Literature DB >> 14613617

Echolocation range and wingbeat period match in aerial-hawking bats.

M W Holderied1, O von Helversen.   

Abstract

Aerial-hawking bats searching the sky for prey face the problem that flight and echolocation exert independent and possibly conflicting influences on call intervals. These bats can only exploit their full echolocation range unambiguously if they emit their next call when all echoes from the preceding call would have arrived. However, not every call interval is equally available. The need to reduce the high energetic costs of echolocation forces aerial-hawking bats to couple call emission to their wingbeat. We compared the wingbeat periods of 11 aerial-hawking bat species with the delays of the last-expected echoes. Acoustic flight-path tracking was employed to measure the source levels (SLs) of echolocation calls in the field. SLs were very high, extending the known range to 133 dB peak equivalent sound pressure level. We calculated the maximum detection distances for insects, larger flying objects and background targets. Wingbeat periods were derived from call intervals. Small and medium-sized bats in fact matched their maximum detection range for insects and larger flying targets to their wingbeat period. The tendency to skip calls correlated with the species' detection range for background targets. We argue that a species' call frequency is at such a pitch that the resulting detection range matches their wingbeat period.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14613617      PMCID: PMC1691500          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  8 in total

1.  Echolocation by the barbastelle bat, Barbastella barbastellus.

Authors:  A Denzinger; B M Siemers; A Schaub; H U Schnitzler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  No cost of echolocation for bats in flight.

Authors:  J R Speakman; P A Racey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-04-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The detection of phantom targets in noise by serotine bats; negative evidence for the coherent receiver.

Authors:  N Troest; B Møhl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Normal hearing thresholds for clicks.

Authors:  D R Stapells; T W Picton; A D Smith
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The activity and function of the middle-ear muscles in echo-locating bats.

Authors:  O W Henson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Acoustic sensitivity of the noctuid tympanic organ and its range for the cries of bats.

Authors:  K D Roeder
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.354

7.  Frequency sensitivity and directional hearing in the gleaning bat, Plecotus auritus (Linnaeus 1758).

Authors:  R B Coles; A Guppy; M E Anderson; P Schlegel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  The synchronisation of signal emission with wingbeat during the approach phase in soprano pipistrelles (Pipistrellus pygmaeus).

Authors:  J G Wong; D A Waters
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.312

  8 in total
  59 in total

1.  'No cost of echolocation for flying bats' revisited.

Authors:  Christian C Voigt; Daniel Lewanzik
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 2.200

Review 2.  The communicative potential of bat echolocation pulses.

Authors:  Gareth Jones; Björn M Siemers
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  Sensory acquisition in active sensing systems.

Authors:  M E Nelson; M A MacIver
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-01-28       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  Bat echolocation calls: adaptation and convergent evolution.

Authors:  Gareth Jones; Marc W Holderied
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Listening for males and bats: spectral processing in the hearing organ of Neoconocephalus bivocatus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae).

Authors:  Gerlinde Höbel; Johannes Schul
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-06-16       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Global warming alters sound transmission: differential impact on the prey detection ability of echolocating bats.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Klemen Koselj; Sándor Zsebok; Björn M Siemers; Holger R Goerlitz
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  What the bat's voice tells the bat's brain.

Authors:  Nachum Ulanovsky; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Inconspicuous echolocation in hoary bats (Lasiurus cinereus).

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Theodore J Weller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Variability in echolocation call intensity in a community of horseshoe bats: a role for resource partitioning or communication?

Authors:  Maike Schuchmann; Björn M Siemers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Probing the natural scene by echolocation in bats.

Authors:  Cynthia F Moss; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.