Literature DB >> 27489520

Accuracy in automatic image registration between MV cone beam computed tomography and planning kV computed tomography in image guided radiotherapy.

Nithya Kanakavelu1, E James Jebaseelan Samuel2.   

Abstract

AIM: To verify the accuracy of automatic image registration (IR) between the planning kilo voltage computed tomography (kV CT) and megavoltage cone beam computed tomography (MV CBCT) datasets using phantom and patient images.
BACKGROUND: The automatic IR between MV CBCT and planning kV CT is a fast solution for performing online image guided radiotherapy (IGRT). The IR accuracy has to be verified periodically as it directly affects patient setup accuracy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The automatic IR accuracy was evaluated using image quality phantom acquired with different kV CT slice thickness, different MV CBCT acquisition MUs and reconstruction slice size and thickness. The IR accuracy was also evaluated on patient images on different anatomical sites such as brain, head & neck, thorax and pelvis. The uncertainty in the automatic registration was assessed by introducing known offset to kV CT dataset and compared with the registration results.
RESULTS: The result with the phantom images was within 2 mm in all three translational directions. The accuracy in automatic IR using patient images was within 2 mm in most of the cases. 3 mm planning kV CT slice thickness was sufficient to perform automatic IR successfully within 2 mm accuracy. The MV CBCT reconstruction parameters such as slice thickness and slice size had no effect on the registration accuracy.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that the automatic IR is accurate within 2 mm and provides confidence in performing them between planning kV CT and MV CBCT image datasets for online image guided radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automatic image registration; Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT); Image guided radiotherapy (IGRT)

Year:  2016        PMID: 27489520      PMCID: PMC4961788          DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2016.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother        ISSN: 1507-1367


  8 in total

1.  Effect of image-guidance frequency on geometric accuracy and setup margins in radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer.

Authors:  Jane Higgins; Andrea Bezjak; Andrew Hope; Tony Panzarella; Winnie Li; John B C Cho; Tim Craig; Anthony Brade; Alexander Sun; Jean-Pierre Bissonnette
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Automatic prostate localization on cone-beam CT scans for high precision image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Monique H P Smitsmans; Josien de Bois; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Anja Betgen; Lambert J Zijp; David A Jaffray; Joos V Lebesque; Marcel van Herk
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Analysis of interfraction prostate motion using megavoltage cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Kevin C Bylund; John E Bayouth; Mark C Smith; A Curtis Hass; Sudershan K Bhatia; John M Buatti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  A cone-beam megavoltage CT scanner for treatment verification in conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  M A Mosleh-Shirazi; P M Evans; W Swindell; S Webb; M Partridge
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Assessment and evaluation of MV image guidance system performance in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nithya Kanakavelu; E James Jebaseelan Samuel
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-02-07

6.  Low-dose megavoltage cone-beam CT for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jean Pouliot; Ali Bani-Hashemi; Josephine Chen; Michelle Svatos; Farhad Ghelmansarai; Matthias Mitschke; Michele Aubin; Ping Xia; Olivier Morin; Kara Bucci; Mack Roach; Paco Hernandez; Zirao Zheng; Dimitre Hristov; Lynn Verhey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Megavoltage computed tomography imaging: a potential tool to guide and improve the delivery of thoracic radiation therapy.

Authors:  James S Welsh; Kristin Bradley; Kenneth J Ruchala; Thomas R Mackie; Rafael Mañon; Rakesh Patel; Peggy Wiederholt; Michael Lock; Susanta Hui; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 8.  Megavoltage cone-beam CT: system description and clinical applications.

Authors:  Olivier Morin; Amy Gillis; Josephine Chen; Michèle Aubin; M Kara Bucci; Mack Roach; Jean Pouliot
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.482

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Registration methods in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Paweł Czajkowski; Tomasz Piotrowski
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-10-10

2.  Study to Compare the Effect of Different Registration Methods on Patient Setup Uncertainties in Cone-beam Computed Tomography during Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  P Mohandass; D Khanna; T Manoj Kumar; T Thiyagaraj; C Saravanan; Narendra Kumar Bhalla; Abhishek Puri
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

3.  Comparative evaluation of image registration methods with different interest regions in lung cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Xiaohui Cao; Ming Liu; Fushan Zhai; Nan Li; Feng Li; Chaoen Bao; Yinliang Liu; Gang Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 1.930

4.  Using previously registered cone beam computerized tomography images to facilitate online computerized tomography to cone beam computerized tomography image registration in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jian Liang; Qiang Liu; Inga Grills; Thomas Guerrero; Craig Stevens; Di Yan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.