Literature DB >> 24068116

Social status moderates the relationship between facial structure and aggression.

Stefan M M Goetz1, Kraig S Shattuck, Robert M Miller, Jocelyn A Campbell, Elianna Lozoya, Glenn E Weisfeld, Justin M Carré.   

Abstract

A growing body of evidence has linked individual differences in facial structure-in particular, the facial width-to-height ratio (FWHR)-to social behaviors, including aggression, cheating, and nonreciprocation of trust. In the research reported here, we extended this work by demonstrating that the association between FWHR and aggression is moderated by subjective and objective measures of social status. In Study 1 (N = 237 college students), FWHR was positively correlated with aggressive behavior, but only among men reporting relatively low social status. In Study 2 (N = 891 professional hockey players), FWHR was positively correlated with penalty minutes, but only among players who earned relatively low salaries. Collectively, these studies provide compelling evidence for the role of social status in moderating the relationship between facial structure and aggression, indicating that FWHR is a robust predictor of aggressive behavior, but only in the context of relatively low social status.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aggressive behavior; facial features; social behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24068116     DOI: 10.1177/0956797613493294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  12 in total

1.  Facial width-to-height ratio predicts self-reported dominance and aggression in males and females, but a measure of masculinity does not.

Authors:  Carmen E Lefevre; Peter J Etchells; Emma C Howell; Andrew P Clark; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Facial width-to-height ratio is associated with agonistic and affiliative dominance in bonobos (Pan paniscus).

Authors:  J S Martin; N Staes; A Weiss; J M G Stevens; A V Jaeggi
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men's aggressive responses to low situational power.

Authors:  Nickola C Overall; Matthew D Hammond; James K McNulty; Eli J Finkel
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2016-08

4.  Face Shape and Behavior: Implications of Similarities in Infants and Adults.

Authors:  Leslie A Zebrowitz; Robert G Franklin; Jasmine Boshyan
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2015-11-01

Review 5.  Evidence from Meta-Analyses of the Facial Width-to-Height Ratio as an Evolved Cue of Threat.

Authors:  Shawn N Geniole; Thomas F Denson; Barnaby J Dixson; Justin M Carré; Cheryl M McCormick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Men's facial width-to-height ratio predicts aggression: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael P Haselhuhn; Margaret E Ormiston; Elaine M Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Facial width-to-height ratio relates to dominance style in the genus Macaca.

Authors:  Marta Borgi; Bonaventura Majolo
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  The influence of income and testosterone on the validity of facial width-to-height ratio as a biomarker for dominance.

Authors:  Emilou Noser; Jessica Schoch; Ulrike Ehlert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Social status, facial structure, and assertiveness in brown capuchin monkeys.

Authors:  Justin M Carré
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-11

10.  Are Rich People Perceived as More Trustworthy? Perceived Socioeconomic Status Modulates Judgments of Trustworthiness and Trust Behavior Based on Facial Appearance.

Authors:  Yue Qi; Qi Li; Feng Du
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.