Literature DB >> 27442766

When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men's aggressive responses to low situational power.

Nickola C Overall1, Matthew D Hammond1, James K McNulty2, Eli J Finkel3.   

Abstract

When does power in intimate relationships shape important interpersonal behaviors, such as psychological aggression? Five studies tested whether possessing low relationship power was associated with aggressive responses, but (a) only within power-relevant relationship interactions when situational power was low, and (b) only by men because masculinity (but not femininity) involves the possession and demonstration of power. In Studies 1 and 2, men lower in relationship power exhibited greater aggressive communication during couples' observed conflict discussions, but only when they experienced low situational power because they were unable to influence their partner. In Study 3, men lower in relationship power reported greater daily aggressive responses toward their partner, but only on days when they experienced low situational power because they were either (a) unable to influence their partner or (b) dependent on their partner for support. In Study 4, men who possessed lower relationship power exhibited greater aggressive responses during couples' support-relevant discussions, but only when they had low situational power because they needed high levels of support. Study 5 provided evidence for the theoretical mechanism underlying men's aggressive responses to low relationship power. Men who possessed lower relationship power felt less manly on days they faced low situational power because their partner was unwilling to change to resolve relationship problems, which in turn predicted greater aggressive behavior toward their partner. These results demonstrate that fully understanding when and why power is associated with interpersonal behavior requires differentiating between relationship and situational power. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27442766      PMCID: PMC5069702          DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  76 in total

1.  Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships.

Authors:  J Wieselquist; C E Rusbult; C A Foster; C R Agnew
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-11

Review 2.  Violence in lesbian and gay relationships: theory, prevalence, and correlational factors.

Authors:  L K Burke; D R Follingstad
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  1999-08

3.  Working models of attachment shape perceptions of social support: evidence from experimental and observational studies.

Authors:  Nancy L Collins; Brooke C Feeney
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2004-09

4.  Having the power to forgive: when the experience of power increases interpersonal forgiveness.

Authors:  Johan C Karremans; Pamela K Smith
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-08

5.  Regulating partners in intimate relationships: the costs and benefits of different communication strategies.

Authors:  Nickola C Overall; Garth J O Fletcher; Jeffry A Simpson; Chris G Sibley
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-03

6.  The good life of the powerful: the experience of power and authenticity enhances subjective well-being.

Authors:  Yona Kifer; Daniel Heller; Wei Qi Elaine Perunovic; Adam D Galinsky
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-01-15

7.  Developmental and dyadic perspectives on commitment in adult romantic relationships.

Authors:  M Minda Oriña; W Andrew Collins; Jeffry A Simpson; Jessica E Salvatore; Katherine C Haydon; John S Kim
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-05-26

8.  Using I³ theory to clarify when dispositional aggressiveness predicts intimate partner violence perpetration.

Authors:  Eli J Finkel; C Nathan DeWall; Erica B Slotter; James K McNulty; Richard S Pond; David C Atkins
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-10-03

9.  Dependency characteristics of partner assaultive men.

Authors:  C M Murphy; S L Meyer; K D O'Leary
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1994-11

10.  Social status moderates the relationship between facial structure and aggression.

Authors:  Stefan M M Goetz; Kraig S Shattuck; Robert M Miller; Jocelyn A Campbell; Elianna Lozoya; Glenn E Weisfeld; Justin M Carré
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-09-25
View more
  3 in total

1.  Is Low Power Associated with Submission During Marital Conflict? Moderating Roles of Gender and Traditional Gender Role Beliefs.

Authors:  Paula R Pietromonaco; Nickola C Overall; Lindsey A Beck; Sally I Powers
Journal:  Soc Psychol Personal Sci       Date:  2020-04-09

2.  The Dynamics of Intimate Relationships and Contraceptive Use During Early Emerging Adulthood.

Authors:  Yasamin Kusunoki; Jennifer S Barber
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2020-12

3.  The Anxiety Depression Pathway Among Men Following a Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Cross-Sectional Interactions Between Anger Responses and Loneliness.

Authors:  Simon M Rice; David Kealy; John S Ogrodniczuk; Zac E Seidler; Gabriela Montaner; Suzanne Chambers; John L Oliffe
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2021 May-Jun
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.