Literature DB >> 11535348

A comparison of overground and treadmill running for measuring the three-dimensional kinematics of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex.

A G Schache1, P D Blanch, D A Rath, T V Wrigley, R Starr, K L Bennell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare overground and treadmill running for differences in the three-dimensional angular kinematics of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex.
DESIGN: A within-subject repeated measures design.
BACKGROUND: The treadmill is an attractive research instrument as speed and slope are easily controlled and the required calibration volume is reduced. However, the degree to which treadmill running simulates overground running has not been resolved in the literature to date.
METHODS: 10 able-bodied subjects ran overground and on a treadmill at a self-selected speed. The treadmill speed was matched to each subjects respective average overground speed. The time-distance and the three-dimensional angular kinematic data were captured using a passive marker based motion analysis system. A set of angular and temporal kinematic parameters were extracted from the data and subjected to statistical analyses.
RESULTS: Significant differences were found between overground and treadmill running for all the time-distance parameters. Despite this, the kinematics of the lumbar spine and pelvis were similar between the two running conditions, with only three parameters being significantly different. These were lumbar extension at initial contact, anterior pelvic tilt at initial contact and the first maximum anterior pelvic tilt. Hip flexion-extension parameters were also only found to display subtle differences. Of the 17 hip parameters analysed, only hip flexion at initial contact, maximum hip flexion at loading response, hip extension at toe off, maximum hip extension and hip flexion-extension range of motion were found to be significantly different.
CONCLUSION: A high powered treadmill with a minimal belt speed fluctuation is capable of being used to obtain a representation of the typical three-dimensional kinematic pattern of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex during running. RELEVANCE: In order for the treadmill to be accepted as a useful research and/or clinical assessment instrument, it must be demonstrated that it does not significantly alter the performance of the evaluated activity. In this respect, a treadmill with minimal intra-stride belt speed variability and similar surface stiffness to the relevant overground condition is likely to be capable of being used to obtain a representation of the typical human running action for well accommodated subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11535348     DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(01)00061-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  26 in total

1.  Local anaesthetics use does not suppress muscle activity following an ankle injection.

Authors:  David A Stone; John P Abt; Anthony J House; Jonathan S Akins; Jonathan J Pederson; Karen A Keenan; Scott M Lephart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Sprint running performance: comparison between treadmill and field conditions.

Authors:  Jean-Benoît Morin; Pierrick Sève
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Isometric gluteus medius muscle torque and frontal plane pelvic motion during running.

Authors:  Evie N Burnet; Peter E Pidcoe
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Comparison of methods for kinematic identification of footstrike and toe-off during overground and treadmill running.

Authors:  Rebecca E Fellin; William C Rose; Todd D Royer; Irene S Davis
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 4.319

5.  Comparison of lower extremity kinematic curves during overground and treadmill running.

Authors:  Rebecca E Fellin; Kurt Manal; Irene S Davis
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.833

6.  In Vivo Kinematics of the Tibiotalar and Subtalar Joints in Asymptomatic Subjects: A High-Speed Dual Fluoroscopy Study.

Authors:  Koren E Roach; Bibo Wang; Ashley L Kapron; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Charles L Saltzman; K Bo Foreman; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  ACCURACY OF SELF-REPORTED FOOT STRIKE PATTERN IN INTERCOLLEGIATE AND RECREATIONAL RUNNERS DURING SHOD RUNNING.

Authors:  Michael B Bade; Katie Aaron; Thomas G McPoil
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-06

8.  Effects of chronic low back pain on trunk coordination and back muscle activity during walking: changes in motor control.

Authors:  Claudine J C Lamoth; Onno G Meijer; Andreas Daffertshofer; Paul I J M Wuisman; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Gait re-training to alleviate the symptoms of anterior exertional lower leg pain: a case series.

Authors:  David T Breen; John Foster; Eanna Falvey; Andrew Franklyn-Miller
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-02

10.  Sagittal lumbar spine position during standing, walking, and running at various gradients.

Authors:  David Levine; Marisa A Colston; Michael W Whittle; Elizabeth C Pharo; Denis J Marcellin-Little
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.