Literature DB >> 27408490

Difference in the acetabular cup orientation in standing and supine radiographs.

Munir Khan1, Tom Beckingsale1, Martin Marsh1, Jim Holland1.   

Abstract

Acetabular orientation changes with that of the pelvis during lying and standing. This study was designed to measure these changes. We assessed 17 BHR replacements using EBRA software. The mean acetabular anteversion was more (p = 0.02) on erect than supine radiographs. Linear regression analysis showed that anteversion and inclination increased in some while decreased in others, and Bland and Altman analysis showed wide limits of agreement. The changes in acetabular orientation are thus subject to significant variations between the patients. We suggest studying the factors affecting acetabular orientation in standing to help reduce joint reaction forces and improve outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anteversion; Hip; Inclination; Radiographs; Supine

Year:  2016        PMID: 27408490      PMCID: PMC4919313          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2016.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  28 in total

1.  Hip-spine relationship: a radio-anatomical study for optimization in acetabular cup positioning.

Authors:  J-Y Lazennec; N Charlot; M Gorin; B Roger; N Arafati; A Bissery; G Saillant
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints: Part I: the role of materials.

Authors:  Duncan Dowson; Cath Hardaker; Magnus Flett; Graham H Isaac
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate.

Authors:  Burkhard Lembeck; Otto Mueller; Patrik Reize; Nikolaus Wuelker
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 4.  Imaging and navigation measurement of acetabular component position in THA.

Authors:  Zhinian Wan; Aamer Malik; Branislav Jaramaz; Lisa Chao; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components.

Authors:  R De Haan; P A Campbell; E P Su; K A De Smet
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-09

6.  Quantification of pelvic tilt in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jinjun Zhu; Zhinian Wan; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Acetabular anteversion with CT in supine, simulated standing, and sitting positions in a THA patient population.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Lazennec; Patrick Boyer; Michel Gorin; Yves Catonné; Marc Antoine Rousseau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Functional pelvic orientation measured from lateral standing and sitting radiographs.

Authors:  Anthony M DiGioia; Mahmoud A Hafez; Branislav Jaramaz; Timothy J Levison; James E Moody
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Edge loading in metal-on-metal hips: low clearance is a new risk factor.

Authors:  Richard J Underwood; Angelos Zografos; Ritchie S Sayles; Alister Hart; Philippa Cann
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.617

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessing component orientation of total hip arthroplasty using the low-dose bi-planar radiographs.

Authors:  Zhuyi Ma; Hao Tang; Yixin Zhou; Siyuan Wang; Dejin Yang; Shaoyi Guo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 2.562

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.