GOAL: Retinal prosthesis performance is limited by the variability of elicited phosphenes. The stimulating electrode's position with respect to retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) affects both perceptual threshold and phosphene shape. We created a modeling framework incorporating patient-specific anatomy and electrode location to investigate RGC activation and predict inter-electrode differences for one Argus II user. METHODS: We used ocular imaging to build a three-dimensional finite element model characterizing retinal morphology and implant placement. To predict the neural response to stimulation, we coupled electric fields with multi-compartment cable models of RGCs. We evaluated our model predictions by comparing them to patient-reported perceptual threshold measurements. RESULTS: Our model was validated by the ability to replicate clinical impedance and threshold values, along with known neurophysiological trends. Inter-electrode threshold differences in silico correlated with in vivo results. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a patient-specific retinal stimulation framework to quantitatively predict RGC activation and better explain phosphene variations.
GOAL: Retinal prosthesis performance is limited by the variability of elicited phosphenes. The stimulating electrode's position with respect to retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) affects both perceptual threshold and phosphene shape. We created a modeling framework incorporating patient-specific anatomy and electrode location to investigate RGC activation and predict inter-electrode differences for one Argus II user. METHODS: We used ocular imaging to build a three-dimensional finite element model characterizing retinal morphology and implant placement. To predict the neural response to stimulation, we coupled electric fields with multi-compartment cable models of RGCs. We evaluated our model predictions by comparing them to patient-reported perceptual threshold measurements. RESULTS: Our model was validated by the ability to replicate clinical impedance and threshold values, along with known neurophysiological trends. Inter-electrode threshold differences in silico correlated with in vivo results. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a patient-specific retinal stimulation framework to quantitatively predict RGC activation and better explain phosphene variations.
Authors: Thomas M O'Hearn; Srinivas R Sadda; James D Weiland; Mauricio Maia; Eyal Margalit; Mark S Humayun Journal: Vision Res Date: 2006-05-24 Impact factor: 1.886
Authors: Shelley I Fried; Aaron C W Lasker; Neal J Desai; Donald K Eddington; Joseph F Rizzo Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2009-02-04 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Anthony N Kuo; Ryan P McNabb; Stephanie J Chiu; Mays A El-Dairi; Sina Farsiu; Cynthia A Toth; Joseph A Izatt Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Andrew C Weitz; Devyani Nanduri; Matthew R Behrend; Alejandra Gonzalez-Calle; Robert J Greenberg; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Timothy B Esler; Robert R Kerr; Bahman Tahayori; David B Grayden; Hamish Meffin; Anthony N Burkitt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dorsa Haji Ghaffari; Akwasi Darkwah Akwaboah; Ehsan Mirzakhalili; James D Weiland Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2022-01-04 Impact factor: 3.802