Literature DB >> 32079879

Compensatory Motion of the Subtalar Joint Following Tibiotalar Arthrodesis: An in Vivo Dual-Fluoroscopy Imaging Study.

Amy L Lenz1, Jennifer A Nichols1,2, Koren E Roach1,3, K Bo Foreman1, Alexej Barg1, Charles L Saltzman1, Andrew E Anderson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tibiotalar arthrodesis is a common treatment for end-stage tibiotalar osteoarthritis, and is associated with a long-term risk of concomitant subtalar osteoarthritis. It has been clinically hypothesized that subtalar osteoarthritis following tibiotalar arthrodesis is the product of compensatory subtalar joint hypermobility. However, in vivo measurements of subtalar joint motion following tibiotalar arthrodesis have not been quantified. Using dual-fluoroscopy motion capture, we tested the hypothesis that the subtalar joint of the limb with a tibiotalar arthrodesis would demonstrate differences in kinematics and increased range of motion compared with the subtalar joint of the contralateral, asymptomatic, untreated ankle.
METHODS: Ten asymptomatic patients who had undergone unilateral tibiotalar arthrodesis at a mean (and standard deviation) of 4.0 ± 1.8 years previously were evaluated during overground walking and a double heel-rise task. The evaluation involved markerless tracking with use of dual fluoroscopy integrated with 3-dimensional computed tomography, which allowed for dynamic measurements of subtalar and tibiotalar dorsiflexion-plantar flexion, inversion-eversion, and internal-external rotation. Range of motion, stance time, swing time, step length, and step width were also measured.
RESULTS: During the early stance phase of walking, the subtalar joint of the limb that had been treated with arthrodesis was plantar flexed (-4.7° ± 3.3°), whereas the subtalar joint of the untreated limb was dorsiflexed (4.6° ± 2.2°). Also, during the early stance phase of walking, eversion of the subtalar joint of the surgically treated limb (0.2° ± 2.3°) was less than that of the untreated limb (4.5° ± 3.2°). During double heel-rise, the treated limb exhibited increased peak subtalar plantar flexion (-7.1° ± 4.1°) compared with the untreated limb (0.2° ± 1.8°).
CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase in subtalar joint plantar flexion was found to be a primary compensation during overground walking and a double heel-rise activity following tibiotalar arthrodesis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Significant subtalar joint plantar flexion compensations appear to occur following tibiotalar arthrodesis. We found an increase in subtalar plantar flexion and considered the potential relationship of this finding with the increased rate of subtalar osteoarthritis that occurs following ankle arthrodesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32079879      PMCID: PMC7289138          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   6.558


  51 in total

1.  Kinematic changes after fusion and total replacement of the ankle: part 3: Talar movement.

Authors:  Victor Valderrabano; Beat Hintermann; Benno M Nigg; Darren Stefanyshyn; Pro Stergiou
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.827

2.  Multisegment Foot Kinematic and Kinetic Compensations in Level and Uphill Walking Following Tibiotalar Arthrodesis.

Authors:  Dustin A Bruening; Timothy E Cooney; Matthew S Ray; Gregory A Daut; Kevin M Cooney; Stephanie M Galey
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 2.827

3.  Revision tibiotalar arthrodesis.

Authors:  Mark E Easley; Harvey E Montijo; Joseph B Wilson; Robert D Fitch; James A Nunley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis.

Authors:  L M Coester; C L Saltzman; J Leupold; W Pontarelli
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Gait analysis and functional outcomes following ankle arthrodesis for isolated ankle arthritis.

Authors:  Rhys Thomas; Tim R Daniels; Kim Parker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis: a comparative analysis of arc of movement and functional outcomes.

Authors:  D I Pedowitz; J M Kane; G M Smith; H L Saffel; C Comer; S M Raikin
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Comparable energy expenditure after arthrodesis of the hip and ankle.

Authors:  R L Waters; G Barnes; T Husserl; L Silver; R Liss
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Ankle arthrodesis vs TTC arthrodesis: patient outcomes, satisfaction, and return to activity.

Authors:  Adam Ajis; Ken-Jin Tan; Mark S Myerson
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 2.827

9.  Region-of-interest analyses of one-dimensional biomechanical trajectories: bridging 0D and 1D theory, augmenting statistical power.

Authors:  Todd C Pataky; Mark A Robinson; Jos Vanrenterghem
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Statistical Parametric Mapping to Identify Differences between Consensus-Based Joint Patterns during Gait in Children with Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Angela Nieuwenhuys; Eirini Papageorgiou; Kaat Desloovere; Guy Molenaers; Tinne De Laet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Gait Characteristics in Youth With Transverse Myelitis.

Authors:  Miriam Hwang; Ann Flanagan; Adam Graf; Karen M Kruger; Nancy Scullion; Samantha Tayne; Haluk Altiok
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2021-08-13

Review 2.  Summary Report of the Arthritis Foundation and the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society's Symposium on Targets for Osteoarthritis Research: Part 2: Treatment Options.

Authors:  Jason S Kim; Annunziato Amendola; Alexej Barg; Judith Baumhauer; James W Brodsky; Daniel M Cushman; Tyler A Gonzalez; Dennis Janisse; Michael J Jurynec; J Lawrence Marsh; Carolyn M Sofka; Thomas O Clanton; Donald D Anderson
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2022-10-14

3.  Healthy ankle and hindfoot kinematics during gait: Sex differences, asymmetry and coupled motion revealed through dynamic biplane radiography.

Authors:  Shumeng Yang; Stephen P Canton; MaCalus V Hogan; William Anderst
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Penny R Atkins; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 1.424

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.