Literature DB >> 2748118

Assessing the utility of reliability indices for automated visual fields. Testing ocular hypertensives.

M Bickler-Bluth1, G L Trick, A E Kolker, D G Cooper.   

Abstract

Monocular (right eye) visual fields were recorded with the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer (30-2 Program) at baseline as well as 6 and 12 months later in 120 patients with established ocular hypertension. Indices of field reliability (fixation loss, less than 20%; false-positives and false-negatives, less than 33%) and field sensitivity (mean deviation [MD] and pattern standard deviation [PSD]) were examined. At baseline, 35% of patients exhibited low reliability (LR) fields, a figure which decreased to approximately 25% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. During this period, over 50% of patients produced at least one LR field, whereas 8.3% were unable to produce even one reliable field. Exhibition of a LR field appeared to be independent of patient age. Fixation errors, the major cause of LR fields, decreased by approximately 10% over the 12-month period; most patients had between 20 and 32% fixation errors. The incidence of significant defects identified by PSD was greater than that for MD; this was true for both reliable and LR fields. It is suggested that increasing the fixation loss criteria for assessing patient reliability to a 33% cutoff might substantially increase the percentage of fields graded reliable with minimal effect on the sensitivity or specificity of the test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2748118     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32840-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  24 in total

1.  Use of a portable head mounted perimetry system to assess bedside visual fields.

Authors:  D A Hollander; N J Volpe; M L Moster; G T Liu; L J Balcer; K D Judy; S L Galetta
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Using unsupervised learning with independent component analysis to identify patterns of glaucomatous visual field defects.

Authors:  Michael H Goldbaum; Pamela A Sample; Zuohua Zhang; Kwokleung Chan; Jiucang Hao; Te-Won Lee; Catherine Boden; Christopher Bowd; Rupert Bourne; Linda Zangwill; Terrence Sejnowski; David Spinak; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Unsupervised learning with independent component analysis can identify patterns of glaucomatous visual field defects.

Authors:  Michael Henry Goldbaum
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2005

4.  Influence of missed catch trials on the visual field in normal subjects.

Authors:  M A Cascairo; W C Stewart; S E Sutherland
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Factors that influence the prevalence of positive catch trials in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  M Reynolds; W C Stewart; S Sutherland
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Laser scanning tomography of the optic nerve head in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.

Authors:  W V Hatch; J G Flanagan; E E Etchells; D E Williams-Lyn; G E Trope
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Influence of missed catch trials on the visual field in normal subjects.

Authors:  F Fankhauser
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Monitoring Glaucomatous Functional Loss Using an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Dashboard.

Authors:  Siamak Yousefi; Tobias Elze; Louis R Pasquale; Osamah Saeedi; Mengyu Wang; Lucy Q Shen; Sarah R Wellik; Carlos G De Moraes; Jonathan S Myers; Michael V Boland
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Clinical evaluation of a multi-fixation campimeter for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.

Authors:  E Mutlukan; B E Damato; J L Jay
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Effect of a patient training video on visual field test reliability.

Authors:  H Sherafat; P G D Spry; A Waldock; J M Sparrow; J P Diamond
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.