Literature DB >> 15578565

A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints: Part I: the role of materials.

Duncan Dowson1, Cath Hardaker, Magnus Flett, Graham H Isaac.   

Abstract

The use of metal-on-metal low-wearing bearings has promoted great interest in the factors determining the volume of wear debris generated in such joints, including the developing surface replacement alternatives. Twenty-six pairs of low- and high-carbon components in wrought or cast form of 36 mm nominal diameter and exhibiting similar clearances were studied over 5 million test cycles in a 10-station hip joint simulator. Low-carbon cast materials exhibited higher wear than high-carbon cast or wrought materials. Little difference was found in the running-in wear volumes generated by high-carbon wrought or cast materials, but the wrought material exhibited a slight advantage at the smallest diametral clearance considered of 105 microm. Volumetric wear appeared to decrease as the diametral clearance decreased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15578565     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  11 in total

1.  Low incidence of groin pain and early failure with large metal articulation total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  John B Meding; Lindsey K Meding; E Michael Keating; Michael E Berend
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Simple isolation method for the bulk isolation of wear particles from metal on metal bearing surfaces generated in a hip simulator test.

Authors:  Fang Lu; Matt Royle; Ferdinand V Lali; Alister J Hart; Simon Collins; Jonathan Housden; Julia C Shelton
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Sporting and physical activity following hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Noel E Fisher; Vijay V Killampalli; Rakesh K Kundra; Nikolas A Jagodzinski; Keshav Mathur; Alex D Reading
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Ten different hip resurfacing systems: biomechanical analysis of design and material properties.

Authors:  Christian Heisel; Jennifer A Kleinhans; Michael Menge; Jan Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Difference in the acetabular cup orientation in standing and supine radiographs.

Authors:  Munir Khan; Tom Beckingsale; Martin Marsh; Jim Holland
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-04-05

Review 6.  Biotribology of artificial hip joints.

Authors:  Francesca Di Puccio; Lorenza Mattei
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-01-18

7.  Characterization of Wear Particles Generated from CoCrMo Alloy under Sliding Wear Conditions.

Authors:  R Pourzal; I Catelas; R Theissmann; C Kaddick; A Fischer
Journal:  Wear       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.892

8.  An initial experience with hip resurfacing versus cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Justin Michael Arndt; Glenn D Wera; Victor M Goldberg
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-06-25

Review 9.  [Particle release in metal-on-metal bearings. A risk analysis].

Authors:  C Heisel; M Thomsen; E Jakubowitz; J P Kretzer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Current indications for hip resurfacing arthroplasty in 2016.

Authors:  Robert Sershon; Rishi Balkissoon; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.