13 (29.55%) | 7 (35%) | 0 | 5 (50%) | 0 | 0 | 1 (50%) |
| Cephazolin | 14 (31.82%) | 7 (35%) | 1 (25%) | 5 (50%) | 0 | 0 | 1 (50%) |
| Cefoxitin | 4 (9.09%) | 0 | 0 | 4 (40%) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ceftriaxone | 9 (20.45%) | 4 (20%) | 0 | 5 (50%) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cefotaxime | 5 (11.36%) | 2 (10%) | 0 | 3 (30%) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cefepime | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Meropenem | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Imipenem | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chloramphenicol | 4 (9.09%) | 0 | 0 | 3 (30%) | 1 (20%) | 0 | 0 |
| Tetracycline | 30 (68.18%) | 14 (70%) | 2 (50%) | 8 (80%) | 3 (60%) | 2 (66.67%) | 1 (50%) |
| Streptomycin | 14 (31.82%) | 5 (25%) | 2 (50%) | 5 (50%) | 1 (20%) | 0 | 1 (50%) |
| Gentamicin | 12 (27.27%) | 6 (30%) | 0 | 5 (50%) | 1 (20%) | 0 | 0 |
| Amikacin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Analysis of amino acid types in QRDRs and ARGs in S. sonnei isolates with resistance to fluoroquinolones and/or cephalosporin
| Strain name | Antimicrobial resistance profiles | Fluoroquinolone resistance genes | Cephalosporin resistance genes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QRDR | PMQR genes |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| 83 (S) | 87 (D) | 80 (S) | |||||||
| SS036 | ENR/TE | L | D | S |
| NA | --- | --- | --- |
| SS019 | ENR/AMP/TE/CN | L | D | S |
| NA | --- | --- | --- |
| SS002 | NOR/ENR/AMP/TE | L | D | S |
| NA | --- | --- | --- |
| SS008 | NOR/ENR/AMP/TE/S | L | N | S |
| qnrB | --- | --- | --- |
| SS043 | NOR/ENR/AMP/TE/S | L | D | I |
| NA | --- | --- | --- |
| SS029 | NOR/ENR/AMP/C/TE/S/CN | L | N | S |
| NA | --- | --- | --- |
| SS018 | AMP/KZ/TE/S | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NA | NA |
| SS024 | AMP/KF/KZ/TE | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NA | NA |
| SS035 | AMP/KF/KZ/TE | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NA | NA |
| SS011 | AMP/KF/KZ/TE/CN | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NA | NA |
| SS031 | AMP/KF/KZ/CRO/TE/S/CN | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
| NA |
| SS032 | AMP/KF/KZ/CRO/TE/S/CN | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
| NA |
| SS006 | AMP/KF/KZ/FOX/CRO/C/TE/S/CN | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
| NA |
| SS027 | AMP/KF/KZ/FOX/CRO/CTX/TE/S/CN | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NA |
|
| SS004 | NOR/ENR/AMP/KF/KZ/TE/S/CN | L | N | S |
| NA |
|
| NA |
| SS028 | NOR/ENR/LEV/AMP/KF/KZ/CRO/TE/S/CN | L | N | I |
| NA |
|
| NA |
| SS013 | NOR/ENR/LEV/AMP/KF/KZ/CRO/CTX/TE/S | L | N | I |
| NA |
|
|
|
| SS039 | NOR/ENR/LEV/AMP/KF/KZ/CRO/CTX/TE/S | L | N | I |
| NA |
|
|
|
| SS021 | NOR/ENR/AMP/KF/KZ/FOX/CRO/CTX/C/TE/CN | L | N | S |
|
|
|
|
|
| SS041 | NOR/ENR/LEV/AMP/KF/KZ/FOX/CRO/CTX/TE/S/CN | L | N | I |
|
|
|
|
|
S Ser, L Leu, D Asp, N Asn, I Ile, NA not available; “---”: not detected