| Literature DB >> 27472962 |
Hua-Zhen Tan1,2, Zhi-Yong Wu1,3, Jian-Yi Wu1,2, Lin Long1,2, Ji-Wei Jiao1,2, Yu-Hui Peng1,4, Yi-Wei Xu1,2,4, Shan-Shan Li1,2, Wei Wang1,2, Jian-Jun Zhang1,5, En-Min Li6,7, Li-Yan Xu8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: SLC52A3 was recently identified as a susceptibility gene for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, associations between the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs13042395 (C > T) and rs3746803 (G > A) in SLC52A3 and risk, tumor characteristics and survival of ESCC patients remain inconclusive and of unknown prognostic significance.Entities:
Keywords: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Relapse-free survival; SLC52A3 gene; Single nucleotide polymorphism; Tumor characteristics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27472962 PMCID: PMC4966773 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2588-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Characteristics of ESCC cases and controls
| Variables | SNP and ESCC risk | SNP and ESCC progression | SNP and ESCC prognosis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESCC ( | Control ( | ESCC ( | ESCC ( | |
| Gender | ||||
| Female | 109 | 109 | 87 | 79 |
| Male | 370 | 370 | 256 | 209 |
| Age (years) (M ± SD) | 59.92 ± 9.34 | 59.61 ± 8.84 | 58.39 ± 8.83 | 58.28 ± 8.84 |
| Size of tumor (cm) | ||||
| ≤3 | 101 | 98 | 89 | |
| 4–5 | 160 | 158 | 130 | |
| ≥6 | 89 | 87 | 69 | |
| Unknown | 129 | 0 | 0 | |
| Depth of tumor invasion | ||||
| Tis | 8 | 8 | 5 | |
| T1 | 29 | 29 | 24 | |
| T2 | 45 | 45 | 39 | |
| T3 | 239 | 239 | 216 | |
| T4 | 22 | 22 | 4 | |
| Unknown | 136 | 0 | 0 | |
| Regional lymph node metastasis | ||||
| N0 | 178 | 178 | 150 | |
| N1 | 103 | 103 | 88 | |
| N2 | 40 | 40 | 34 | |
| N3 | 22 | 22 | 16 | |
| Unknown | 136 | 0 | 0 | |
| Distant metastasis | ||||
| M0 | 337 | 337 | 288 | |
| M1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | |
| Unknown | 136 | 0 | 0 | |
| Tumor location | ||||
| Upper thoracic | 56 | 27 | 19 | |
| Middle thoracic | 251 | 191 | 158 | |
| Lower thoracic | 143 | 125 | 111 | |
| Unknown | 29 | 0 | 0 | |
| TNM classification | ||||
| 0 | 8 | 8 | 4 | |
| I | 42 (3)a | 39 | 35 | |
| II | 156 (18)a | 138 | 124 | |
| III | 185 (33)a | 152 | 125 | |
| IV | 20 (14)a | 6 | 0 | |
| Unknown | 68 | 0 | 0 | |
| Radiotherapy after surgery | ||||
| No | 204 | 204 | ||
| Yes | 84 | 84 | ||
| Unknown | 55 | 0 | ||
| Chemotherapy after surgery | ||||
| No | 207 | 207 | ||
| Yes | 81 | 81 | ||
| Unknown | 55 | 0 | ||
All associations are significant at P < 0.05
ESCC esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, SNP single nucleotide polymorphism, M mean, SD standard deviation
aData shown in parentheses represent patients without tumor resection
Association between SNPs in SLC52A3 and ESCC risk in the Chinese population (NESCC = 479, Ncontrol = 479)
| Genotype | ESCC | Control | OR (95 % CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | |||
| rs13042395 | ||||
| CC | 135 (28.18) | 147 (30.69) | 1.00 (reference) | |
| CT | 236 (49.27) | 218 (45.51) | 1.18 (0.88–1.59) | 0.28 |
| TT | 108 (22.55) | 114 (23.80) | 1.03 (0.73–1.47) | 0.86 |
| CT + TT | 344 (71.82) | 332 (69.31) | 1.14 (0.86–1.50) | 0.36 |
| CC + CT | 371 (77.45) | 365 (76.20) | 1.00 (reference) | |
| TT | 108 (22.55) | 114 (23.80) | 0.93 (0.69–1.26) | 0.65 |
| rs3746803 | ||||
| GG | 425 (88.73) | 424 (88.52) | 1.00 (reference) | |
| GA | 55 (11.48) | 53 (11.06) | 1.00 (0.67–1.49) | 0.99 |
| AA | 1 (0.21) | 2 (0.42) | 0.50 (0.05–5.52) | 0.57 |
| GA + AA | 54 (11.27) | 55 (11.48) | 0.98 (0.66–1.46) | 0.92 |
| GG + GA | 478 (99.79) | 477 (99.58) | 1.00 (reference) | |
| AA | 1 (0.21) | 2 (0.42) | 0.50 (0.05–5.52) | 0.57 |
All associations are significant at P < 0.05
SNP single nucleotide polymorphism, ESCC esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, OR odds ratio, 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval
