Literature DB >> 31396315

Prognostic alternative splicing signatures and underlying regulatory network in esophageal carcinoma.

Zu-Cheng Xie1, Hua-Yu Wu2, Fu-Chao Ma1, Yi-Wu Dang3, Zhi-Gang Peng1, Hua-Fu Zhou4, Gang Chen3.   

Abstract

Alternative splicing (AS) has been widely reported to play an important role in cancers, including esophageal carcinoma (ESCA). However, no study has comprehensively investigated the clinical use of combination of prognostic AS events and clinicopathological parameters. Therefore, we collected 165 ESCA patients including 83 esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and 82 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas to explore the survival rate associated with seven types of AS events. Prognostic predictors for the clinical outcomes of ESCA patients were built. Predictive prognosis models of the alternative acceptor site in ESCA (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.83), alternative donor site in EAC (AUC = 0.99), and alternative terminator site in ESCC (AUC = 0.974) showed the best predictive efficacy. A novel combined prognostic model of AS events and clinicopathological parameters in ESCA was also constructed. Combined prognostic models of ESCA all showed better predictive efficacy than independent AS models or clinicopathological parameters model. Through constructing splicing regulatory network, the expression of AS factor was found to be negatively correlated with the most favorable AS events. Moreover, gene amplification, mutation, and copy number variation of AS genes were commonly observed, which may indicate the molecular mechanism of how the AS events influence survival. Conclusively, the constructed prognostic models based on AS events, especially the combined prognostic models of AS signatures and clinicopathological parameters could be used to predict the outcome of ESCA patients. Moreover, the splicing regulatory network and genomic alteration in ESCA could be used for illuminating the potential molecular mechanism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternative splicing; esophageal carcinoma; prognosis; splicing factor

Year:  2019        PMID: 31396315      PMCID: PMC6684923     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transl Res        ISSN: 1943-8141            Impact factor:   4.060


  52 in total

1.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks.

Authors:  Paul Shannon; Andrew Markiel; Owen Ozier; Nitin S Baliga; Jonathan T Wang; Daniel Ramage; Nada Amin; Benno Schwikowski; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  Function of alternative splicing.

Authors:  Olga Kelemen; Paolo Convertini; Zhaiyi Zhang; Yuan Wen; Manli Shen; Marina Falaleeva; Stefan Stamm
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.688

3.  Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal.

Authors:  Jianjiong Gao; Bülent Arman Aksoy; Ugur Dogrusoz; Gideon Dresdner; Benjamin Gross; S Onur Sumer; Yichao Sun; Anders Jacobsen; Rileen Sinha; Erik Larsson; Ethan Cerami; Chris Sander; Nikolaus Schultz
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 8.192

Review 4.  Prognosis-related microRNAs in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Liu Hong; Yu Han; Hongwei Zhang; Qingchuan Zhao; Kaichun Wu; Daiming Fan
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 5.  Alternative splicing in cancer: implications for biology and therapy.

Authors:  J Chen; W A Weiss
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 6.  Hallmarks of alternative splicing in cancer.

Authors:  S Oltean; D O Bates
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  SpliceAid 2: a database of human splicing factors expression data and RNA target motifs.

Authors:  Francesco Piva; Matteo Giulietti; Alessandra Ballone Burini; Giovanni Principato
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 4.878

8.  Specific MUC1 splice variants are correlated with tumor progression in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Kolsoum Rezaie Kahkhaie; Omeed Moaven; Mohammad Reza Abbaszadegan; Mehdi Montazer; Mehran Gholamin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  LincRNA-uc002yug.2 involves in alternative splicing of RUNX1 and serves as a predictor for esophageal cancer and prognosis.

Authors:  H Wu; J Zheng; J Deng; L Zhang; N Li; W Li; F Li; J Lu; Y Zhou
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  SpliceSeq: a resource for analysis and visualization of RNA-Seq data on alternative splicing and its functional impacts.

Authors:  Michael C Ryan; James Cleland; RyangGuk Kim; Wing Chung Wong; John N Weinstein
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  5 in total

1.  The landscape and biological relevance of aberrant alternative splicing events in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Quanyou Wu; Yuan Zhang; Haiyin An; Wei Sun; Ruozheng Wang; Meng Liu; Kaitai Zhang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Alternative splicing events implicated in carcinogenesis and prognosis of thyroid gland cancer.

Authors:  Zeng-Hong Wu; Yun Tang; Yue Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Systematic Profiling of Alternative Splicing for Sarcoma Patients Reveals Novel Prognostic Biomarkers Associated with Tumor Microenvironment and Immune Cells.

Authors:  Chuan Hu; Yuanhe Wang; Chuan Liu; Rui Shen; Bo Chen; Kang Sun; Huili Rao; Lin Ye; Jianjun Ye; Shaoqi Tian
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-07-19

4.  Alternative ANKHD1 transcript promotes proliferation and inhibits migration in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Wenhuizi Sun; Runzhi Huang; Zhenyu Li; Yaru Zhu; Yan Bai; Siyu Wu; Jingshuai Wang; Yan Xiao; Shuyuan Xian; Xiaowen Tong; Jie Zhang; Yi Guo; Yiqin Ouyang
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.083

5.  LIQA: long-read isoform quantification and analysis.

Authors:  Yu Hu; Li Fang; Xuelian Chen; Jiang F Zhong; Mingyao Li; Kai Wang
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 13.583

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.