Literature DB >> 33437459

Divergent lineages in a semi-arid mallee species, Eucalyptus behriana, correspond to a major geographic break in southeastern Australia.

Patrick S Fahey1, Rachael M Fowler1, Todd G B McLay1,2, Frank Udovicic2, David J Cantrill2, Michael J Bayly1.   

Abstract

AIM: To infer relationships between populations of the semi-arid, mallee eucalypt, Eucalyptus behriana, to build hypotheses regarding evolution of major disjunctions in the species' distribution and to expand understanding of the biogeographical history of southeastern Australia. LOCATION: Southeastern Australia. TAXON: Eucalyptus behriana (Myrtaceae, Angiospermae).
METHODS: We developed a large dataset of anonymous genomic loci for 97 samples from 11 populations of E. behriana using double digest restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (ddRAD-seq), to determine genetic relationships between the populations. These relationships, along with species distribution models, were used to construct hypotheses regarding environmental processes that have driven fragmentation of the species' distribution.
RESULTS: Greatest genetic divergence was between populations on either side of the Lower Murray Basin. Populations west of the Basin showed greater genetic divergence between one another than the eastern populations. The most genetically distinct population in the east (Long Forest) was separated from others by the Great Dividing Range. A close relationship was found between the outlying northernmost population (near West Wyalong) and those in the Victorian Goldfields despite a large disjunction between them.
CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of genetic variation are consistent with a history of vicariant differentiation of disjunct populations. We infer that an early disjunction to develop in the species distribution was that across the Lower Murray Basin, an important biogeographical barrier separating many dry sclerophyll plant taxa in southeastern Australia. Additionally, our results suggest that the western populations fragmented earlier than the eastern ones. Fragmentation, both west and east of the Murray Basin, is likely tied to climatic changes associated with glacial-interglacial cycles although it remains possible that major geological events including uplift of the Mount Lofty Ranges and basalt flows in the Newer Volcanics Province also played a role.
© 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eucalyptus; climatic cycles; ddRAD‐seq; phylogeography; population fragmentation; species distribution model; vicariance

Year:  2020        PMID: 33437459      PMCID: PMC7790638          DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2045-7758            Impact factor:   2.912


  25 in total

Review 1.  Birth of a biome: insights into the assembly and maintenance of the Australian arid zone biota.

Authors:  M Byrne; D K Yeates; L Joseph; M Kearney; J Bowler; M A J Williams; S Cooper; S C Donnellan; J S Keogh; R Leys; J Melville; D J Murphy; N Porch; K-H Wyrwoll
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Habitat type and dispersal mode underlie the capacity for plant migration across an intermittent seaway.

Authors:  J R P Worth; B R Holland; N J Beeton; B Schönfeld; M Rossetto; R E Vaillancourt; G J Jordan
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Genomic diversity, population structure, and migration following rapid range expansion in the Balsam poplar, Populus balsamifera.

Authors:  Stephen R Keller; Matthew S Olson; Salim Silim; William Schroeder; Peter Tiffin
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Landscape genomics reveals altered genome wide diversity within revegetated stands of Eucalyptus microcarpa (Grey Box).

Authors:  Rebecca Jordan; Shannon K Dillon; Suzanne M Prober; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  A morphological cline in Eucalyptus: a genetic perspective.

Authors:  James E Holman; Jane M Hughes; Rod J Fensham
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  The variant call format and VCFtools.

Authors:  Petr Danecek; Adam Auton; Goncalo Abecasis; Cornelis A Albers; Eric Banks; Mark A DePristo; Robert E Handsaker; Gerton Lunter; Gabor T Marth; Stephen T Sherry; Gilean McVean; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Cost-effective, high-throughput DNA sequencing libraries for multiplexed target capture.

Authors:  Nadin Rohland; David Reich
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  The fate of the Arctic seaweed Fucus distichus under climate change: an ecological niche modeling approach.

Authors:  Alexander Jueterbock; Irina Smolina; James A Coyer; Galice Hoarau
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Multiple evolutionary processes drive the patterns of genetic differentiation in a forest tree species complex.

Authors:  Rebecca C Jones; Dorothy A Steane; Martyn Lavery; René E Vaillancourt; Brad M Potts
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Genome-wide variation in recombination rate in Eucalyptus.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Gion; Corey J Hudson; Isabelle Lesur; René E Vaillancourt; Brad M Potts; Jules S Freeman
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Biodiscoveries within the Australian plant genus Eremophila based on international and interdisciplinary collaboration: results and perspectives on outstanding ethical dilemmas.

Authors:  Susan J Semple; Dan Staerk; Bevan J Buirchell; Rachael M Fowler; Oliver Gericke; Louise Kjaerulff; Yong Zhao; Hans Albert Pedersen; Malene J Petersen; Line Fentz Rasmussen; Emilie Kold Bredahl; Gustav Blichfeldt Pedersen; Laura Mikél McNair; Chi P Ndi; Nikolaj Lervad Hansen; Allison M Heskes; Michael J Bayly; Claus J Loland; Nanna Heinz; Birger Lindberg Møller
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 7.091

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.