Literature DB >> 33584776

Tapping Diversity From the Wild: From Sampling to Implementation.

Sariel Hübner1, Michael B Kantar2.   

Abstract

The diversity observed among crop wild relatives (CWRs) and their ability to flourish in unfavorable and harsh environments have drawn the attention of plant scientists and breeders for many decades. However, it is also recognized that the benefit gained from using CWRs in breeding is a potential rose between thorns of detrimental genetic variation that is linked to the trait of interest. Despite the increased interest in CWRs, little attention was given so far to the statistical, analytical, and technical considerations that should guide the sampling design, the germplasm characterization, and later its implementation in breeding. Here, we review the entire process of sampling and identifying beneficial genetic variation in CWRs and the challenge of using it in breeding. The ability to detect beneficial genetic variation in CWRs is strongly affected by the sampling design which should be adjusted to the spatial and temporal variation of the target species, the trait of interest, and the analytical approach used. Moreover, linkage disequilibrium is a key factor that constrains the resolution of searching for beneficial alleles along the genome, and later, the ability to deplete linked deleterious genetic variation as a consequence of genetic drag. We also discuss how technological advances in genomics, phenomics, biotechnology, and data science can improve the ability to identify beneficial genetic variation in CWRs and to exploit it in strive for higher-yielding and sustainable crops.
Copyright © 2021 Hübner and Kantar.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breeding; crop wild relative; genetic drag; introgression; sampling design

Year:  2021        PMID: 33584776      PMCID: PMC7873362          DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.626565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Plant Sci        ISSN: 1664-462X            Impact factor:   5.753


  110 in total

1.  R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses.

Authors:  Karl W Broman; Hao Wu; Saunak Sen; Gary A Churchill
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  A map of local adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  A Fournier-Level; A Korte; M D Cooper; M Nordborg; J Schmitt; A M Wilczek
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Patterns and processes in crop domestication: an historical review and quantitative analysis of 203 global food crops.

Authors:  Rachel S Meyer; Ashley E DuVal; Helen R Jensen
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  Exome sequencing of geographically diverse barley landraces and wild relatives gives insights into environmental adaptation.

Authors:  Joanne Russell; Martin Mascher; Ian K Dawson; Stylianos Kyriakidis; Cristiane Calixto; Fabian Freund; Micha Bayer; Iain Milne; Tony Marshall-Griffiths; Shane Heinen; Anna Hofstad; Rajiv Sharma; Axel Himmelbach; Manuela Knauft; Maarten van Zonneveld; John W S Brown; Karl Schmid; Benjamin Kilian; Gary J Muehlbauer; Nils Stein; Robbie Waugh
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Sub1A is an ethylene-response-factor-like gene that confers submergence tolerance to rice.

Authors:  Kenong Xu; Xia Xu; Takeshi Fukao; Patrick Canlas; Reycel Maghirang-Rodriguez; Sigrid Heuer; Abdelbagi M Ismail; Julia Bailey-Serres; Pamela C Ronald; David J Mackill
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Landscape genomic analysis of candidate genes for climate adaptation in a California endemic oak, Quercus lobata.

Authors:  Victoria L Sork; Kevin Squire; Paul F Gugger; Stephanie E Steele; Eric D Levy; Andrew J Eckert
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.844

7.  Dissecting the Genetic Basis of Local Adaptation in Soybean.

Authors:  Nonoy B Bandillo; Justin E Anderson; Michael B Kantar; Robert M Stupar; James E Specht; George L Graef; Aaron J Lorenz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  LFMM 2: Fast and Accurate Inference of Gene-Environment Associations in Genome-Wide Studies.

Authors:  Kevin Caye; Basile Jumentier; Johanna Lepeule; Olivier François
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  The FIGS (focused identification of germplasm strategy) approach identifies traits related to drought adaptation in Vicia faba genetic resources.

Authors:  Hamid Khazaei; Kenneth Street; Abdallah Bari; Michael Mackay; Frederick L Stoddard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  ImaGene: a convolutional neural network to quantify natural selection from genomic data.

Authors:  Luis Torada; Lucrezia Lorenzon; Alice Beddis; Ulas Isildak; Linda Pattini; Sara Mathieson; Matteo Fumagalli
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Exploitation of epigenetic variation of crop wild relatives for crop improvement and agrobiodiversity preservation.

Authors:  Serena Varotto; Tamar Krugman; Riccardo Aiese Cigliano; Khalil Kashkush; Ankica Kondić-Špika; Fillipos A Aravanopoulos; Monica Pradillo; Federica Consiglio; Riccardo Aversano; Ales Pecinka; Dragana Miladinović
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Distribution of Biodiversity of Wild Beet Species (Genus Beta L.) in Armenia under Ongoing Climate Change Conditions.

Authors:  Anna Avetisyan; Tatevik Aloyan; Amalya Iskandaryan; Margarita Harutyunyan; Laura Jaakola; Andreas Melikyan
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-24

3.  Crop Improvement: Now and Beyond.

Authors:  Pierre Sourdille; Pierre Devaux
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-10

4.  Wild sunflower goes viral: Citizen science and comparative genomics allow tracking the origin and establishment of invasive sunflower in the Levant.

Authors:  Sariel Hübner; Dana Sisou; Tali Mandel; Marco Todesco; Maor Matzrafi; Hanan Eizenberg
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 6.622

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.