Literature DB >> 15086969

Megavoltage computed tomography imaging: a potential tool to guide and improve the delivery of thoracic radiation therapy.

James S Welsh1, Kristin Bradley, Kenneth J Ruchala, Thomas R Mackie, Rafael Mañon, Rakesh Patel, Peggy Wiederholt, Michael Lock, Susanta Hui, Minesh P Mehta.   

Abstract

Helical tomotherapy is an innovative means of delivering intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using a device that merges features of a linear accelerator and a helical computed tomography (CT) scanner. The tomotherapy unit can generate CT images from the megavoltage radiation it uses for treatment as often as needed during a course of radiation therapy. These megavoltage CT (MVCT) images offer verification of patient position prior to and potentially during radiation therapy, and provide considerably more anatomical detail than the conventional radiation therapy port films used for patient set-up verification. Also, MVCT imaging may enable reconstruction of the radiation dose delivered, thereby providing unprecedented verification of the actual treatment. These key features of helical tomotherapy distinguish it from other IMRT approaches. We report results from a pilot feasibility trial of 10 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on whom we obtained MVCT images using a prototype helical tomotherapy system. All patients underwent conventional CT imaging for radiation therapy treatment planning. Specific aims were to subjectively compare MVCT and conventional CT images and then to objectively compare the 2 modalities by contouring tumors and performing a volumetric comparison. Seven patients had disease located primarily in the lung parenchyma, 2 primarily in the mediastinum, and 1 in both. When evaluated by location, all 7 patients with lesions primarily in the lung parenchyma had subjectively high-quality MVCT images. Objectively, the volumetric agreement between conventional and MVCT for parenchymal lesions was excellent in 5 of the 7 patients. Megavoltage CT imaging via the helical tomotherapy prototype provided adequate information for use in verification of patient position and dose reconstruction for lesions within the pulmonary parenchyma, but presently appears suboptimal for primarily mediastinal disease. Further studies are ongoing to optimize MVCT imaging and better define its utility in patients with NSCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15086969     DOI: 10.3816/CLC.2004.n.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer        ISSN: 1525-7304            Impact factor:   4.785


  7 in total

1.  Accuracy in automatic image registration between MV cone beam computed tomography and planning kV computed tomography in image guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nithya Kanakavelu; E James Jebaseelan Samuel
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-07-22

2.  A comprehensive assessment by tumor site of patient setup using daily MVCT imaging from more than 3,800 helical tomotherapy treatments.

Authors:  Leah K Schubert; David C Westerly; Wolfgang A Tomé; Minesh P Mehta; Emilie T Soisson; Thomas R Mackie; Mark A Ritter; Deepak Khuntia; Paul M Harari; Bhudatt R Paliwal
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging for adaptive cobalt tomotherapy: A proposal.

Authors:  Tomas Kron; David Eyles; L John Schreiner; Jerry Battista
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2006-10

4.  Medical physics practice in the next decade.

Authors:  Bhudatt Paliwal
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2006-07

5.  Tomotherapy as a tool in image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT): current clinical experience and outcomes.

Authors:  S Yartsev; T Kron; J Van Dyk
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-01-01

Review 6.  Imaging in radiation oncology: a perspective.

Authors:  Laura A Dawson; Cynthia Ménard
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010

7.  A planning study for palliative spine treatment using StatRT and megavoltage CT simulation.

Authors:  Yi Rong; Poonam Yadav; Bhudatt Paliwal; Lu Shang; James S Welsh
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.