Association between SNPs in SLC52A3 and clinical characteristics of ESCC in the Chinese population (NESCC = 343)
| Genotype | Tumor size (≤3 cm/4–5 cm/≥6 cm) | Depth of tumor invasion ((Tis + T1)/T2/T3/T4) | Regional lymph node metastasis (N0/N1/N2/N3) | Distant metastasis (M0/M1) | TNM classification ((0 + I)/II/III/IV) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95 % CI) |
| OR (95 % CI) |
| OR (95 % CI) |
| OR (95 % CI) |
| OR (95 % CI) |
| |
| rs13042395 | ||||||||||
| CC | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | |||||
| CT | 1.17 (0.73–1.86) | 0.53 | 0.90 (0.52–1.55) | 0.71 | 0.83 (0.52–1.33) | 0.45 | 0.83 (0.14–5.04) | 0.84 | 0.79 (0.41–1.26) | 0.33 |
| TT | 1.18 (0.67–2.06) | 0.57 | 0.82 (0.43–1.56) | 0.55 | 0.55 (0.31–0.98) | 0.04 | 0.59 (0.05–6.63) | 0.67 | 0.72 (0.49–1.27) | 0.25 |
| CT + TT | 1.17 (0.75–1.82) | 0.49 | 0.88 (0.52–1.46) | 0.61 | 0.73 (0.47–1.14) | 0.16 | 0.75 (0.14–4.17) | 0.74 | 0.76 (0.49–1.20) | 0.24 |
| CC + CT | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | |||||
| TT | 1.07 (0.67–1.70) | 0.79 | 0.88 (0.52–1.50) | 0.63 | 0.62 (0.38–1.01) | 0.06 | 0.66 (0.08–5.77) | 0.71 | 0.84 (0.52–1.34) | 0.46 |
| rs3746803 | ||||||||||
| GG | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | |||||
| GA + AA | 1.1 (0.57–2.09) | 0.78 | 1.4 (0.65–3.00) | 0.39 | 1.06 (0.55–2.03) | 0.87 | 1.73 (0.20–15.02) | 0.62 | 1.3 (0.67–2.51) | 0.43 |
All associations are significant at P < 0.05
SNP single nucleotide polymorphism, ESCC esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, OR odds ratio, 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval
Fig. 1Kaplan-Meier analysis of relapse-free survival and overall survival for rs13042395 polymorphisms in the SLC52A3 gene in ESCC cases. a The median relapse-free survival time for CC, CT and TT genotype carriers was 24, 23 and 30 months, respectively. The differences of relapse-free survival time among CC, CT and TT genotype carriers were not significant (P = 0.10). b The median relapse-free survival time for (CC + CT) genotype carriers and TT genotype carriers was 23 and 30 months, respectively. Relapse-free survival time of TT genotype carriers was significantly longer compared with that of (CC + CT) genotype carriers (P = 0.03). c The median relapse-free survival time for CC genotype carriers and (CT + TT) genotype carriers was 24 and 25 months, respectively. The difference of relapse-free survival time between CC and (CT + TT) genotype carriers was not significant (P = 0.59). d The median overall survival time for CC, CT and TT genotype carriers was 26, 27 and 32 months, respectively. The differences of overall survival time among CC, CT and TT genotype carriers were not significant (P = 0.24). e The median overall survival time for (CC + CT) genotype carriers and TT genotype carriers was 27 and 32 months, respectively. The difference of overall survival time between (CC + CT) and TT genotype carriers was not significant (P = 0.12). f The median overall survival time for CC genotype carriers and (CT + TT) genotype carriers was 26 and 29 months, respectively. The difference of overall survival time between CC and (CT + TT) genotype carriers was not significant (P = 0.26)
Univariate analyses and multivariate analysis of factors associated with relapse-free survival for ESCC patients (NESCC = 288)
| Variables | HR | 95 % CI for HR |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Univariate analyses | ||||
| Gender | ||||
| Female | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| Male | 1.12 | 0.75 | 1.66 | 0.58 |
| Age (years) | 0.99 | 0.97 | 1.01 | 0.42 |
| rs13042395 | ||||
| CC | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| CT | 1.05 | 0.70 | 1.57 | 0.82 |
| TT | 0.62 | 0.36 | 1.06 | 0.08 |
| CT + TT | 0.90 | 0.61 | 1.33 | 0.60 |
