Literature DB >> 27455417

In Vivo Kinematics of the Tibiotalar and Subtalar Joints in Asymptomatic Subjects: A High-Speed Dual Fluoroscopy Study.

Koren E Roach, Bibo Wang, Ashley L Kapron, Niccolo M Fiorentino, Charles L Saltzman, K Bo Foreman, Andrew E Anderson.   

Abstract

Measurements of joint kinematics are essential to understand the pathomechanics of ankle disease and the effects of treatment. Traditional motion capture techniques do not provide measurements of independent tibiotalar and subtalar joint motion. In this study, high-speed dual fluoroscopy images of ten asymptomatic adults were acquired during treadmill walking at 0.5 m/s and 1.0 m/s and a single-leg, balanced heel-rise. Three-dimensional (3D) CT models of each bone and dual fluoroscopy images were used to quantify in vivo kinematics for the tibiotalar and subtalar joints. Dynamic tibiotalar and subtalar mean joint angles often exhibited opposing trends during captured stance. During both speeds of walking, the tibiotalar joint had significantly greater dorsi/plantarflexion (D/P) angular ROM than the subtalar joint while the subtalar joint demonstrated greater inversion/eversion (In/Ev) and internal/external rotation (IR/ER) than the tibiotalar joint. During balanced heel-rise, only D/P and In/Ev were significantly different between the tibiotalar and subtalar joints. Translational ROM in the anterior/posterior (AP) direction was significantly greater in the subtalar than the tibiotalar joint during walking at 0.5 m/s. Overall, our results support the long-held belief that the tibiotalar joint is primarily responsible for D/P, while the subtalar joint facilitates In/Ev and IR/ER. However, the subtalar joint provided considerable D/P rotation, and the tibiotalar joint rotated about all three axes, which, along with translational motion, suggests that each joint undergoes complex, 3D motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27455417      PMCID: PMC4992948          DOI: 10.1115/1.4034263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  36 in total

1.  A comparison of overground and treadmill running for measuring the three-dimensional kinematics of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex.

Authors:  A G Schache; P D Blanch; D A Rath; T V Wrigley; R Starr; K L Bennell
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  ACTION OF THE SUBTALAR AND ANKLE-JOINT COMPLEX DURING THE STANCE PHASE OF WALKING.

Authors:  D G WRIGHT; S M DESAI; W H HENDERSON
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  The mechanics of the foot. I. The joints.

Authors:  J H HICKS
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1953-10       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Validation of a new model-based tracking technique for measuring three-dimensional, in vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics.

Authors:  Michael J Bey; Roger Zauel; Stephanie K Brock; Scott Tashman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Disability of the hindfoot after fracture of the tibial shaft.

Authors:  M McMaster
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1976-02

6.  Kinesiology and mechanical anatomy of the tarsal joints.

Authors:  P W Lapidus
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1963       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Biomechanics of the foot and ankle.

Authors:  J M Morris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1977 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Cartilage degeneration in different human joints.

Authors:  K E Kuettner; A A Cole
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  In vivo kinematics of the tibiotalar joint after lateral ankle instability.

Authors:  Adam M Caputo; Jun Y Lee; Chuck E Spritzer; Mark E Easley; James K DeOrio; James A Nunley; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  The three-dimensional kinematics and flexibility characteristics of the human ankle and subtalar joints--Part I: Kinematics.

Authors:  S Siegler; J Chen; C D Schneck
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.097

View more
  13 in total

1.  Subject-Specific Axes of Rotation Based on Talar Morphology Do Not Improve Predictions of Tibiotalar and Subtalar Joint Kinematics.

Authors:  Jennifer A Nichols; Koren E Roach; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of the talus: implication for variations in kinematics of the subtalar joint.

Authors:  Shuhei Nozaki; Kota Watanabe; Masaki Katayose
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Soft tissue artifact causes underestimation of hip joint kinematics and kinetics in a rigid-body musculoskeletal model.

Authors:  Niccolo M Fiorentino; Penny R Atkins; Michael J Kutschke; K Bo Foreman; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Application of High-Speed Dual Fluoroscopy to Study In Vivo Tibiotalar and Subtalar Kinematics in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability and Asymptomatic Control Subjects During Dynamic Activities.

Authors:  Koren E Roach; K Bo Foreman; Alexej Barg; Charles L Saltzman; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.827

5.  Predicting tibiotalar and subtalar joint angles from skin-marker data with dual-fluoroscopy as a reference standard.

Authors:  Jennifer A Nichols; Koren E Roach; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Compensatory Motion of the Subtalar Joint Following Tibiotalar Arthrodesis: An in Vivo Dual-Fluoroscopy Imaging Study.

Authors:  Amy L Lenz; Jennifer A Nichols; Koren E Roach; K Bo Foreman; Alexej Barg; Charles L Saltzman; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 6.558

7.  The modified Shriners Hospitals for Children Greenville (mSHCG) multi-segment foot model provides clinically acceptable measurements of ankle and midfoot angles: A dual fluoroscopy study.

Authors:  Koren E Roach; K Bo Foreman; Bruce A MacWilliams; Konstantinos Karpos; Jennifer Nichols; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Healthy ankle and hindfoot kinematics during gait: Sex differences, asymmetry and coupled motion revealed through dynamic biplane radiography.

Authors:  Shumeng Yang; Stephen P Canton; MaCalus V Hogan; William Anderst
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Methodology for Measurement of in vivo Tibiotalar Kinematics After Total Ankle Replacement Using Dual Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Dylan J Blair; Alexej Barg; K Bo Foreman; Andrew E Anderson; Amy L Lenz
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-05-05

10.  In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Penny R Atkins; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 1.424

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.