Literature DB >> 2741250

A survey of the acoustic output of commercial extracorporeal shock wave lithotripters.

A J Coleman1, J E Saunders.   

Abstract

A survey of the pressures and intensities generated by different commercial extracorporeal shock wave (ESWL) lithotripters is reported. The lithotripters included in the survey are the Dornier HM3, Wolf Piezolith 2200 and 2300, Siemens Lithostar, Technomed Sonolith 2000 and 3000, and EDAP LT-01. Measurements were made using a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVdF) membrane hydrophone in water. The zero crossing frequency of one complete cycle of the focused pulse from ESWL equipment is in the range 0.1 to 1 MHz. Spatial-peak temporal-peak positive and negative pressures up to 114 MPa and 10 MPa, respectively, have been measured and the rise times of the positive pressure half cycle at maximum output settings are 30 ns or less. The mean spatial-peak temporal-average intensity of the lithotripters is 5.0 x 10(2) W m-2 when operated at a pulse repetition frequency of 1 Hz. The spatial-peak pulse-average intensity ranges from 6.6 x 10(7) to 1.24 x 10(9) W m-2. The estimated acoustic energy in a single pulse (at the focus) at the maximum output setting of the lithotripters varies from 2.0 x 10(-3) J to about 9.0 x 10(-2) J. The beam area in the focal plane varies by a factor of 100 on different lithotripters and the temporal-peak pressure at the position of the skin at the entry point of the beam by a factor of 30. Measurement problems associated with hydrophone damage and the uncertainties in the hydrophone calibration at high pressures are discussed and an estimate of the total uncertainty in the absolute measurements of the spatial-peak temporal-peak positive pressure is given as +/- 36%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2741250     DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(89)90066-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  32 in total

1.  Cytoplasmic molecular delivery with shock waves: importance of impulse.

Authors:  T Kodama; M R Hamblin; A G Doukas
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Impact of voltage and capacity on the electrical and acoustic output of intracorporeal electrohydraulic lithotripsy.

Authors:  R Vorreuther; R Engelking
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1992

3.  A comparison of light spot hydrophone and fiber optic probe hydrophone for lithotripter field characterization.

Authors:  N Smith; G N Sankin; W N Simmons; R Nanke; J Fehre; P Zhong
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.523

4.  Effect of lithotripter focal width on stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jun Qin; W Neal Simmons; Georgy Sankin; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Extracorporeal shock wave therapy mechanisms in musculoskeletal regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Claudio Lopes Simplicio; Joseph Purita; William Murrell; Gabriel Silva Santos; Rafael Gonzales Dos Santos; José Fábio Santos Duarte Lana
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-02-12

6.  The effect of reflector geometry on the acoustic field and bubble dynamics produced by an electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripter.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhou; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Detection of significant variation in acoustic output of an electromagnetic lithotriptor.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James A McAteer; R Jason Vonderhaar; Irina V Pishchalnikova; James C Williams; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Acoustic field characterization of the Duolith: measurements and modeling of a clinical shock wave therapy device.

Authors:  Camilo Perez; Hong Chen; Thomas J Matula; Maria Karzova; Vera A Khokhlova
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Experimental basis of shockwave-induced renal trauma in the model of the canine kidney.

Authors:  J Rassweiler; K U Köhrmann; W Back; S Fröhner; M Raab; A Weber; F Kahmann; E Marlinghaus; K P Jünemann; P Alken
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.