Literature DB >> 8490667

Experimental basis of shockwave-induced renal trauma in the model of the canine kidney.

J Rassweiler1, K U Köhrmann, W Back, S Fröhner, M Raab, A Weber, F Kahmann, E Marlinghaus, K P Jünemann, P Alken.   

Abstract

Using the new electromagnetic shockwave source of the Modulith SL 20 shockwave-induced renal trauma was evaluated by acute and chronic studies in the the canine kidney model. In a further study the electromagnetic shockwave source of the Lithostar Plus Overhead module was tested. Overall, 92 kidneys were exposed to shock waves coupled either by water bath (Modulith lab type) or by water cushion (Modulith prototype, Lithostar Overhead) under ultrasound localization. The generator voltage ranged between 11 and 21 kV, the number of impulses between 25 and 2500. After application of 1500/2500 shocks the extent of the renal lesion depended strictly on the applied generator voltage and was classified into 4 grades: Grade 0, no macroscopic trauma detectable (at 11-12 kV); grade 1, petechial medullary bleeding (at 13 kV); grade 2, cortical hematoma (at 14-16 kV); and grade 3, perirenal hematoma (17-20 kV). Whereas at low and medium energy levels the number of shocks played only a minor role, at maximal generator voltage (20 kV) even 25 impulses induced a grade 2 and 600 shocks a grade 3 lesion, emphasizing the importance of shockwave limitation in the upper energy range. In shockwave-induced renal trauma a vascular lesion was predominant and cellular necrosis was secondary. Coupling with a water cushion resulted in a 15%-20% decrease in the disintegrative and traumatic effect, which was compensated for by increasing the generator voltage by 2 kV. Long-term studies showed complete restitution following grade 1 and 2 trauma, whereas after a grade 3 lesion a small segmental and capsular fibrosis without hyperplasia of the juxtaglomerular apparatus was observed. Based on the characteristic ultrasound pattern found in the first study, the threshold for induction of grade 1 lesion was investigated. With both lithotripters a wide range for induction of a grade 1 lesion (Modulith 234-411, Lithostar Plus 220-740) and also a significant overlapping with grade 0 and 2 lesions was seen at low energy settings (levels 2-4). In contrast, the range of shocks (Modulith 96-150, Lithostar Plus 90-142) and overlapping was minimal when high energy was used (levels 7-9). Finally, the disintegration-trauma coefficient combining the results obtained in a standard stone model with those of the canine kidney model was introduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8490667     DOI: 10.1007/BF00182171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  28 in total

Review 1.  ESWL '90--state of the art. Limitations and future trends of shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J Rassweiler; P Alken
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1990

2.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy using a new, compact and portable unit.

Authors:  C Servadio; P Livne; H Winkler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Kidney changes after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: CT evaluation.

Authors:  J I Rubin; P H Arger; H M Pollack; M P Banner; B G Coleman; M C Mintz; K N VanArsdalen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Renal morphology and function immediately after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J V Kaude; C M Williams; M R Millner; K N Scott; B Finlayson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves.

Authors:  C Chaussy; E Schmiedt; D Jocham; W Brendel; B Forssmann; V Walther
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  [Blunt kidney injuries - operative or conservative therapy? A contribution to classification].

Authors:  J Rassweiler; F Eisenberger; J Buck
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1983-10

7.  [Prevalence and incidence of arterial hypertension in patients with kidney calculi treated by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy].

Authors:  B Liedl; D Jocham; C Lunz; C Schuster; C Chaussy
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  A survey of the acoustic output of commercial extracorporeal shock wave lithotripters.

Authors:  A J Coleman; J E Saunders
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on urinary excretion of N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosamidase.

Authors:  S Kitada; H Kuramoto; J Kumazawa; A Yamaguchi; H Nakasu; S Hara
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Do extracorporeal shock waves affect urinary excretion of glycosaminoglycans?

Authors:  S J Karlsen; B Smevik; K Klingenberg Lund; K J Berg
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1991-01
View more
  9 in total

1.  [Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Past, present and future].

Authors:  C Chaussy; T Bergsdorf; S Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Improving the lens design and performance of a contemporary electromagnetic shock wave lithotripter.

Authors:  Andreas Neisius; Nathan B Smith; Georgy Sankin; Nicholas John Kuntz; John Francis Madden; Daniel E Fovargue; Sorin Mitran; Michael Eric Lipkin; Walter Neal Simmons; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Optimising an escalating shockwave amplitude treatment strategy to protect the kidney from injury during shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Rajash K Handa; James A McAteer; Bret A Connors; Ziyue Liu; James E Lingeman; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 4.  Shock wave technology and application: an update.

Authors:  Jens J Rassweiler; Thomas Knoll; Kai-Uwe Köhrmann; James A McAteer; James E Lingeman; Robin O Cleveland; Michael R Bailey; Christian Chaussy
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  A chronic outcome of shock wave lithotripsy is parenchymal fibrosis.

Authors:  Rajash K Handa; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-07-15

6.  Effect of high shock number on acute complication development after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Miriam Hadj-Moussa; James A Brown
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Impact of repeated extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on prepubertal rat kidney.

Authors:  Jae Min Chung; Bu Kyung Park; Jung Hee Kim; Hyun Jung Lee; Sang Don Lee
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  A new electromagnetic shock-wave generator "SLX-F2" with user-selectable dual focus size: ex vivo evaluation of renal injury.

Authors:  Rasmus Leistner; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl; Rainer Grobholz; Maurice Stephan Michel; Ernst Marlinghaus; Kai Uwe Köhrmann; Peter Alken; Axel Häcker
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-05-05

9.  Reversible acute renal failure after unilateral extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Giovanni Liguori; Carlo Trombetta; Stefano Bucci; Leonardo Salamè; Silvana Savoldi; Emanuele Belgrano
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2003-10-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.