Literature DB >> 11023888

Cytoplasmic molecular delivery with shock waves: importance of impulse.

T Kodama1, M R Hamblin, A G Doukas.   

Abstract

Cell permeabilization using shock waves may be a way of introducing macromolecules and small polar molecules into the cytoplasm, and may have applications in gene therapy and anticancer drug delivery. The pressure profile of a shock wave indicates its energy content, and shock-wave propagation in tissue is associated with cellular displacement, leading to the development of cell deformation. In the present study, three different shock-wave sources were investigated; argon fluoride excimer laser, ruby laser, and shock tube. The duration of the pressure pulse of the shock tube was 100 times longer than the lasers. The uptake of two fluorophores, calcein (molecular weight: 622) and fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran (molecular weight: 71,600), into HL-60 human promyelocytic leukemia cells was investigated. The intracellular fluorescence was measured by a spectrofluorometer, and the cells were examined by confocal fluorescence microscopy. A single shock wave generated by the shock tube delivered both fluorophores into approximately 50% of the cells (p < 0.01), whereas shock waves from the lasers did not. The cell survival fraction was >0.95. Confocal microscopy showed that, in the case of calcein, there was a uniform fluorescence throughout the cell, whereas, in the case of FITC-dextran, the fluorescence was sometimes in the nucleus and at other times not. We conclude that the impulse of the shock wave (i.e., the pressure integrated over time), rather than the peak pressure, was a dominant factor for causing fluorophore uptake into living cells, and that shock waves might have changed the permeability of the nuclear membrane and transferred molecules directly into the nucleus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11023888      PMCID: PMC1301074          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76432-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  54 in total

1.  Laser-generated cavitation in absorbing liquid induced by acoustic diffraction.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1996-05-06       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Introduction of large molecules into viable fibroblasts by electroporation: optimization of loading and identification of labeled cellular compartments.

Authors:  M Glogauer; C A McCulloch
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.905

3.  Nuclear envelope permeability.

Authors:  P L Paine; L C Moore; S B Horowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Electroporation of cell membranes: a review.

Authors:  S Y Ho; G S Mittal
Journal:  Crit Rev Biotechnol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 8.429

5.  Shock wave permeabilization with ribosome inactivating proteins: a new approach to tumor therapy.

Authors:  M Delius; G Adams
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Introduction of definite amounts of nonpermeant molecules into living cells after electropermeabilization: direct access to the cytosol.

Authors:  L M Mir; H Banoun; C Paoletti
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.905

Review 7.  A review of the physical properties and biological effects of the high amplitude acoustic field used in extracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  A J Coleman; J E Saunders
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  Mechanism of uptake of the phosphonate analog (S)-1-(3-hydroxy-2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl)cytosine (HPMPC) in Vero cells.

Authors:  M C Connelly; B L Robbins; A Fridland
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1993-09-14       Impact factor: 5.858

9.  Differences in membrane lipid composition and fluidity of transplanted GRSL lymphoma cells, depending on their site of growth in the mouse.

Authors:  W J Van Blitterswijk; H Hilkmann; T Hengeveld
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1984-12-19

Review 10.  Gene therapy for cancer.

Authors:  A A Gutierrez; N R Lemoine; K Sikora
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-03-21       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  24 in total

1.  An experimental and theoretical analysis of ultrasound-induced permeabilization of cell membranes.

Authors:  Jagannathan Sundaram; Berlyn R Mellein; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Structural change in lipid bilayers and water penetration induced by shock waves: molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Kenichiro Koshiyama; Tetsuya Kodama; Takeru Yano; Shigeo Fujikawa
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Sonoporation from jetting cavitation bubbles.

Authors:  Claus-Dieter Ohl; Manish Arora; Roy Ikink; Nico de Jong; Michel Versluis; Michael Delius; Detlef Lohse
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Biophysical response to pulsed laser microbeam-induced cell lysis and molecular delivery.

Authors:  Amy N Hellman; Kaustubh R Rau; Helen H Yoon; Vasan Venugopalan
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.207

Review 5.  Can ultrasound enable efficient intracellular uptake of molecules? A retrospective literature review and analysis.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Jing Yan; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Shock Wave-Induced Damage and Poration in Eukaryotic Cell Membranes.

Authors:  Luz M López-Marín; Blanca E Millán-Chiu; Karen Castaño-González; Carmen Aceves; Francisco Fernández; Alfredo Varela-Echavarría; Achim M Loske
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 1.843

7.  Selective gene transfection of individual cells in vitro with plasmonic nanobubbles.

Authors:  Ekaterina Y Lukianova-Hleb; Adam P Samaniego; Jianguo Wen; Leonid S Metelitsa; Chung-Che Chang; Dmitri O Lapotko
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Shockwaves increase T-cell proliferation and IL-2 expression through ATP release, P2X7 receptors, and FAK activation.

Authors:  Tiecheng Yu; Wolfgang G Junger; Changji Yuan; An Jin; Yi Zhao; Xueqing Zheng; Yanjun Zeng; Jianguo Liu
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 4.249

9.  Direct comparison of the spread area, contractility, and migration of balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts adhered to fibronectin- and RGD-modified substrata.

Authors:  Padmavathy Rajagopalan; William A Marganski; Xin Q Brown; Joyce Y Wong
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Delivery of ribosome-inactivating protein toxin into cancer cells with shock waves.

Authors:  Tetsuya Kodama; Apostolos G Doukas; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2003-01-10       Impact factor: 8.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.