Literature DB >> 16813452

Validation of a new model-based tracking technique for measuring three-dimensional, in vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics.

Michael J Bey1, Roger Zauel, Stephanie K Brock, Scott Tashman.   

Abstract

Shoulder motion is complex and significant research efforts have focused on measuring glenohumeral joint motion. Unfortunately, conventional motion measurement techniques are unable to measure glenohumeral joint kinematics during dynamic shoulder motion to clinically significant levels of accuracy. The purpose of this study was to validate the accuracy of a new model-based tracking technique for measuring three-dimensional, in vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics. We have developed a model-based tracking technique for accurately measuring in vivo joint motion from biplane radiographic images that tracks the position of bones based on their three-dimensional shape and texture. To validate this technique, we implanted tantalum beads into the humerus and scapula of both shoulders from three cadaver specimens and then recorded biplane radiographic images of the shoulder while manually moving each specimen's arm. The position of the humerus and scapula were measured using the model-based tracking system and with a previously validated dynamic radiostereometric analysis (RSA) technique. Accuracy was reported in terms of measurement bias, measurement precision, and overall dynamic accuracy by comparing the model-based tracking results to the dynamic RSA results. The model-based tracking technique produced results that were in excellent agreement with the RSA technique. Measurement bias ranged from -0.126 to 0.199 mm for the scapula and ranged from -0.022 to 0.079 mm for the humerus. Dynamic measurement precision was better than 0.130 mm for the scapula and 0.095 mm for the humerus. Overall dynamic accuracy indicated that rms errors in any one direction were less than 0.385 mm for the scapula and less than 0.374 mm for the humerus. These errors correspond to rotational inaccuracies of approximately 0.25 deg for the scapula and 0.47 deg for the humerus. This new model-based tracking approach represents a non-invasive technique for accurately measuring dynamic glenohumeral joint motion under in vivo conditions. The model-based technique achieves accuracy levels that far surpass all previously reported non-invasive techniques for measuring in vivo glenohumeral joint motion. This technique is supported by a rigorous validation study that provides a realistic simulation of in vivo conditions and we fully expect to achieve these levels of accuracy with in vivo human testing. Future research will use this technique to analyze shoulder motion under a variety of testing conditions and to investigate the effects of conservative and surgical treatment of rotator cuff tears on dynamic joint stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16813452      PMCID: PMC3072582          DOI: 10.1115/1.2206199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  62 in total

1.  "In vivo" pose estimation of artificial knee implants using computer vision.

Authors:  S A Walker; W Hoff; R Komistek; D Dennis
Journal:  Biomed Sci Instrum       Date:  1996

2.  Translation of the glenohumeral joint with the patient under anesthesia.

Authors:  R J Hawkins; J P Schutte; D H Janda; G H Huckell
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of baseball pitching in acceleration phase.

Authors:  Y T Wang; H T Ford; H T Ford; D M Shin
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1995-02

4.  Kinetics of baseball pitching with implications about injury mechanisms.

Authors:  G S Fleisig; J R Andrews; C J Dillman; R F Escamilla
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  A dynamic shoulder model: reliability testing and muscle force study.

Authors:  N Wuelker; C J Wirth; W Plitz; B Roetman
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Kinematic magnetic resonance imaging of the normal shoulder: assessment of the labrum and capsule.

Authors:  E Cardinal; K A Buckwalter; E M Braunstein
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.248

7.  A new dynamic testing apparatus to study glenohumeral joint motion.

Authors:  R E Debski; P J McMahon; W O Thompson; S L Woo; J J Warner; F H Fu
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The rotator cuff opposes superior translation of the humeral head.

Authors:  N A Sharkey; R A Marder
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Translation of the glenohumeral joint with simulated active elevation.

Authors:  N Wuelker; H Schmotzer; K Thren; M Korell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Radiologic measurement of superior displacement of the humeral head in the impingement syndrome.

Authors:  A Deutsch; D W Altchek; E Schwartz; J C Otis; R F Warren
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  95 in total

1.  Dynamic CT technique for assessment of wrist joint instabilities.

Authors:  Shuai Leng; Kristin Zhao; Mingliang Qu; Kai-Nan An; Richard Berger; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Measuring Three-Dimensional Thorax Motion Via Biplane Radiographic Imaging: Technique and Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Timothy G Baumer; Joshua W Giles; Anne Drake; Roger Zauel; Michael J Bey
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Quantifying cross-scatter contamination in biplane fluoroscopy motion analysis systems.

Authors:  Janelle A Cross; Ben McHenry; Taly Gilat Schmidt
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-10-23

4.  Subject-Specific Axes of Rotation Based on Talar Morphology Do Not Improve Predictions of Tibiotalar and Subtalar Joint Kinematics.

Authors:  Jennifer A Nichols; Koren E Roach; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Measuring dynamic in-vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics: technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  Michael J Bey; Stephanie K Kline; Roger Zauel; Terrence R Lock; Patricia A Kolowich
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Accuracy and feasibility of dual fluoroscopy and model-based tracking to quantify in vivo hip kinematics during clinical exams.

Authors:  Ashley L Kapron; Stephen K Aoki; Christopher L Peters; Steve A Maas; Michael J Bey; Roger Zauel; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 1.833

7.  Exercise therapy for treatment of supraspinatus tears does not alter glenohumeral kinematics during internal/external rotation with the arm at the side.

Authors:  Gerald A Ferrer; R Matthew Miller; Jason P Zlotnicki; Scott Tashman; James J Irrgang; Volker Musahl; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Continuous cervical spine kinematics during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.

Authors:  William J Anderst; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; James D Kang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  In-vivo quantification of dynamic hip joint center errors and soft tissue artifact.

Authors:  Niccolo M Fiorentino; Penny R Atkins; Michael J Kutschke; K Bo Foreman; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Motion path of the instant center of rotation in the cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension: implications for artificial disc design and evaluation of motion quality after arthrodesis.

Authors:  William Anderst; Emma Baillargeon; William Donaldson; Joon Lee; James Kang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.