Literature DB >> 19254108

Regulating partners in intimate relationships: the costs and benefits of different communication strategies.

Nickola C Overall1, Garth J O Fletcher, Jeffry A Simpson, Chris G Sibley.   

Abstract

This study tested the success of communication strategies used by relationship partners (N = 61 romantic couples) who were videotaped while trying to produce desired changes in each other. Strategies varying in valence (positive vs. negative) and directness (direct vs. indirect) were differentially associated with postdiscussion perceptions of success as well as ratings of demonstrated change in targeted features gathered at 3-month intervals during the following year. Direct strategies (positive and negative) were initially perceived as relatively unsuccessful but predicted increased change over the next 12 months as reported by the targeted partners and (for positive-direct strategies) as perceived by female agents. Positive-indirect strategies, in contrast, were associated with higher concurrent perceived success but did not predict later change. Increases in problem severity also forecasted lower relationship quality over time. These findings indicate that one mechanism through which regulation strategies impact relationship outcomes is the extent to which engaged strategies are successful at producing desired change.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19254108     DOI: 10.1037/a0012961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  17 in total

1.  Communication moderates effects of residential mobility on relationship quality among ethnically diverse couples.

Authors:  Teresa P Nguyen; Hannah C Williamson; Benjamin R Karney; Thomas N Bradbury
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2017-04-13

2.  Self-compassion and relationship maintenance: the moderating roles of conscientiousness and gender.

Authors:  Levi R Baker; James K McNulty
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-05

3.  Research on Marital Satisfaction and Stability in the 2010s: Challenging Conventional Wisdom.

Authors:  Benjamin R Karney; Thomas N Bradbury
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2020-01-05

4.  Expectations for future relationship satisfaction: Unique sources and critical implications for commitment.

Authors:  Levi R Baker; James K McNulty; Laura E VanderDrift
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2017-04-03

5.  The dark side of forgiveness: the tendency to forgive predicts continued psychological and physical aggression in marriage.

Authors:  James K McNulty
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2011-06

Review 6.  The disclosure processes model: understanding disclosure decision making and postdisclosure outcomes among people living with a concealable stigmatized identity.

Authors:  Stephenie R Chaudoir; Jeffrey D Fisher
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Positively biased appraisals in everyday life: when do they benefit mental health and when do they harm it?

Authors:  Erin M O'Mara; James K McNulty; Benjamin R Karney
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-09

8.  When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men's aggressive responses to low situational power.

Authors:  Nickola C Overall; Matthew D Hammond; James K McNulty; Eli J Finkel
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2016-08

9.  Daily interpersonal coping strategies: Implications for self-reported well-being and cortisol.

Authors:  Kira S Birditt; Michael R Nevitt; David M Almeida
Journal:  J Soc Pers Relat       Date:  2015-08

10.  Social support and weight maintenance in marriage: the interactive effects of support seeking, support provision, and gender.

Authors:  Andrea L Meltzer; James K McNulty; Benjamin R Karney
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2012-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.