Literature DB >> 10573874

Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships.

J Wieselquist1, C E Rusbult, C A Foster, C R Agnew.   

Abstract

The present work advances and tests an interdependence-based model of the associations among commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust. Findings from two longitudinal studies revealed good support for model predictions. Commitment-inspired acts such as accommodation and willingness to sacrifice provide diagnostic information regarding a partner's pro-relationship motives. Individuals come to trust their partners when they perceive that their partners have enacted pro-relationship behaviors, departing from their direct self-interest for the good of the relationship. The results of mediation analyses are consistent with a model of mutual cyclical growth in which (a) dependence promotes strong commitment, (b) commitment promotes pro-relationship acts, (c) pro-relationship acts are perceived by the partner, (d) the perception of pro-relationship acts enhances the partner's trust, and (e) trust increases the partner's willingness to become dependent on the relationship. Auxiliary analyses revealed that self-reported attachment style does not account for substantial variance beyond the features of interdependence that form the basis for the present model.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10573874     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.77.5.942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  33 in total

1.  Breaking up is hard to do: the impact of unmarried relationship dissolution on mental health and life satisfaction.

Authors:  Galena K Rhoades; Claire M Kamp Dush; David C Atkins; Scott M Stanley; Howard J Markman
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2011-06

2.  Personal wilderness relationships: building on a transactional approach.

Authors:  Robert G Dvorak; William T Borrie; Alan E Watson
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Transformative processes in marriage: An analysis of emerging trends.

Authors:  Frank D Fincham; Scott M Stanley; Steven R H Beach
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2007-05-01

4.  Developmental and dyadic perspectives on commitment in adult romantic relationships.

Authors:  M Minda Oriña; W Andrew Collins; Jeffry A Simpson; Jessica E Salvatore; Katherine C Haydon; John S Kim
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-05-26

5.  The Look that Binds: Partner-Directed Altruistic Motivation and Biased Perception in Married Couples.

Authors:  Raluca Petrican; Alexander Todorov; Christopher T Burris; R Shayna Rosenbaum; Cheryl Grady
Journal:  J Nonverbal Behav       Date:  2015-06-01

6.  Signaling when (and when not) to be cautious and self-protective: impulsive and reflective trust in close relationships.

Authors:  Sandra L Murray; Rebecca T Pinkus; John G Holmes; Brianna Harris; Sarah Gomillion; Maya Aloni; Jaye L Derrick; Sadie Leder
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-09

7.  Relational underpinnings of condom use: Findings from the project on partner dynamics.

Authors:  Christopher R Agnew; S Marie Harvey; Laura E VanderDrift; Jocelyn Warren
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  PRAYER AND MARITAL INTERVENTION: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK.

Authors:  Steven R H Beach; Frank D Fincham; Tera R Hurt; Lily M McNair; Scott M Stanley
Journal:  J Soc Clin Psychol       Date:  2008-09-01

9.  Mediators of the link between autistic traits and relationship satisfaction in a non-clinical sample.

Authors:  Monique M H Pollmann; Catrin Finkenauer; Sander Begeer
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2010-04

10.  When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men's aggressive responses to low situational power.

Authors:  Nickola C Overall; Matthew D Hammond; James K McNulty; Eli J Finkel
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.