Literature DB >> 2745882

Detection of gaps in sinusoids and pulse trains by patients with cochlear implants.

R V Shannon1.   

Abstract

Gap detection thresholds were measured in patients with the Nucleus and Symbion cochlear implants as a function of several current waveform parameters. Detection of gaps in an electrical sinusoidal stimulus or in a train of biphasic pulses by implanted patients was similar to detection of gaps in comparable acoustic stimuli by normal listeners. Threshold gaps were 20-50 ms for low-level stimuli and improved with stimulus level to 2-5 ms for high-level stimuli. Gap detection performance was not affected by the electrode position in the cochlea or by the distance between stimulating electrodes. The data from most patients were well fitted by a trading relation between the duration of the gap and the square of stimulus intensity, indicating energy detection. The similarity of gap thresholds for normal subjects and implant patients suggests that many details of the peripheral neural activity are probably not important for this task, and that there is no retrocochlear loss of auditory temporal resolution with sensorineural hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2745882     DOI: 10.1121/1.397753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Psychophysical performance and Mandarin tone recognition in noise by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Chaogang Wei; Keli Cao; Xin Jin; Xiaowei Chen; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Psychophysical assessment of stimulation sites in auditory prosthesis electrode arrays.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Rose A Burkholder-Juhasz; Teresa A Zwolan; Li Xu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Sequential stream segregation using temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Robert S Hong; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory temporal acuity probed with cochlear implant stimulation and cortical recording.

Authors:  Alana E Kirby; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The effect of temporal gap identification on speech perception by users of cochlear implants.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Adam R Kaiser; Ted A Meyer; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Predicting Speech Recognition Using the Speech Intelligibility Index and Other Variables for Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Sungmin Lee; Lisa Lucks Mendel; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Ray L Goldsworthy; Lorraine A Delhorne; Louis D Braida; Charlotte M Reed
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-02-21

8.  The Effect of Short-Term Auditory Training on Speech in Noise Perception and Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Adults with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Nathan Barlow; Suzanne C Purdy; Mridula Sharma; Ellen Giles; Vijay Narne
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2016-02

9.  Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu; Chao-Gang Wei; Ke-Li Cao
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  MUSIC APPRECIATION AND TRAINING FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS: A REVIEW.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2012-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.