Literature DB >> 27440730

Landscape genomics reveals altered genome wide diversity within revegetated stands of Eucalyptus microcarpa (Grey Box).

Rebecca Jordan1,2, Shannon K Dillon3, Suzanne M Prober2, Ary A Hoffmann1.   

Abstract

In order to contribute to evolutionary resilience and adaptive potential in highly modified landscapes, revegetated areas should ideally reflect levels of genetic diversity within and across natural stands. Landscape genomic analyses enable such diversity patterns to be characterized at genome and chromosomal levels. Landscape-wide patterns of genomic diversity were assessed in Eucalyptus microcarpa, a dominant tree species widely used in revegetation in Southeastern Australia. Trees from small and large patches within large remnants, small isolated remnants and revegetation sites were assessed across the now highly fragmented distribution of this species using the DArTseq genomic approach. Genomic diversity was similar within all three types of remnant patches analysed, although often significantly but only slightly lower in revegetation sites compared with natural remnants. Differences in diversity between stand types varied across chromosomes. Genomic differentiation was higher between small, isolated remnants, and among revegetated sites compared with natural stands. We conclude that small remnants and revegetated sites of our E. microcarpa samples largely but not completely capture patterns in genomic diversity across the landscape. Genomic approaches provide a powerful tool for assessing restoration efforts across the landscape.
© 2016 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2016 New Phytologist Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eucalyptus; fragmentation; genetic diversity; genomics; restoration

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27440730     DOI: 10.1111/nph.14084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  6 in total

1.  How well do revegetation plantings capture genetic diversity?

Authors:  Rebecca Jordan; Martin F Breed; Suzanne M Prober; Adam D Miller; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  The potential of genomics for restoring ecosystems and biodiversity.

Authors:  Martin F Breed; Peter A Harrison; Colette Blyth; Margaret Byrne; Virginie Gaget; Nicholas J C Gellie; Scott V C Groom; Riley Hodgson; Jacob G Mills; Thomas A A Prowse; Dorothy A Steane; Jakki J Mohr
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Fine-scale species distribution modelling and genotyping by sequencing to examine hybridisation between two narrow endemic plant species.

Authors:  J W Ball; T P Robinson; G W Wardell-Johnson; J Bovill; M Byrne; P G Nevill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Landscape drivers of genomic diversity and divergence in woodland Eucalyptus.

Authors:  Kevin D Murray; Jasmine K Janes; Ashley Jones; Helen M Bothwell; Rose L Andrew; Justin O Borevitz
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2019-11-17       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 5.  Tapping Diversity From the Wild: From Sampling to Implementation.

Authors:  Sariel Hübner; Michael B Kantar
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Divergent lineages in a semi-arid mallee species, Eucalyptus behriana, correspond to a major geographic break in southeastern Australia.

Authors:  Patrick S Fahey; Rachael M Fowler; Todd G B McLay; Frank Udovicic; David J Cantrill; Michael J Bayly
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.