Literature DB >> 27401692

Multi-gene panel testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility in a rural Familial Cancer Program.

David J Hermel1, Wendy C McKinnon1, Marie E Wood1, Marc S Greenblatt2.   

Abstract

This study explores our Familial Cancer Program's experience implementing multi-gene panel testing in a largely rural patient population. We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing panel testing between May 2011 and August 2015. Our goal was to evaluate factors that might be predictors of identifying variants (pathogenic or uncertain significance) and to assess clinical management changes due to testing. We utilized a structured family history tool to determine the significance of patient's family histories with respect to identification of genetic variants. A total of 227 patients underwent panel testing at our center and 67 patients (29.5 %) had variants identified, with 8 (3.5 %) having multiple variants. Overall, 44 patients (19.4 %) had a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) and 28 patients (12.3 %) had a pathogenic variant detected, with 10 (4.4 %) having pathogenic variants in highly penetrant genes. We found no statistical difference in patient familial and personal cancer history, age, rural status, Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry, insurance coverage and prior single-gene testing among those with pathogenic, VUS and negative panel testing results. There were no predictors of pathogenic variants on regression analysis. Panel testing changed cancer screening and management guidelines from that expected based on family history alone in 13.2 % of patients. Ultimately, cancer panel testing does yield critical information not identified by traditional single gene testing but maximal utility through a broad range of personal and family histories requires improved interpretation of variants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer genetics; Familial and hereditary cancers; Genetic cancer assessment; Genetic counseling; Multigene panels; Multiplex testing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27401692     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9913-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  16 in total

Review 1.  Sequence Variants of Uncertain Significance: What to Do When Genetic Test Results Are Not Definitive.

Authors:  Marc S Greenblatt
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.495

2.  Rescreening for genetic mutations using multi-gene panel testing in patients who previously underwent non-informative genetic screening.

Authors:  Melissa K Frey; Sarah H Kim; Rebecca Yee Bassett; Jessica Martineau; Emily Dalton; Jing-Yi Chern; Stephanie V Blank
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  An evaluation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 founder mutations penetrance estimates for breast cancer among Ashkenazi Jewish women.

Authors:  Monica R McClain; Katherine L Nathanson; Glenn E Palomaki; James E Haddow
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Multigene panel testing: planning the next generation of research studies in clinical cancer genetics.

Authors:  Mark Robson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Cancer genetic testing panels for inherited cancer susceptibility: the clinical experience of a large adult genetics practice.

Authors:  Christina G Selkirk; Kristen J Vogel; Anna C Newlin; Scott M Weissman; Shelly M Weiss; Chi-Hsiung Wang; Peter J Hulick
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Classification of missense substitutions in the BRCA genes: a database dedicated to Ex-UVs.

Authors:  Maxime P Vallée; Tiana C Francy; Megan K Judkins; Davit Babikyan; Fabienne Lesueur; Amanda Gammon; David E Goldgar; Fergus J Couch; Sean V Tavtigian
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.878

7.  Clinical Application of Multigene Panels: Challenges of Next-Generation Counseling and Cancer Risk Management.

Authors:  Thomas Paul Slavin; Mariana Niell-Swiller; Ilana Solomon; Bita Nehoray; Christina Rybak; Kathleen R Blazer; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients.

Authors:  Holly LaDuca; A J Stuenkel; Jill S Dolinsky; Steven Keiles; Stephany Tandy; Tina Pesaran; Elaine Chen; Chia-Ling Gau; Erika Palmaer; Kamelia Shoaepour; Divya Shah; Virginia Speare; Stephanie Gandomi; Elizabeth Chao
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Panel-based testing for inherited colorectal cancer: a descriptive study of clinical testing performed by a US laboratory.

Authors:  D Cragun; C Radford; J S Dolinsky; M Caldwell; E Chao; T Pal
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.438

10.  Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variant prevalence among the first 10,000 patients referred for next-generation cancer panel testing.

Authors:  Lisa R Susswein; Megan L Marshall; Rachel Nusbaum; Kristen J Vogel Postula; Scott M Weissman; Lauren Yackowski; Erica M Vaccari; Jeffrey Bissonnette; Jessica K Booker; M Laura Cremona; Federica Gibellini; Patricia D Murphy; Daniel E Pineda-Alvarez; Guido D Pollevick; Zhixiong Xu; Gabi Richard; Sherri Bale; Rachel T Klein; Kathleen S Hruska; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  7 in total

1.  Patients with negative multi-gene panel testing: a back to the future paradox?

Authors:  Steven M Sorscher
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Placing negative multi-gene panel results into clinical context.

Authors:  David J Hermel; Wendy C McKinnon; Marie E Wood; Marc S Greenblatt
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  A comparison of cancer risk assessment and testing outcomes in patients from underserved vs. tertiary care settings.

Authors:  Huma Q Rana; Sarah R Cochrane; Elaine Hiller; Ruth N Akindele; Callie M Nibecker; Ludmila A Svoboda; Angel M Cronin; Judy E Garber; Christopher S Lathan
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-11-18

4.  Clinical management among individuals with variant of uncertain significance in hereditary cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sukh Makhnoon; Erica M Bednar; Kate J Krause; Susan K Peterson; Maria A Lopez-Olivo
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Germline mutation landscape of Chinese patients with familial breast/ovarian cancer in a panel of 22 susceptibility genes.

Authors:  Jiayu Wang; Weiwei Li; Yujian Shi; Yan Huang; Tao Sun; Lili Tang; Qing Lu; Qiumo Lei; Ning Liao; Feng Jin; Hui Li; Tao Huang; Jun Qian; Danmei Pang; Shusen Wang; Peizhi Fan; Xinhong Wu; Ying Lin; Haiyan Qin; Binghe Xu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  A functional assay-based procedure to classify mismatch repair gene variants in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Mark Drost; Yvonne Tiersma; Bryony A Thompson; Jane H Frederiksen; Guido Keijzers; Dylan Glubb; Scott Kathe; Jan Osinga; Helga Westers; Lisa Pappas; Kenneth M Boucher; Siska Molenkamp; José B Zonneveld; Christi J van Asperen; David E Goldgar; Susan S Wallace; Rolf H Sijmons; Amanda B Spurdle; Lene J Rasmussen; Marc S Greenblatt; Niels de Wind; Sean V Tavtigian
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Clinical and psychological outcomes of receiving a variant of uncertain significance from multigene panel testing or genomic sequencing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chloe Mighton; Salma Shickh; Elizabeth Uleryk; Petros Pechlivanoglou; Yvonne Bombard
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 8.822

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.