| CC + CT | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| TT | 0.60 | 0.38 | 0.96 | 0.03 |
| rs3746803 | ||||
| GG | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| GA + AA | 1.23 | 0.72 | 2.12 | 0.44 |
| Tumor size (cm) | ||||
| ≤3 | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| 4–5 | 1.48 | 0.97 | 2.27 | 0.07 |
| ≥6 | 1.40 | 0.85 | 2.31 | 0.18 |
|
| 0.18 | |||
| Depth of tumor invasion | ||||
| Tis + T1 | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| T2 | 5.42 | 1.21 | 24.24 | 0.03 |
| T3 | 10.78 | 2.66 | 43.70 | <0.001 |
| T4 | 4.68 | 0.42 | 51.70 | 0.21 |
|
| 0.001 | |||
| Regional lymph node metastasis | ||||
| N0 | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| N1 | 2.63 | 1.74 | 3.98 | <0.001 |
| N2 | 3.73 | 2.24 | 6.23 | <0.001 |
| N3 | 3.46 | 1.74 | 6.91 | <0.001 |
|
| <0.001 | |||
| Tumor location | ||||
| Upper thoracic | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| Middle thoracic | 0.63 | 0.34 | 1.16 | 0.14 |
| Lower thoracic | 0.72 | 0.38 | 1.36 | 0.31 |
|
| 0.31 | |||
| TNM classification | ||||
| 0 + I | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| II | 5.83 | 1.81 | 18.76 | 0.003 |
| III | 14.21 | 4.47 | 45.17 | <0.001 |
|
| <0.001 | |||
| Radiotherapy after surgery | ||||
| No | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| Yes | 2.12 | 1.48 | 3.03 | <0.001 |
| Chemotherapy after surgery | ||||
| No | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| Yes | 1.69 | 1.17 | 2.44 | 0.005 |
| Multivariate analysis | ||||
| rs13042395 | ||||
| CC + CT | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| TT | 0.62 | 0.38 | 0.99 | 0.046 |
| Depth of tumor invasion | ||||
| Tis + T1 | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| T2 | 4.23 | 0.94 | 19.11 | 0.06 |
| T3 | 6.37 | 1.54 | 26.40 | 0.01 |
| T4 | 1.47 | 0.13 | 16.94 | 0.76 |
|
| 0.001 | |||
| Regional lymph node metastasis | ||||
| N0 | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| N1 | 2.06 | 1.36 | 3.13 | <0.001 |
| N2 | 2.88 | 1.70 | 4.86 | 0.001 |
| N3 | 2.08 | 1.01 | 4.30 | <0.001 |
|
| 0.047 | |||
| Radiotherapy after surgery | ||||
| No | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| Yes | 1.68 | 1.16 | 2.43 | 0.006 |
All associations are significant at P < 0.05
ESCC esophageal squamous cell carcinomas, HR hazard ratio, 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval
Fig. 2Promoter activity of rs13042395 polymorphisms in the SLC52A3 gene in ESCC cells. a Luciferase reporter activity of the SLC52A3 rs13042395 locus in KYSE150 and KYSE180 cells. Constructions of pGLP-V, pGLP-C or pGLP-T were co-transfected into the cells with pRL-TK in the indicated amounts. The empty vector pGLP-V was used as a control. Firefly luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla luciferase activity of the internal control. The experiments were repeated three times. Error bars indicate 95 % confidence intervals, one asterisk indicates statistical significance with P < 0.05, two asterisks indicate statistical significance with P < 0.01. Statistical significance was determined by two-sided one-way analysis of variance along with the Bonferroni post hoc test. b Electrophoretic mobility shift assay analysis of specific interaction between nuclear proteins and the rs13042395 site of SLC52A3. The nuclear protein was extracted from KYSE150 cells. Three micrograms of extract were incubated with a biotin end-labeled oligonucleotide GGCCAGTGCACCGTCATTGTGTGGGCTGGG (CC probes, lanes 1 through 4) or GGCCAGTGCACCGTTATTGTGTGGGCTGGG (TT probes, lanes 5 through 8) in the rs13042395 site. Binding specificity was confirmed by chasing labeled CC or TT probes with a 200-fold molar excess of unlabeled CC (lane 4) or TT probe (lane 7). Labeled probes free of nuclear extracts migrated as shown in lanes1 and 4. Four shift bands presented in lane 2 (CC polymorphism), but only two in lane 6 (TT polymorphism)